Women's ability to negotiate safer sex with partners by contraceptive status among a nationally representative sample of married women in Nigeria.

Bola Lukman Solanke, Joseph Ayodeji Kupoluyi, Abayomi Folorunso Awoleye, Olusola Esther Adewole, Oyeyemi Bukola Babalola
{"title":"Women's ability to negotiate safer sex with partners by contraceptive status among a nationally representative sample of married women in Nigeria.","authors":"Bola Lukman Solanke,&nbsp;Joseph Ayodeji Kupoluyi,&nbsp;Abayomi Folorunso Awoleye,&nbsp;Olusola Esther Adewole,&nbsp;Oyeyemi Bukola Babalola","doi":"10.1186/s40834-023-00214-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing studies established that safer sex negotiation influences contraceptive use, and women who are able to negotiate safer sex were expected to be contraceptive users. However, it is not certain that all contraceptive users have the ability to negotiate safer sex. Likewise, there is no evidence that all non-users are not able to negotiate safer sex with partners. The study assesses the prevalence of women's ability to negotiate safer sex and examines the determinants of women's ability to negotiate safer sex among contraceptive users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The comparative cross-sectional research design was adopted. Data were extracted from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. The study analyzed a sample of 2,765 contraceptive users and 20,304 non-users. The outcome variable was women's ability to negotiate safer sex with partners. The explanatory variables examined are eight socio-demographic characteristics (age, child marriage, education, parity, media exposure, religion, work status, and experience of female genital mutilation), six relational characteristics (healthcare autonomy, financial autonomy, household wealth quintile, partners' education, ownership of assets, and type of marriage). Attitude to wife-beating, male controlling behavior, place of residence, and geo-political zone of residence were included as control variables. Multivariable regression models were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings showed that 6.2% of women who were not able to negotiate safer sex were contraceptive users, while 15.9% of women who were able to negotiate safer sex were contraceptive users. Among non-users, the significant determinants were child marriage, education, parity, mass media exposure, religion, work status, healthcare autonomy, financial autonomy, household wealth, partner education, type of marriage, geo-political zone, attitude to wife-beating, and male controlling behavior. Regarding contraceptive users, the significant determinants were parity, religion, the experience of female genital mutilation, financial autonomy, partner education, type of marriage, and the geo-political zone of residence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to negotiate safer sex differs among contraceptive users and non-users. Also, the determinants of the ability to negotiate safer sex differ among contraceptive users and non-users. While existing strategies may continue to focus on women not using contraceptives, new strategies promoting reproductive autonomy are required among contraceptive users.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976491/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00214-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Existing studies established that safer sex negotiation influences contraceptive use, and women who are able to negotiate safer sex were expected to be contraceptive users. However, it is not certain that all contraceptive users have the ability to negotiate safer sex. Likewise, there is no evidence that all non-users are not able to negotiate safer sex with partners. The study assesses the prevalence of women's ability to negotiate safer sex and examines the determinants of women's ability to negotiate safer sex among contraceptive users and non-users.

Methods: The comparative cross-sectional research design was adopted. Data were extracted from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. The study analyzed a sample of 2,765 contraceptive users and 20,304 non-users. The outcome variable was women's ability to negotiate safer sex with partners. The explanatory variables examined are eight socio-demographic characteristics (age, child marriage, education, parity, media exposure, religion, work status, and experience of female genital mutilation), six relational characteristics (healthcare autonomy, financial autonomy, household wealth quintile, partners' education, ownership of assets, and type of marriage). Attitude to wife-beating, male controlling behavior, place of residence, and geo-political zone of residence were included as control variables. Multivariable regression models were estimated.

Results: Findings showed that 6.2% of women who were not able to negotiate safer sex were contraceptive users, while 15.9% of women who were able to negotiate safer sex were contraceptive users. Among non-users, the significant determinants were child marriage, education, parity, mass media exposure, religion, work status, healthcare autonomy, financial autonomy, household wealth, partner education, type of marriage, geo-political zone, attitude to wife-beating, and male controlling behavior. Regarding contraceptive users, the significant determinants were parity, religion, the experience of female genital mutilation, financial autonomy, partner education, type of marriage, and the geo-political zone of residence.

Conclusion: The ability to negotiate safer sex differs among contraceptive users and non-users. Also, the determinants of the ability to negotiate safer sex differ among contraceptive users and non-users. While existing strategies may continue to focus on women not using contraceptives, new strategies promoting reproductive autonomy are required among contraceptive users.

Abstract Image

在尼日利亚一项具有全国代表性的已婚妇女抽样调查中,妇女通过避孕状况与伴侣协商安全性行为的能力。
背景:现有研究证实,安全性行为谈判影响避孕药具的使用,有能力谈判安全性行为的妇女有望成为避孕药具使用者。然而,并非所有避孕药具使用者都有能力协商安全性行为。同样,没有证据表明所有非使用者都不能与伴侣协商安全性行为。这项研究评估了妇女协商安全性行为能力的普遍程度,并审查了妇女在避孕药具使用者和非使用者之间协商安全性行为能力的决定因素。方法:采用比较横断面研究设计。数据摘自2018年尼日利亚人口与健康调查。该研究分析了2765名避孕药使用者和20304名非避孕药使用者的样本。结果变量是女性与伴侣协商安全性行为的能力。研究的解释变量是8个社会人口特征(年龄、童婚、教育、平等、媒体曝光、宗教、工作状态和女性生殖器切割的经历),6个关系特征(医疗自主、财务自主、家庭财富五分位数、伴侣的教育程度、资产所有权和婚姻类型)。控制变量包括对殴打妻子的态度、男性控制行为、居住地和居住地地理政治区域。对多变量回归模型进行估计。结果:调查结果显示,无法协商安全性行为的妇女中有6.2%是避孕药具使用者,而能够协商安全性行为的妇女中有15.9%是避孕药具使用者。在非使用者中,重要的决定因素是童婚、教育、性别平等、大众媒体曝光、宗教、工作状态、医疗自主、财务自主、家庭财富、伴侣教育、婚姻类型、地缘政治区域、对殴打妻子的态度和男性控制行为。关于避孕药具使用者,重要的决定因素是均等、宗教、女性生殖器切割的经历、财政自主、伴侣教育、婚姻类型和居住地的地缘政治区域。结论:避孕药具使用者与非避孕药具使用者协商安全性行为的能力不同。此外,避孕药具使用者和非使用者之间协商安全性行为能力的决定因素有所不同。虽然现有战略可能继续以不使用避孕药具的妇女为重点,但需要制定新的战略,促进避孕药具使用者的生殖自主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信