Comparing the Efficiency of Imaging Modalities in Detection of Recurrent Breast Cancer.

Seda Aladag Kurt, Yasemin Kayadibi, Ahmet Bas, Tulin Ozturk, Pinar Kocael
{"title":"Comparing the Efficiency of Imaging Modalities in Detection of Recurrent Breast Cancer.","authors":"Seda Aladag Kurt,&nbsp;Yasemin Kayadibi,&nbsp;Ahmet Bas,&nbsp;Tulin Ozturk,&nbsp;Pinar Kocael","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-10-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of the different imaging modalities in detecting recurrence in breast cancer follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-four women with recurrent breast cancer were examined between January 2020 and July 2022. Recurrency was divided into four categories: local; regional; second primary; and distant metastasis. The detectability of recurrent lesions with mammography (MG), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was evaluated. In addition, recurrences that firstly appeared by positron emission tomography (PET) scan were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven (42.2%) recurrences were local, 10 (15.6%) were regional and 27 (42.2%) were second primary. Forty-six (71.9%) of them were determined to have invasive carcinoma, 8 (12.5%) were ductal carcinoma in situ, and 10 (15.6%) were axillary metastases. Eight (12.5%) of them were first diagnosed by PET-computed tomography/MRI. Among the available images performed, 78.7% could be detected pathologically by MG, 95.2% by US, and 100% by MRI. Distant metastasis associated with other types of recurrence was detected in 6 (9.4%) cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI is the most powerful imaging modality in detecting recurrent breast cancer. With the addition of US to routine MG follow-up, a higher rate and early detection of recurrent cancers can be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":11885,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806942/pdf/ejbh-19-85.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-10-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the different imaging modalities in detecting recurrence in breast cancer follow-up.

Materials and methods: Sixty-four women with recurrent breast cancer were examined between January 2020 and July 2022. Recurrency was divided into four categories: local; regional; second primary; and distant metastasis. The detectability of recurrent lesions with mammography (MG), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was evaluated. In addition, recurrences that firstly appeared by positron emission tomography (PET) scan were recorded.

Results: Twenty-seven (42.2%) recurrences were local, 10 (15.6%) were regional and 27 (42.2%) were second primary. Forty-six (71.9%) of them were determined to have invasive carcinoma, 8 (12.5%) were ductal carcinoma in situ, and 10 (15.6%) were axillary metastases. Eight (12.5%) of them were first diagnosed by PET-computed tomography/MRI. Among the available images performed, 78.7% could be detected pathologically by MG, 95.2% by US, and 100% by MRI. Distant metastasis associated with other types of recurrence was detected in 6 (9.4%) cases.

Conclusion: MRI is the most powerful imaging modality in detecting recurrent breast cancer. With the addition of US to routine MG follow-up, a higher rate and early detection of recurrent cancers can be achieved.

不同影像学方式对复发性乳腺癌的检测效果比较。
目的:探讨不同影像学方式在乳腺癌随访中发现复发的有效性。材料和方法:在2020年1月至2022年7月期间对64名复发性乳腺癌妇女进行了检查。复发分为四类:局部复发;区域;第二主;以及远处转移。评估乳房x线摄影(MG)、超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)对复发性病变的可检出性。此外,还记录了通过正电子发射断层扫描(PET)首次出现的复发。结果:局部27例(42.2%),局部10例(15.6%),二次原发27例(42.2%)。其中浸润性癌46例(71.9%),导管原位癌8例(12.5%),腋窝转移癌10例(15.6%)。其中8例(12.5%)首次通过pet计算机断层扫描/MRI诊断。其中,78.7%的MG、95.2%的US和100%的MRI均可检出病变。6例(9.4%)发现远处转移伴其他类型复发。结论:MRI是诊断复发性乳腺癌最有效的影像学手段。在常规MG随访的基础上增加US,可以提高癌症复发率和早期发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信