Access, Safety, and Barriers in Adoption of Emergency Laparoscopy Surgery for Trauma Patients in a Low-Resource Setting.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1761951
Rahul Kumar, Arpan Mishra, Harikrishna Damde, Prasant Yadav, Sanjay Kumar Yadav
{"title":"Access, Safety, and Barriers in Adoption of Emergency Laparoscopy Surgery for Trauma Patients in a Low-Resource Setting.","authors":"Rahul Kumar,&nbsp;Arpan Mishra,&nbsp;Harikrishna Damde,&nbsp;Prasant Yadav,&nbsp;Sanjay Kumar Yadav","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1761951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  This study analyzes barriers to the adoption of emergency laparoscopy (EL), safety, and accessibility in a low-resource setting of a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). <b>Methods</b>  In this prospective observational study, patients with blunt trauma abdomen (BTA) who required exploration were included and divided into two groups-open exploration (open surgery [OSx]) and laparoscopic exploration (laparoscopic surgery [LSx]). Data were compiled and analyzed. <b>Results</b>  Out of 94 BTA patients, 66 required exploration, and the rest were managed conservatively. Out of 66 patients, 42 were in OSx and 24 were in LSx, reason for not selecting LSx was the surgeon's preference for OSx in 26 patients and the lack of availability of operation theater (OT) slots in 16 patients. LSx even after indication was less likely if patients had preoperative evidence of perforation peritonitis. <b>Conclusion</b>  Lack of resources (OT availability and trained personnel) are barriers to the adoption of emergency LSx in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984267/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction  This study analyzes barriers to the adoption of emergency laparoscopy (EL), safety, and accessibility in a low-resource setting of a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). Methods  In this prospective observational study, patients with blunt trauma abdomen (BTA) who required exploration were included and divided into two groups-open exploration (open surgery [OSx]) and laparoscopic exploration (laparoscopic surgery [LSx]). Data were compiled and analyzed. Results  Out of 94 BTA patients, 66 required exploration, and the rest were managed conservatively. Out of 66 patients, 42 were in OSx and 24 were in LSx, reason for not selecting LSx was the surgeon's preference for OSx in 26 patients and the lack of availability of operation theater (OT) slots in 16 patients. LSx even after indication was less likely if patients had preoperative evidence of perforation peritonitis. Conclusion  Lack of resources (OT availability and trained personnel) are barriers to the adoption of emergency LSx in low-resource settings.

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
低资源环境下创伤患者急诊腹腔镜手术的可及性、安全性和障碍
本研究分析了在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)低资源环境中采用急诊腹腔镜(EL)的障碍、安全性和可及性。方法本前瞻性观察研究纳入需要探查的钝性创伤腹部(blunt trauma腹部,BTA)患者,分为开放探查(open surgery [OSx])和腹腔镜探查(腹腔镜手术[LSx])两组。对数据进行整理和分析。结果94例BTA患者中,66例需要探查,其余采用保守治疗。66例患者中,42例在OSx, 24例在LSx,未选择LSx的原因是26例患者的外科医生偏爱OSx, 16例患者缺乏手术室(OT)空位。即使在指征后,如果患者术前有穿孔性腹膜炎的证据,LSx的可能性也较小。结论缺乏资源(可获得的OT和训练有素的人员)是在资源匮乏的环境中采用紧急LSx的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信