Do Preoperative Supine Radiographs Predict Postoperative Residual Lumbar Curvatures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-08 DOI:10.1177/21925682231162556
Prashant V Rajan, Richard Steiner, Todd F Ritzman, Trey Moberly, Lorena V Floccari
{"title":"Do Preoperative Supine Radiographs Predict Postoperative Residual Lumbar Curvatures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Prashant V Rajan, Richard Steiner, Todd F Ritzman, Trey Moberly, Lorena V Floccari","doi":"10.1177/21925682231162556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares supine vs bending flexibility radiographs and evaluates their ability to predict residual postoperative lumbar curvature after selective thoracic fusion for Lenke 1 and 2 curves across different lumbar modifiers (A, B, and C) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of AIS Lenke 1 and 2 patients who underwent posterior fusion. All patients had preoperative flexibility radiographs including side-bending and supine posteroanterior (PA) films, in addition to pre- and post-operative standing PA and lateral radiographs. We used SurgiMap 2.0 software for all radiographic measurements. Pearson correlations and linear regression models were developed in SAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 patients were included mean age 14.9 years and follow-up 72.3 months<b>.</b> Preoperative supine lumbar Cobb angle and preoperative side-bending Cobb angles had similar, positive correlations with postoperative lumbar Cobb angle, <i>r</i> = .55 (<i>P</i> < .001) and <i>r</i> = .54 (<i>P</i> < .001), respectively. Three regression models were built to predict postoperative lumbar Cobb angles from preoperative information: Model S (R<sup>2</sup> = .39) uses preoperative supine lumbar curve; Model B (R<sup>2</sup> = .44) uses preoperative side-bending lumbar curve; Model SB (R<sup>2</sup> = .49) uses both preoperative supine and side-bending lumbar curves. Model S and B performed just as well as Model SB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Either supine or side-bending radiographs alone may be used to estimate mean residual postoperative lumbar curvature after selective posterior thoracic fusion, but little is to be gained by taking both supine and side-bending radiographs.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231162556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective comparative study.

Objectives: This study compares supine vs bending flexibility radiographs and evaluates their ability to predict residual postoperative lumbar curvature after selective thoracic fusion for Lenke 1 and 2 curves across different lumbar modifiers (A, B, and C) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: This was a retrospective review of AIS Lenke 1 and 2 patients who underwent posterior fusion. All patients had preoperative flexibility radiographs including side-bending and supine posteroanterior (PA) films, in addition to pre- and post-operative standing PA and lateral radiographs. We used SurgiMap 2.0 software for all radiographic measurements. Pearson correlations and linear regression models were developed in SAS.

Results: A total of 86 patients were included mean age 14.9 years and follow-up 72.3 months. Preoperative supine lumbar Cobb angle and preoperative side-bending Cobb angles had similar, positive correlations with postoperative lumbar Cobb angle, r = .55 (P < .001) and r = .54 (P < .001), respectively. Three regression models were built to predict postoperative lumbar Cobb angles from preoperative information: Model S (R2 = .39) uses preoperative supine lumbar curve; Model B (R2 = .44) uses preoperative side-bending lumbar curve; Model SB (R2 = .49) uses both preoperative supine and side-bending lumbar curves. Model S and B performed just as well as Model SB.

Conclusion: Either supine or side-bending radiographs alone may be used to estimate mean residual postoperative lumbar curvature after selective posterior thoracic fusion, but little is to be gained by taking both supine and side-bending radiographs.

术前仰卧位X光片能预测青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的术后残余腰椎曲度吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
研究设计研究目的:回顾性比较研究:本研究比较了仰卧位与屈曲位弹性X光片,并评估了它们预测青少年特发性脊柱侧弯症(AIS)Lenke 1和2型脊柱侧弯选择性胸椎融合术后残余腰椎曲度的能力:这是一项对接受后路融合术的AIS Lenke 1和2型患者的回顾性研究。所有患者术前都接受了柔韧性X光片检查,包括侧弯和仰卧后正位(PA)片,以及术前和术后的立位PA和侧位X光片。我们使用 SurgiMap 2.0 软件进行所有射线测量。在 SAS 中建立了皮尔逊相关性和线性回归模型:共纳入 86 名患者,平均年龄 14.9 岁,随访 72.3 个月。术前仰卧位腰椎Cobb角和术前侧弯位Cobb角与术后腰椎Cobb角有相似的正相关性,分别为r = .55 (P < .001) 和r = .54 (P < .001)。根据术前信息建立了三个回归模型来预测术后腰椎 Cobb 角:模型 S(R2 = 0.39)使用术前仰卧位腰椎曲线;模型 B(R2 = 0.44)使用术前侧弯位腰椎曲线;模型 SB(R2 = 0.49)使用术前仰卧位和侧弯位腰椎曲线。结论:结论:在选择性后胸椎融合术后,无论是仰卧位还是侧弯位X光片都可用于估算术后平均残余腰椎弯曲度,但同时拍摄仰卧位和侧弯位X光片的效果甚微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信