Comparative evaluation of bioactivity, fluoride release, shear bond strength, and compressive strength of conventional glass ionomer cement incorporated with three inorganic bioactive nanoparticles: An experimental analysis.

Q3 Dentistry
Pranjali Mahesh Pokharkar, N D Shashikiran, Namrata Gaonkar, Sachin Gugawad, Savita Hadakar, Sonali Waghmode
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of bioactivity, fluoride release, shear bond strength, and compressive strength of conventional glass ionomer cement incorporated with three inorganic bioactive nanoparticles: An experimental analysis.","authors":"Pranjali Mahesh Pokharkar,&nbsp;N D Shashikiran,&nbsp;Namrata Gaonkar,&nbsp;Sachin Gugawad,&nbsp;Savita Hadakar,&nbsp;Sonali Waghmode","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_454_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the course of four decades, the bioactive materials have changed. They have become more specialized, more manageable, possessing superior qualities. Thus, it should be encouraged to conduct ongoing research to improve these materials even further in order to meet the growing clinical and restorative needs.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare bioactivity, fluoride release, shear bond strength and compressive strength of conventional GIC incorporated with three inorganic bioactive nanoparticles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For the study, total of 160 samples were included. The samples were divided in four groups (40 samples per group) i.e. 3 wt% of forsterite (Mg2SiO4) (Group 2), wollastonite (CaSiO3) (Group 3) and niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5) (Group 4) nanoparticles incorporated into GIC (Group 1). The bioactivity (FEG-SEM and EDX analysis), fluoride release (ion-selective electrode), shear bond strength testing (UTM followed by evaluation under stereomicroscope) and the compressive strength (UTM) was checked for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wollastonite nanoparticles (3wt %) incorporated to GIC showed maximum increase in the apatite crystal formation,Ca and P content and highest fluoride release. Mean shear bond strength was highest in niobium pentoxide nanoparticles (3wt %) incorporated to GIC while mean compressive strength was highest in forsterite nanoparticles (3wt %) added to GIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive results were observed which showed increase in the bioactivity alongwith enhancement of the fluoride release, shear bond strength and compressive strength but further research on these materials is warranted before its use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":35797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"40 4","pages":"445-452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_454_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Over the course of four decades, the bioactive materials have changed. They have become more specialized, more manageable, possessing superior qualities. Thus, it should be encouraged to conduct ongoing research to improve these materials even further in order to meet the growing clinical and restorative needs.

Aims and objectives: To evaluate and compare bioactivity, fluoride release, shear bond strength and compressive strength of conventional GIC incorporated with three inorganic bioactive nanoparticles.

Materials and methods: For the study, total of 160 samples were included. The samples were divided in four groups (40 samples per group) i.e. 3 wt% of forsterite (Mg2SiO4) (Group 2), wollastonite (CaSiO3) (Group 3) and niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5) (Group 4) nanoparticles incorporated into GIC (Group 1). The bioactivity (FEG-SEM and EDX analysis), fluoride release (ion-selective electrode), shear bond strength testing (UTM followed by evaluation under stereomicroscope) and the compressive strength (UTM) was checked for each group.

Results: Wollastonite nanoparticles (3wt %) incorporated to GIC showed maximum increase in the apatite crystal formation,Ca and P content and highest fluoride release. Mean shear bond strength was highest in niobium pentoxide nanoparticles (3wt %) incorporated to GIC while mean compressive strength was highest in forsterite nanoparticles (3wt %) added to GIC.

Conclusion: Positive results were observed which showed increase in the bioactivity alongwith enhancement of the fluoride release, shear bond strength and compressive strength but further research on these materials is warranted before its use in clinical practice.

三种无机生物活性纳米颗粒掺入常规玻璃离聚体水泥的生物活性、氟释放、剪切结合强度和抗压强度的比较评价:一项实验分析
背景:在过去的四十年中,生物活性物质发生了变化。他们变得更专业,更容易管理,拥有更优越的品质。因此,应该鼓励进行正在进行的研究,以进一步改进这些材料,以满足日益增长的临床和修复需求。目的和目的:评价和比较三种无机生物活性纳米颗粒掺入常规GIC的生物活性、氟释放、剪切键合强度和抗压强度。材料与方法:本研究共纳入160份样本。样品被分为四组(每组40个样品),即3 wt%的forsterite (Mg2SiO4)(第2组),硅灰石(CaSiO3组)(第3组)和五氧化二铌(Nb2O5组)纳米颗粒加入GIC(第1组)。生物活性(fg - sem和EDX分析),氟释放(离子选择电极),剪切强度测试(UTM在体视显微镜下评估)和抗压强度(UTM)检查每组。结果:硅灰石纳米颗粒(3wt %)掺入GIC后,磷灰石晶体形成、钙、磷含量和氟化物释放量均显著增加。加入GIC的五氧化铌纳米颗粒(3wt %)的平均剪切强度最高,而加入GIC的forsterite纳米颗粒(3wt %)的平均抗压强度最高。结论:该材料的生物活性随着氟化物释放量、剪切结合强度和抗压强度的增加而增加,但在临床应用前还需进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry (ISSN - 0970-4388) is the official organ of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. The journal publishes original articles and case reports pertaining to pediatric and preventive dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信