Community antibiotic management of skin infections in the Torres Strait.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Allison Hempenstall, Pelista Pilot, Malcolm McDonald, Simon Smith, Josh Hanson
{"title":"Community antibiotic management of skin infections in the Torres Strait.","authors":"Allison Hempenstall,&nbsp;Pelista Pilot,&nbsp;Malcolm McDonald,&nbsp;Simon Smith,&nbsp;Josh Hanson","doi":"10.1071/PY22142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a high burden of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) - including cellulitis - among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in remote communities. In tropical environments, such as the Torres Strait, cellulitis accounts for 37% of potentially preventable hospitalisations. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and community acceptance of outpatient antibiotic treatment for the management of skin infections in the Torres Strait.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient management of skin infection in the Torres Strait is effective, safe and appreciated by patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a 12-month prospective, observational study commencing in January 2019 involving 295 adults with a skin infection across the Torres Strait.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (276/295 (94%)) participants were treated successfully in the community. Of 295 enrolled patients, 151 of 295 (51%) had cellulitis, 59 of 295 (20%) had a skin abscess and 85 of 295 (28%) had a wound infection. Of the 77 of 278 (27%) infections accompanied by systemic features, 63 of 77 (82%) were managed in the community. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent isolate, at 165 of 261 (63%); 56 of 165 (33%) were methicillin resistant. In the 276 community-managed cases, oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was initially used in 159 (57%), oral flucloxacillin in 75 (27%) and intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid in 32 (13%). The clinical course was complicated in eight of 232 (3%) patients who had complete follow-up data: seven patients required hospitalisation after initial treatment in the communityand one had an antibiotic side-effect. All 232 patients with complete follow-up data were content with the care they received.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"29 1","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There is a high burden of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) - including cellulitis - among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in remote communities. In tropical environments, such as the Torres Strait, cellulitis accounts for 37% of potentially preventable hospitalisations. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and community acceptance of outpatient antibiotic treatment for the management of skin infections in the Torres Strait.

Conclusions: Outpatient management of skin infection in the Torres Strait is effective, safe and appreciated by patients.

Methods: This was a 12-month prospective, observational study commencing in January 2019 involving 295 adults with a skin infection across the Torres Strait.

Results: Most (276/295 (94%)) participants were treated successfully in the community. Of 295 enrolled patients, 151 of 295 (51%) had cellulitis, 59 of 295 (20%) had a skin abscess and 85 of 295 (28%) had a wound infection. Of the 77 of 278 (27%) infections accompanied by systemic features, 63 of 77 (82%) were managed in the community. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent isolate, at 165 of 261 (63%); 56 of 165 (33%) were methicillin resistant. In the 276 community-managed cases, oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was initially used in 159 (57%), oral flucloxacillin in 75 (27%) and intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid in 32 (13%). The clinical course was complicated in eight of 232 (3%) patients who had complete follow-up data: seven patients required hospitalisation after initial treatment in the communityand one had an antibiotic side-effect. All 232 patients with complete follow-up data were content with the care they received.

托雷斯海峡皮肤感染的社区抗生素管理。
背景:居住在偏远社区的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)负担很高,包括蜂窝组织炎。在热带环境中,如托雷斯海峡,蜂窝组织炎占本可预防住院的37%。本研究旨在评估托雷斯海峡地区门诊抗生素治疗皮肤感染的安全性、有效性和社区接受度。结论:托勒斯海峡皮肤感染的门诊治疗有效、安全,受到患者的好评。方法:这是一项为期12个月的前瞻性观察性研究,于2019年1月开始,涉及295名患有托雷斯海峡对岸皮肤感染的成年人。结果:大多数(276/295(94%))参与者在社区治疗成功。295例入组患者中,151例(51%)有蜂窝织炎,59例(20%)有皮肤脓肿,85例(28%)有伤口感染。278例感染中有77例(27%)伴有全身特征,77例中有63例(82%)在社区得到处理。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离物,261例中有165例(63%);165例中有56例(33%)耐甲氧西林。276例社区管理病例中,159例(57%)最初使用口服甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑,75例(27%)口服氟氯西林,32例(13%)静脉注射头孢唑林加口服丙苯酸。有完整随访数据的232例患者中,有8例(3%)患者的临床病程复杂:7例患者在社区初始治疗后需要住院治疗,1例出现抗生素副作用。所有232例随访数据完整的患者均对所接受的治疗感到满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信