AN EVALUATION OF RANS TURBULENCE CLOSURE MODELS FOR SPILLING BREAKERS

Pub Date : 2014-10-28 DOI:10.9753/ICCE.V34.WAVES.5
S. Brown, V. Magar, D. Greaves, D. Conley
{"title":"AN EVALUATION OF RANS TURBULENCE CLOSURE MODELS FOR SPILLING BREAKERS","authors":"S. Brown, V. Magar, D. Greaves, D. Conley","doi":"10.9753/ICCE.V34.WAVES.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breaking waves generate turbulence which, along with the bottom stress, undertow, and other mean currents, is capable of suspending and transporting large quantities of sediment. In the present work, open source computational fluid dynamics software is utilised to evaluate four different turbulence models for the application of spilling breakers in the surf zone. The turbulence models are compared against both existing laboratory data and previous numerical models for surface elevation, velocity and turbulent kinetic energy profiles. The results imply that the different models vary in performance for each of these properties and that for incompressible, multiphase flows, it is important to include density explicitly in the turbulence transport equations. Overall, it was found that, out of the models considered, the best one for spilling breakers is the nonlinear k-epsilon model.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9753/ICCE.V34.WAVES.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Breaking waves generate turbulence which, along with the bottom stress, undertow, and other mean currents, is capable of suspending and transporting large quantities of sediment. In the present work, open source computational fluid dynamics software is utilised to evaluate four different turbulence models for the application of spilling breakers in the surf zone. The turbulence models are compared against both existing laboratory data and previous numerical models for surface elevation, velocity and turbulent kinetic energy profiles. The results imply that the different models vary in performance for each of these properties and that for incompressible, multiphase flows, it is important to include density explicitly in the turbulence transport equations. Overall, it was found that, out of the models considered, the best one for spilling breakers is the nonlinear k-epsilon model.
分享
查看原文
溢流断路器湍流闭合模型的评价
破碎的波浪会产生湍流,这种湍流与底部应力、底流和其他平均水流一起,能够悬浮和输送大量的沉积物。在本工作中,利用开源计算流体动力学软件对四种不同的湍流模型进行了评估,以便在冲浪区应用溢出式破浪器。湍流模型与现有的实验室数据和先前的地表高程、速度和湍流动能剖面的数值模型进行了比较。结果表明,不同的模型对这些性质的表现各不相同,对于不可压缩的多相流,在湍流输运方程中明确地包括密度是很重要的。总的来说,在考虑的模型中,溢出断路器的最佳模型是非线性k-epsilon模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信