Histopathologic and bacterial evaluation of conventional and new copper amalgams.

D R Heys, C F Cox, R J Heys, W J Loesche, J K Avery
{"title":"Histopathologic and bacterial evaluation of conventional and new copper amalgams.","authors":"D R Heys,&nbsp;C F Cox,&nbsp;R J Heys,&nbsp;W J Loesche,&nbsp;J K Avery","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0714.1979.tb01626.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo pulpal responses in monkeys and in vitro bacterial inhibition studies were completed on new copper amalgams, Sybraloy, Dispersalloy, Tytin and a conventional Spheraloy amalgam. Amalgams were placed in cavities lined with ZOE and in unlined cavities. Silicate and ZOE were used as controls. A total of 165 adult monkey teeth were evaluated at 3 days, 5 and 8 weeks. At 3 days the pulpal responses elicited by the copper amalgams appeared similar to conventional Spheraloy, all showing a slight to moderate response. At 5 weeks the majority of amalgams exhibited a slight pulpar response with a tubular reparative dentin under each restoration. The 8 week pulpal response showed a reduction of the inflammatory response characterized by a tubular reparative dentin with a uniform zone of predentin. Lined ZOE controls exhibited a slight response while silicate showed a moderate response with some persistent chronic inflammation. In vitro bacterial tests revealed that the various amalgams had little to no inhibitory effect on the three serotypes of S. mutans that are most prominent in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":16672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1979.tb01626.x","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1979.tb01626.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In vivo pulpal responses in monkeys and in vitro bacterial inhibition studies were completed on new copper amalgams, Sybraloy, Dispersalloy, Tytin and a conventional Spheraloy amalgam. Amalgams were placed in cavities lined with ZOE and in unlined cavities. Silicate and ZOE were used as controls. A total of 165 adult monkey teeth were evaluated at 3 days, 5 and 8 weeks. At 3 days the pulpal responses elicited by the copper amalgams appeared similar to conventional Spheraloy, all showing a slight to moderate response. At 5 weeks the majority of amalgams exhibited a slight pulpar response with a tubular reparative dentin under each restoration. The 8 week pulpal response showed a reduction of the inflammatory response characterized by a tubular reparative dentin with a uniform zone of predentin. Lined ZOE controls exhibited a slight response while silicate showed a moderate response with some persistent chronic inflammation. In vitro bacterial tests revealed that the various amalgams had little to no inhibitory effect on the three serotypes of S. mutans that are most prominent in humans.

传统和新型铜汞合金的组织病理学和细菌评价。
完成了新型铜汞合金Sybraloy、Dispersalloy、Tytin和一种传统的Spheraloy汞合金在猴子体内的牙髓反应和体外的细菌抑制研究。汞合金被放置在有ZOE衬里的空腔和没有衬里的空腔中。以硅酸盐和ZOE为对照。分别于第3天、第5周和第8周对165颗成年猴牙齿进行评估。在第3天,铜汞合金引起的牙髓反应与常规球型相似,均表现出轻微至中度的反应。在5周时,大多数汞合金在每次修复中表现出轻微的牙髓反应和管状修复牙本质。8周的牙髓反应显示炎症反应减少,其特征是管状修复牙本质具有均匀的牙本质区。ZOE对照表现出轻微的反应,而硅酸盐则表现出中度反应,伴有一些持续的慢性炎症。体外细菌试验表明,各种汞合金对人类中最突出的三种血清型变形链球菌几乎没有抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信