Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Repair for Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tears

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Repair for Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tears","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated with surgical repair of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The study was a retrospective review of repairs of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon performed by multiple surgeons from January 1, 2015 to October 15, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging indicative of distal biceps pathology without a complete tear and surgical treatment with intraoperative confirmation of a partial tear. The presence of preceding trauma, duration of symptoms, and postoperative complications were documented. Patients were contacted for outcome assessment using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (</span><em>Quick</em>DASH) and Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation outcome measures. Clinical outcomes were obtained from 56 of 74 (76%) eligible patients with an average follow-up of 46 months (range: 15–85 months).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After surgery, the median <em>Quick</em>DASH was 2.3 (interquartile range, 0–9.7), and the median Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation score was 1 (interquartile range, 0–12). Postoperative <em>Quick</em><span><span>DASH scores were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. Known traumas preceding the symptoms and duration of symptoms before surgery were not significantly associated with the outcome. Of all eligible patients, 30 complications were reported in 25 (34%) patients and included 2 reruptures, 2 cases of heterotopic ossification, 1 deep infection, 1 case of implant irritation, 21 neuropraxias, and 3 hematomas. Five (7%) patients underwent 6 </span>reoperations<span> including 1 revision for a rerupture, 1 irrigation and debridement<span>, 2 heterotopic ossification excisions, 1 hematoma evacuation, and 1 implant removal.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results suggest that the repair of partial distal biceps tendon tears is a viable treatment option with significant improvement in <em>Quick</em>DASH. There was no significant relationship between the postoperative outcome and duration of symptoms or known traumas preceding the symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><p>Therapeutic IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502322007171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated with surgical repair of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon.

Methods

The study was a retrospective review of repairs of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon performed by multiple surgeons from January 1, 2015 to October 15, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging indicative of distal biceps pathology without a complete tear and surgical treatment with intraoperative confirmation of a partial tear. The presence of preceding trauma, duration of symptoms, and postoperative complications were documented. Patients were contacted for outcome assessment using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation outcome measures. Clinical outcomes were obtained from 56 of 74 (76%) eligible patients with an average follow-up of 46 months (range: 15–85 months).

Results

After surgery, the median QuickDASH was 2.3 (interquartile range, 0–9.7), and the median Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation score was 1 (interquartile range, 0–12). Postoperative QuickDASH scores were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. Known traumas preceding the symptoms and duration of symptoms before surgery were not significantly associated with the outcome. Of all eligible patients, 30 complications were reported in 25 (34%) patients and included 2 reruptures, 2 cases of heterotopic ossification, 1 deep infection, 1 case of implant irritation, 21 neuropraxias, and 3 hematomas. Five (7%) patients underwent 6 reoperations including 1 revision for a rerupture, 1 irrigation and debridement, 2 heterotopic ossification excisions, 1 hematoma evacuation, and 1 implant removal.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the repair of partial distal biceps tendon tears is a viable treatment option with significant improvement in QuickDASH. There was no significant relationship between the postoperative outcome and duration of symptoms or known traumas preceding the symptoms.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

肱二头肌远端肌腱部分撕裂手术修复的临床效果。
目的:本研究旨在描述肱二头肌远端肌腱部分撕裂手术修复患者的治疗效果:该研究对 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 15 日期间由多名外科医生实施的肱二头肌远端肌腱部分撕裂修复术进行了回顾性审查。纳入标准包括术前磁共振成像显示肱二头肌远端病变但未完全撕裂,以及术中确认部分撕裂的手术治疗。之前是否有外伤、症状持续时间和术后并发症均记录在案。使用 "手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评估"(QuickDASH)和 "患者报告肘部评估"(Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation)进行结果评估,并与患者取得联系。74名符合条件的患者中有56名(76%)获得了临床结果,平均随访46个月(范围:15-85个月):手术后,QuickDASH 评分的中位数为 2.3(四分位数间距为 0-9.7),"患者报告肘部评估 "评分的中位数为 1(四分位数间距为 0-12)。术后的QuickDASH评分明显低于术前评分。出现症状前已知的外伤和手术前症状持续时间与结果无明显关联。在所有符合条件的患者中,有25名患者(34%)报告了30例并发症,包括2例骨再破裂、2例异位骨化、1例深部感染、1例植入物刺激、21例神经错乱和3例血肿。5名(7%)患者接受了6次再手术,包括1次再破裂翻修、1次冲洗和清创、2次异位骨化切除、1次血肿清除和1次植入物取出:结果表明,修复部分肱二头肌远端肌腱撕裂是一种可行的治疗方案,可显著改善 QuickDASH。术后结果与症状持续时间或症状前的已知创伤之间没有明显关系:治疗 IV.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信