The Randomized Controlled Study of Low-Level Laser Therapy, Kinesio-Taping and Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients With Stage II Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
{"title":"The Randomized Controlled Study of Low-Level Laser Therapy, Kinesio-Taping and Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients With Stage II Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.","authors":"Sedef Selcuk Yilmaz, Fikriye Figen Ayhan","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-6-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of low-level laser therapy, kinesio-taping and manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) on the affected arm volume, quality of life, arm function, neuropathic pain and shoulder mobility in patients with stage II breast cancer-related lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five breast cancer patients with stage II lymphedema were included. The patients were randomized to three groups and treated with MLD, kinesio-taping or low-level laser therapy. After these different therapeutic modalities, all patients received multilayer compression bandaging, lymphedema remedial exercises, skin care, and a patient education program by the same lymphedema therapist. All treatments were applied 5-days a week for three weeks. The lymphedema compression garments were prescribed to all patients and follow-up visits were planned at the end of the treatment, and at four and 12 weeks. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated by volumetric calculations based on circumferential measurements using the formula for a truncated cone, in addition to goniometric assessments for shoulder joint ROM, and questionnaires: Quick-disability of arm, shoulder and hand for arm disability; pain-detect for neuropathic pain; and quality of life for arm lymphedema (LYMQOL-arm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline patient and disease characteristics, and outcome measures were similar between groups. All treatment modalities were found to be effective in decreasing arm volume, and improving quality of life, upper extremity disability and neuropathic pain. The percentage of decreased arm volume or treatment success was better in kinesio-taping group than in the MLD group at the end of the treatment, and at four and 12 weeks after treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.009, <i>p</i> = 0.039, and <i>p</i> = 0.042, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kinesio-taping led to better results than MLD and was similarly effective compared with low-level laser in stage II breast cancer-related lymphedema at the twelfth week of follow-up. Kinesio-taping and low-level laser should be considered as alternative treatments in early-moderate stages of lymphedema. After these modalities, multi-layer compression and compression bandaging remain cornerstones of lymphedema treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11885,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":"19 1","pages":"34-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806938/pdf/ejbh-19-34.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-6-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of low-level laser therapy, kinesio-taping and manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) on the affected arm volume, quality of life, arm function, neuropathic pain and shoulder mobility in patients with stage II breast cancer-related lymphedema.
Materials and methods: Forty-five breast cancer patients with stage II lymphedema were included. The patients were randomized to three groups and treated with MLD, kinesio-taping or low-level laser therapy. After these different therapeutic modalities, all patients received multilayer compression bandaging, lymphedema remedial exercises, skin care, and a patient education program by the same lymphedema therapist. All treatments were applied 5-days a week for three weeks. The lymphedema compression garments were prescribed to all patients and follow-up visits were planned at the end of the treatment, and at four and 12 weeks. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated by volumetric calculations based on circumferential measurements using the formula for a truncated cone, in addition to goniometric assessments for shoulder joint ROM, and questionnaires: Quick-disability of arm, shoulder and hand for arm disability; pain-detect for neuropathic pain; and quality of life for arm lymphedema (LYMQOL-arm).
Results: The baseline patient and disease characteristics, and outcome measures were similar between groups. All treatment modalities were found to be effective in decreasing arm volume, and improving quality of life, upper extremity disability and neuropathic pain. The percentage of decreased arm volume or treatment success was better in kinesio-taping group than in the MLD group at the end of the treatment, and at four and 12 weeks after treatment (p = 0.009, p = 0.039, and p = 0.042, respectively).
Conclusion: Kinesio-taping led to better results than MLD and was similarly effective compared with low-level laser in stage II breast cancer-related lymphedema at the twelfth week of follow-up. Kinesio-taping and low-level laser should be considered as alternative treatments in early-moderate stages of lymphedema. After these modalities, multi-layer compression and compression bandaging remain cornerstones of lymphedema treatment.
目的:比较低水平激光治疗、运动贴敷和手工淋巴引流(MLD)对II期乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者患臂体积、生活质量、手臂功能、神经性疼痛和肩关节活动度的影响。材料和方法:纳入45例伴有II期淋巴水肿的乳腺癌患者。患者被随机分为三组,分别接受MLD、运动贴敷或低水平激光治疗。在这些不同的治疗方式之后,所有患者都接受了多层压缩绷带、淋巴水肿治疗练习、皮肤护理和由同一淋巴水肿治疗师进行的患者教育计划。所有治疗均为每周5天,连续3周。给所有患者开了淋巴水肿压缩服,并计划在治疗结束时、4周和12周进行随访。除了肩关节ROM的角度评估外,还通过基于周向测量的体积计算来评估治疗效果,并通过问卷调查来评估治疗效果:手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾;神经性疼痛的疼痛检测;和手臂淋巴水肿(LYMQOL-arm)的生活质量。结果:两组之间的基线患者和疾病特征以及结局指标相似。所有治疗方式均能有效减少上肢体积,改善生活质量,改善上肢残疾和神经性疼痛。在治疗结束时,以及治疗后4周和12周,运动贴膜组手臂体积减小或治疗成功率的百分比均优于MLD组(p = 0.009, p = 0.039, p = 0.042)。结论:在随访第12周时,运动贴敷治疗II期乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的效果优于MLD,与低水平激光治疗相比效果相似。运动贴敷和低强度激光可作为中早期淋巴水肿的替代治疗方法。经过这些方式,多层压迫和压迫包扎仍然是淋巴水肿治疗的基础。