The Political Economy of Low Carbon Energy in Kenya

Peter Newell, Jon Phillips, Ana Pueyo, Edith Kirumba, Nicolas Ozor, Kevin Urama
{"title":"The Political Economy of Low Carbon Energy in Kenya","authors":"Peter Newell,&nbsp;Jon Phillips,&nbsp;Ana Pueyo,&nbsp;Edith Kirumba,&nbsp;Nicolas Ozor,&nbsp;Kevin Urama","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2014.00445.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There is growing international focus on how to support more integrated approaches to addressing climate change in ways that capture synergies and minimise the trade-offs between climate change mitigation, adaptation and development. These aims are embodied in the concept of climate compatible development (CCD). But what does this look like in practice in Kenya?</p>\n <p>With a National Action Plan on Climate Change, a Vision 2030 Strategy, a new constitution and a revised Energy Policy, Kenya is at a critical cross-roads with respect to defining its energy future for the years to come. The challenge is to enable a just transition to a lower carbon economy that delivers poverty reduction and climate resilience at the same time. But thinking about who sets the terms of transition and for whom, raises key political questions about the role of actors, interests and institutions in the energy sector. In other words, who has the power to change power?</p>\n <p>Drawing on 29 interviews with government officials, donors and businesses conducted during 2013, insights gleaned from an interactive workshop with practitioners on the themes of the research, as well as available academic and grey literature, this paper explores the role of politics, actors and institutions in enabling or frustrating the pursuit of climate compatible energy development in Kenya. This is a critical time for Kenya in deciding its energy future and whether and how it will aim to make it ‘climate compatible’. Issues of power and political economy will play a key role in determining technological and social outcomes: the winners and losers from different energy pathways and on whose terms and how the trade-offs between competing policy objectives are resolved. In particular political economy analysis helps to understand the potential for energy systems to meet climate, development and adaptation needs simultaneously.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100618,"journal":{"name":"IDS Working Papers","volume":"2014 445","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2014.00445.x","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2014.00445.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

There is growing international focus on how to support more integrated approaches to addressing climate change in ways that capture synergies and minimise the trade-offs between climate change mitigation, adaptation and development. These aims are embodied in the concept of climate compatible development (CCD). But what does this look like in practice in Kenya?

With a National Action Plan on Climate Change, a Vision 2030 Strategy, a new constitution and a revised Energy Policy, Kenya is at a critical cross-roads with respect to defining its energy future for the years to come. The challenge is to enable a just transition to a lower carbon economy that delivers poverty reduction and climate resilience at the same time. But thinking about who sets the terms of transition and for whom, raises key political questions about the role of actors, interests and institutions in the energy sector. In other words, who has the power to change power?

Drawing on 29 interviews with government officials, donors and businesses conducted during 2013, insights gleaned from an interactive workshop with practitioners on the themes of the research, as well as available academic and grey literature, this paper explores the role of politics, actors and institutions in enabling or frustrating the pursuit of climate compatible energy development in Kenya. This is a critical time for Kenya in deciding its energy future and whether and how it will aim to make it ‘climate compatible’. Issues of power and political economy will play a key role in determining technological and social outcomes: the winners and losers from different energy pathways and on whose terms and how the trade-offs between competing policy objectives are resolved. In particular political economy analysis helps to understand the potential for energy systems to meet climate, development and adaptation needs simultaneously.

肯尼亚低碳能源的政治经济学
国际社会日益关注如何支持更综合的办法,以利用协同增效和尽量减少减缓、适应和发展气候变化之间的权衡的方式应对气候变化。这些目标体现在气候相容发展(CCD)的概念中。但这在肯尼亚的实践中是怎样的呢?肯尼亚制定了《国家气候变化行动计划》、《2030年愿景战略》、新宪法和修订后的能源政策,目前正处于确定未来能源发展方向的关键十字路口。我们面临的挑战是实现向低碳经济的公正过渡,同时实现减贫和气候适应能力。但是,考虑到谁来制定过渡条件,以及为谁制定过渡条件,就会提出一些关键的政治问题,涉及能源领域的参与者、利益集团和机构的角色。换句话说,谁有权力改变权力?根据2013年对政府官员、捐助者和企业进行的29次访谈,从与从业者就研究主题进行的互动研讨会中收集到的见解,以及现有的学术和灰色文献,本文探讨了政治、行动者和机构在肯尼亚实现或阻碍气候相容能源发展的过程中所起的作用。对于肯尼亚来说,这是决定其能源未来以及是否以及如何使其“与气候相容”的关键时刻。权力和政治经济问题将在决定技术和社会结果方面发挥关键作用:不同能源途径的赢家和输家,以及在谁的条件下以及如何解决相互竞争的政策目标之间的权衡。特别是政治经济分析有助于了解能源系统同时满足气候、发展和适应需求的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信