Advancing Accountability through Conselhos Consultivos in Mozambique: PROGOAS Case Study

Marco Faehndrich, Ilídio Nhantumbo
{"title":"Advancing Accountability through Conselhos Consultivos in Mozambique: PROGOAS Case Study","authors":"Marco Faehndrich,&nbsp;Ilídio Nhantumbo","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00420.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In recent years accountability has become a buzzword in the development agenda. Even though evidence of its impact remains weak, the underlying assumption is that accountability will result in empowerment, improved quality of democratic governance, and development effectiveness. It is therefore a crucial issue for Mozambique, where good governance is widely seen as one of the biggest challenges in the decentralisation process and poverty reduction strategies.</p>\n <p>This case study explores the possible factors that enable or hinder accountability initiatives in Mozambique, focusing on the Governance, Water and Sanitation Programme (PROGOAS) implemented by Helvetas Swiss Intercooperation (HELVETAS) and co-financed by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). It examines how public and social accountability can be promoted in a fragile context in terms of institutional capacity and legitimacy, and looks at the constraints and opportunities encountered by <i>conselhos consultivos</i>, a recent and promising institution in Mozambique.</p>\n <p>Based on a survey, several interviews, a power analysis and the authors' personal observations, this study concludes that PROGOAS can advance public accountability at the local level, especially when different approaches, such as capacity building, radio programmes and local governance self-assessments, are combined and developed. However, public accountability is also influenced by other endogenous variables of local governance, such as functionality, representation, participation in decision making and power relations, which can be addressed only partially by programme activities.</p>\n <p>No evidence was found that an external actor such as PROGOAS can contribute in the short run to the emergence of sustainable initiatives that manifest themselves through <i>conselhos consultivos</i>. The programme can sow seeds and create a fertile ground, especially through capacity development and dissemination of information. But local civil society is still too fragmented, weak and aid dependent to play an autonomous role. It is therefore likely that citizens will create new political spaces and adopt new forms of power only as a result of increasing decentralisation, public accountability and local development.</p>\n <p>For this reason, it is suggested that INGOs and national NGOs should play a supporting role at all levels of the political system, creating an enabling environment for accountability from the bottom to the top. In particular, they should embody accountability throughout planning, implementation and monitoring processes by sharing information, knowledge and opinions with stakeholders, beneficiaries and the general public; they should strengthen local organisations and their capacity to hold local authorities more accountable; sensitise local authorities by emphasising incentives for accountability; they should provide an informational bridge between the district level and provincial and national levels; and they should promote institutional change at the centre towards more political, administrative and financial decentralisation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100618,"journal":{"name":"IDS Working Papers","volume":"2013 420","pages":"1-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00420.x","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00420.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In recent years accountability has become a buzzword in the development agenda. Even though evidence of its impact remains weak, the underlying assumption is that accountability will result in empowerment, improved quality of democratic governance, and development effectiveness. It is therefore a crucial issue for Mozambique, where good governance is widely seen as one of the biggest challenges in the decentralisation process and poverty reduction strategies.

This case study explores the possible factors that enable or hinder accountability initiatives in Mozambique, focusing on the Governance, Water and Sanitation Programme (PROGOAS) implemented by Helvetas Swiss Intercooperation (HELVETAS) and co-financed by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). It examines how public and social accountability can be promoted in a fragile context in terms of institutional capacity and legitimacy, and looks at the constraints and opportunities encountered by conselhos consultivos, a recent and promising institution in Mozambique.

Based on a survey, several interviews, a power analysis and the authors' personal observations, this study concludes that PROGOAS can advance public accountability at the local level, especially when different approaches, such as capacity building, radio programmes and local governance self-assessments, are combined and developed. However, public accountability is also influenced by other endogenous variables of local governance, such as functionality, representation, participation in decision making and power relations, which can be addressed only partially by programme activities.

No evidence was found that an external actor such as PROGOAS can contribute in the short run to the emergence of sustainable initiatives that manifest themselves through conselhos consultivos. The programme can sow seeds and create a fertile ground, especially through capacity development and dissemination of information. But local civil society is still too fragmented, weak and aid dependent to play an autonomous role. It is therefore likely that citizens will create new political spaces and adopt new forms of power only as a result of increasing decentralisation, public accountability and local development.

For this reason, it is suggested that INGOs and national NGOs should play a supporting role at all levels of the political system, creating an enabling environment for accountability from the bottom to the top. In particular, they should embody accountability throughout planning, implementation and monitoring processes by sharing information, knowledge and opinions with stakeholders, beneficiaries and the general public; they should strengthen local organisations and their capacity to hold local authorities more accountable; sensitise local authorities by emphasising incentives for accountability; they should provide an informational bridge between the district level and provincial and national levels; and they should promote institutional change at the centre towards more political, administrative and financial decentralisation.

在莫桑比克通过协商促进问责制:PROGOAS案例研究
近年来,问责制已成为发展议程中的一个流行词。尽管证明其影响的证据仍然薄弱,但基本的假设是,问责制将导致赋予权力,提高民主治理的质量和发展效率。因此,这对莫桑比克来说是一个至关重要的问题,在那里,良好的治理被广泛视为权力下放进程和减贫战略中的最大挑战之一。本案例研究探讨了推动或阻碍莫桑比克问责制举措的可能因素,重点关注由瑞士发展与合作署(SDC)共同资助、Helvetas -瑞士国际合作组织(Helvetas)实施的治理、水和卫生项目(PROGOAS)。报告探讨了在体制能力和合法性方面如何在脆弱的背景下促进公共和社会问责制,并研究了莫桑比克最近成立的一个有前途的机构——咨询委员会所面临的限制和机遇。基于一项调查、几次访谈、权力分析和作者的个人观察,本研究得出结论,PROGOAS可以促进地方一级的公共问责制,特别是当不同的方法,如能力建设、广播节目和地方治理自我评估相结合和发展时。然而,公共问责制也受到地方治理的其他内生变量的影响,如功能、代表性、参与决策和权力关系,这些问题只能通过方案活动部分解决。没有证据表明,象PROGOAS这样的外部行动者可以在短期内促成通过协商会议表现出来的可持续倡议的出现。该方案可以播下种子,创造肥沃的土壤,特别是通过能力发展和信息传播。但是,当地的公民社会仍然过于分散、薄弱和依赖援助,无法发挥自主作用。因此,只有在权力下放、公共责任和地方发展不断加强的情况下,公民才有可能创造新的政治空间,并采用新的权力形式。因此,建议非政府组织和国家非政府组织在各级政治制度中发挥支持作用,创造一种从下到上的问责的有利环境。特别是,它们应通过与利益攸关方、受益者和一般公众分享信息、知识和意见,在整个规划、执行和监测过程中体现问责制;它们应加强地方组织及其能力,使地方当局更负责任;通过强调对问责的激励措施,提高地方当局的敏感性;它们应成为地区一级与省和国家一级之间的信息桥梁;它们还应该促进中央的制度变革,使其在政治、行政和财政上更加分权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信