Yield and Nutritive Value Differences Among Cool-Season Grasses

Geoffrey E. Brink, Michael D. Casler
{"title":"Yield and Nutritive Value Differences Among Cool-Season Grasses","authors":"Geoffrey E. Brink,&nbsp;Michael D. Casler","doi":"10.1094/FG-2012-0619-01-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grasses are typically utilized at a vegetative stage of maturity under managed intensive rotational grazing. We compared the yield and nutritive value of the leaf and stem fraction, and total herbage of eight erect-growing, perennial cool-season grasses during 30-day intervals in the spring, summer, and fall at two Wisconsin locations. Total herbage production of all grasses was greatest during the spring as expected, but with the exception of smooth bromegrass, differences in leaf yield were relatively small. During the summer and fall, endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall fescue produced the greatest leaf yield and quackgrass and smooth bromegrass the least. Significant leaf crude protein (CP) concentration differences among the eight grasses occurred during the spring, summer, and fall, but leaf CP of all grasses exceeded 16% and any differences would likely be inconsequential. Lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and greatest NDF digestibility were measured in leaves of meadow fescue or timothy. Because yield differences among these grasses during the spring can be attributed primarily to the stem fraction and spring yield constitutes a large proportion of annual yield, a producer's perception of value to a grazing system may be biased by total yield estimates. The greater nutritive value of grasses like meadow fescue must be balanced against slightly lower productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":100549,"journal":{"name":"Forage & Grazinglands","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forage & Grazinglands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2012-0619-01-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Grasses are typically utilized at a vegetative stage of maturity under managed intensive rotational grazing. We compared the yield and nutritive value of the leaf and stem fraction, and total herbage of eight erect-growing, perennial cool-season grasses during 30-day intervals in the spring, summer, and fall at two Wisconsin locations. Total herbage production of all grasses was greatest during the spring as expected, but with the exception of smooth bromegrass, differences in leaf yield were relatively small. During the summer and fall, endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall fescue produced the greatest leaf yield and quackgrass and smooth bromegrass the least. Significant leaf crude protein (CP) concentration differences among the eight grasses occurred during the spring, summer, and fall, but leaf CP of all grasses exceeded 16% and any differences would likely be inconsequential. Lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and greatest NDF digestibility were measured in leaves of meadow fescue or timothy. Because yield differences among these grasses during the spring can be attributed primarily to the stem fraction and spring yield constitutes a large proportion of annual yield, a producer's perception of value to a grazing system may be biased by total yield estimates. The greater nutritive value of grasses like meadow fescue must be balanced against slightly lower productivity.

寒季牧草产量和营养价值的差异
在有管理的集约轮牧下,牧草通常在营养成熟阶段被利用。我们比较了8种直立生长的多年生冷季草在春季、夏季和秋季的产量和营养价值,以及总牧草。所有牧草的总产量在春季都达到了预期的最高水平,但除凤尾草外,叶片产量的差异相对较小。夏、秋两季,受内生菌侵染和无内生菌侵染的高羊茅叶片产量最高,庸医草和凤尾草叶片产量最低。8种牧草的叶片粗蛋白质(CP)浓度在春、夏、秋三个季节均存在显著差异,但均超过16%,差异不大。草甸羊茅和蒂莫西草叶片中性洗涤纤维(NDF)含量最低,NDF消化率最高。由于这些牧草在春季的产量差异可主要归因于茎部分,而春季产量占年产量的很大比例,因此生产者对放牧系统价值的感知可能会受到总产量估计的影响。草甸羊茅等牧草的高营养价值必须与稍低的生产力相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信