Prognostic Impact of Baseline Liver Metastasis in ALK Fusion-Positive Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Review.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Satvik Khaddar, Akhil Kapoor, Vanita Noronha, Vijay M Patil, Nandini Menon, Abhishek Mahajan, Amit Janu, Rajiv Kumar, Nilendu Purandare, Kumar Prabhash
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Baseline Liver Metastasis in ALK Fusion-Positive Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Satvik Khaddar,&nbsp;Akhil Kapoor,&nbsp;Vanita Noronha,&nbsp;Vijay M Patil,&nbsp;Nandini Menon,&nbsp;Abhishek Mahajan,&nbsp;Amit Janu,&nbsp;Rajiv Kumar,&nbsp;Nilendu Purandare,&nbsp;Kumar Prabhash","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Akhil Kapoor<b>Introduction</b>  The prognosis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients has improved drastically since the introduction of targeted therapies. Apart from age, performance status, and type of driver mutation in a mNSCLC, prognosis also depends on baseline metastatic sites number as well as location with liver metastases being a poor prognostic factor. However, the clinical and prognostic association of baseline liver metastases in ALK fusion-positive mNSCLC is not well known. <b>Material and Methods</b>  We performed a retrospective analysis of ALK fusion-positive mNSCLC patients to assess prognostic impact of liver metastases. Records were obtained from lung cancer audit database and electronic medical records. Patients were started on either chemotherapy, ALK-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or given best supportive care as per the clinical scenario. Radiological response was assessed every 2 to 3 months or earlier at clinical suspicion of progressive disease. Adverse events were evaluated as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.02. <b>Results</b>  A total of 441 patients were screened, out of which 76 had baseline liver metastases. Median age was 49 years with 64.5% males. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.9-19.4) in patients with baseline liver metastases. In patients who received first-line ALK inhibitor therapy versus who received first-line chemotherapy, mPFS was significantly better in the ALK-directed therapy subgroup, 15.3 months (95% CI 11.7-18.9) versus 5.9 months (95% CI 2.7-9.1), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3 [95% CI 0.17-0.54]; <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Median overall survival (mOS) was 27.6 months (95% CI 17.4-37.7) in patients with baseline liver metastases which was not statistically significant from patients without baseline liver metastases which was 32.3 months (95% CI 28.8-35.7) (HR 1.32 [95% CI 0.91-1.9]; <i>p</i>  = 0.22). Use of ALK-directed therapy in patients with baseline liver metastases resulted in better OS, mOS not reached versus 15.7 months (95% CI 2.7-28.8) in the chemotherapy group (HR 0.33 [95% CI 0.16-0.67]; <i>p</i>  < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>  In patients with ALK fusion-positive mNSCLC, baseline liver metastases was not found to be an independent prognostic factor. However, the use of ALK-directed therapy resulted in a significantly better PFS and OS as compared with chemotherapy in patients with baseline liver metastases. This underscores the importance of the use of ALK-directed therapy whenever feasible in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"11 3","pages":"243-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/fe/10-1055-s-0042-1742596.PMC9803546.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Akhil KapoorIntroduction  The prognosis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients has improved drastically since the introduction of targeted therapies. Apart from age, performance status, and type of driver mutation in a mNSCLC, prognosis also depends on baseline metastatic sites number as well as location with liver metastases being a poor prognostic factor. However, the clinical and prognostic association of baseline liver metastases in ALK fusion-positive mNSCLC is not well known. Material and Methods  We performed a retrospective analysis of ALK fusion-positive mNSCLC patients to assess prognostic impact of liver metastases. Records were obtained from lung cancer audit database and electronic medical records. Patients were started on either chemotherapy, ALK-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or given best supportive care as per the clinical scenario. Radiological response was assessed every 2 to 3 months or earlier at clinical suspicion of progressive disease. Adverse events were evaluated as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.02. Results  A total of 441 patients were screened, out of which 76 had baseline liver metastases. Median age was 49 years with 64.5% males. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.9-19.4) in patients with baseline liver metastases. In patients who received first-line ALK inhibitor therapy versus who received first-line chemotherapy, mPFS was significantly better in the ALK-directed therapy subgroup, 15.3 months (95% CI 11.7-18.9) versus 5.9 months (95% CI 2.7-9.1), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3 [95% CI 0.17-0.54]; p  < 0.001). Median overall survival (mOS) was 27.6 months (95% CI 17.4-37.7) in patients with baseline liver metastases which was not statistically significant from patients without baseline liver metastases which was 32.3 months (95% CI 28.8-35.7) (HR 1.32 [95% CI 0.91-1.9]; p  = 0.22). Use of ALK-directed therapy in patients with baseline liver metastases resulted in better OS, mOS not reached versus 15.7 months (95% CI 2.7-28.8) in the chemotherapy group (HR 0.33 [95% CI 0.16-0.67]; p  < 0.001). Conclusion  In patients with ALK fusion-positive mNSCLC, baseline liver metastases was not found to be an independent prognostic factor. However, the use of ALK-directed therapy resulted in a significantly better PFS and OS as compared with chemotherapy in patients with baseline liver metastases. This underscores the importance of the use of ALK-directed therapy whenever feasible in this group of patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基线肝转移对ALK融合阳性转移性肺癌预后的影响:回顾性回顾。
自引入靶向治疗以来,间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)融合阳性转移性非小细胞肺癌(mNSCLC)患者的预后已显著改善。除了年龄、运动状态和驱动突变类型外,小细胞肺癌的预后还取决于基线转移部位数量和位置,肝转移是一个不良预后因素。然而,在ALK融合阳性的小细胞肺癌中,基线肝转移的临床和预后关系尚不清楚。材料和方法我们对ALK融合阳性的小细胞肺癌患者进行回顾性分析,以评估肝转移对预后的影响。从肺癌审计数据库和电子病历中获取记录。患者开始接受化疗,alk导向的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,或根据临床情况给予最佳支持治疗。在临床怀疑疾病进展时,每2至3个月或更早评估一次放射反应。不良事件按照不良事件通用术语标准v4.02进行评估。结果共筛选441例患者,其中76例基线肝转移。年龄中位数为49岁,男性占64.5%。基线肝转移患者的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为14.2个月(95%可信区间[CI] 8.9-19.4)。在接受一线ALK抑制剂治疗的患者与接受一线化疗的患者中,ALK定向治疗亚组的mPFS明显更好,分别为15.3个月(95% CI 11.7-18.9)和5.9个月(95% CI 2.7-9.1)(风险比[HR] 0.3 [95% CI 0.17-0.54];P = 0.22)。在基线肝转移患者中使用alk定向治疗可获得更好的OS,未达到的mOS与化疗组的15.7个月相比(95% CI 2.7-28.8) (HR 0.33 [95% CI 0.16-0.67];结论在ALK融合阳性的小细胞肺癌患者中,基线肝转移并不是一个独立的预后因素。然而,与基线肝转移患者的化疗相比,使用alk定向治疗可显著改善PFS和OS。这强调了在这组患者中尽可能使用alk定向治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信