[A retrospective comparative study between robotic thyroidectomy through transoral vestibular approach and bilateral breast-axillary approach].

C Y Li, Q Q He, X L Li, J Yuan, D Y Zhuang, P Zhou, T Yue, Y X Liu, C X Shao, J Xu
{"title":"[A retrospective comparative study between robotic thyroidectomy through transoral vestibular approach and bilateral breast-axillary approach].","authors":"C Y Li,&nbsp;Q Q He,&nbsp;X L Li,&nbsp;J Yuan,&nbsp;D Y Zhuang,&nbsp;P Zhou,&nbsp;T Yue,&nbsp;Y X Liu,&nbsp;C X Shao,&nbsp;J Xu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220810-00348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the surgical outcome of robotic thyroidectomy through transoral approach and the bilateral breast-axillary approach. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of patients who performed transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT group) or bilateral breast-axillary approach (BABA group) in the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army from July 2020 to May 2022. Both groups received lobectomy with lymph node dissection of the central region. A total of 100 cases were included in the study, including 48 cases in the TORT group and 52 cases in the BABA group. The propensity score matching method was used for 1∶1 matching of patients between the 2 groups, with a match tolerance of 0.03. There were 31 patients in each group successfully matched. In the TORT group, there were 5 males and 26 females, aged (33.2±7.9) years (range: 21 to 53 years). While there were 4 males and 27 females in the BABA group, aged (34.6±9.2) years (range: 19 to 58 years). The <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test or Fisher exact test were used to compare the clinical efficacy between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> All the patients successfully completed robotic thyroid surgery without conversion to open surgery. Compared with BABA group, the TORT group had longer operation time ((211.3±57.2) minutes <i>vs.</i> (126.2±37.8) minutes, <i>t</i>=6.915, <i>P</i><0.01), shorter drainage tube retention time ((5.4±1.0) days <i>vs.</i> (6.4±1.2) days, <i>t</i>=-3.544, <i>P</i>=0.001), shorter total hospital stay ((6.6±1.2) days <i>vs.</i> (7.4±1.3) days, <i>t</i>=-2.353, <i>P</i>=0.022), and higher cosmetic score (9.46±0.25 <i>vs.</i> 9.27±0.26, <i>t</i>=2.925, <i>P</i>=0.005). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes dissection, metastasis in the central compartment, and the incidence of postoperative complications (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with the bilateral breast-axillary approach, the transoral vestibular approach of robotic thyroidectomy is also safe and effective. It shows similar surgical results to the bilateral breast-axillary approach in strictly selected patients, but the postoperative recovery speed is much faster, and the hospital stay is shorter. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy is a more recommended surgical method for patients with high aesthetic demand.</p>","PeriodicalId":23966,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","volume":"61 3","pages":"227-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220810-00348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the surgical outcome of robotic thyroidectomy through transoral approach and the bilateral breast-axillary approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of patients who performed transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT group) or bilateral breast-axillary approach (BABA group) in the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army from July 2020 to May 2022. Both groups received lobectomy with lymph node dissection of the central region. A total of 100 cases were included in the study, including 48 cases in the TORT group and 52 cases in the BABA group. The propensity score matching method was used for 1∶1 matching of patients between the 2 groups, with a match tolerance of 0.03. There were 31 patients in each group successfully matched. In the TORT group, there were 5 males and 26 females, aged (33.2±7.9) years (range: 21 to 53 years). While there were 4 males and 27 females in the BABA group, aged (34.6±9.2) years (range: 19 to 58 years). The t test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test or Fisher exact test were used to compare the clinical efficacy between the two groups. Results: All the patients successfully completed robotic thyroid surgery without conversion to open surgery. Compared with BABA group, the TORT group had longer operation time ((211.3±57.2) minutes vs. (126.2±37.8) minutes, t=6.915, P<0.01), shorter drainage tube retention time ((5.4±1.0) days vs. (6.4±1.2) days, t=-3.544, P=0.001), shorter total hospital stay ((6.6±1.2) days vs. (7.4±1.3) days, t=-2.353, P=0.022), and higher cosmetic score (9.46±0.25 vs. 9.27±0.26, t=2.925, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes dissection, metastasis in the central compartment, and the incidence of postoperative complications (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the bilateral breast-axillary approach, the transoral vestibular approach of robotic thyroidectomy is also safe and effective. It shows similar surgical results to the bilateral breast-axillary approach in strictly selected patients, but the postoperative recovery speed is much faster, and the hospital stay is shorter. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy is a more recommended surgical method for patients with high aesthetic demand.

[经口前庭入路与双侧乳腺腋窝入路机器人甲状腺切除术的回顾性比较研究]。
目的:比较经口入路与双侧乳腺腋窝入路机器人甲状腺切除术的手术效果。方法:回顾性分析解放军第960医院甲状腺乳房外科2020年7月至2022年5月行经口机器人甲状腺切除术(TORT组)或双侧乳房腋窝入路(BABA组)患者的临床资料。两组均行肺叶切除术合并中央淋巴结清扫。本研究共纳入100例,其中TORT组48例,BABA组52例。两组患者采用倾向评分匹配法进行1∶1匹配,匹配容差为0.03。两组均有31例患者匹配成功。TORT组男性5例,女性26例,年龄(33.2±7.9)岁(21 ~ 53岁)。BABA组男性4例,女性27例,年龄(34.6±9.2)岁(范围:19 ~ 58岁)。采用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、χ2检验或Fisher精确检验比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果:所有患者均顺利完成机器人甲状腺手术,未转开腹手术。与BABA组比较,TORT组手术时间更长(211.3±57.2)min vs(126.2±37.8)min, t=6.915, pv。(6.4±1.2)天,t=-3.544, P=0.001),总住院时间缩短(6.6±1.2)天比(7.4±1.3)天,t=-2.353, P=0.022),美容评分较高(9.46±0.25比9.27±0.26,t=2.925, P=0.005)。两组在中央室淋巴结清扫数、转移情况及术后并发症发生率方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与双侧乳腺腋窝入路相比,经口前庭入路行机器人甲状腺切除术安全有效。严选患者与双侧乳腺腋窝入路手术效果相近,但术后恢复速度快得多,住院时间短。对于审美要求高的患者,经口机器人甲状腺切除术是一种更推荐的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信