Overbite recognition and factors affecting esthetic tolerance among laypeople.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nattapon Boonchuay, Udom Thongudomporn, Chidchanok Leethanakul, Steven J Lindauer, Nattaporn Youravong
{"title":"Overbite recognition and factors affecting esthetic tolerance among laypeople.","authors":"Nattapon Boonchuay, Udom Thongudomporn, Chidchanok Leethanakul, Steven J Lindauer, Nattaporn Youravong","doi":"10.2319/051822-367.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine recognition ability and the levels of esthetic tolerance of deep bite and anterior open bite (AOB) among laypeople and investigate the factors affecting levels of tolerance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using a questionnaire, laypeople (N = 100) were examined, and overbite was measured. They were tested for whether they recognized deep bite and AOB. Esthetic tolerance thresholds for deep bite and AOB were selected by incremental depiction in grayscale images. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to quantify the effect of recognition and other factors (age, sex, education level, occupation, history of orthodontic treatment, interest in orthodontic treatment or retreatment, and overbite presence) affecting the tolerance of overbite problems (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 55% and 94% recognized deep bite and AOB, respectively. Participants with a deep bite were significantly more likely to esthetically tolerate deep bite compared with those without a deep bite (odds ratio [OR], 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-9.89). Participants who recognized a deep bite problem had significantly lower esthetic tolerance to deep bite compared with participants who did not recognize a deep bite (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.45). None of the other eight chosen factors significantly affected the tolerance level of AOB (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants with a deep bite or those who did not recognize a deep bite had significantly higher esthetic tolerance of deep bite than those without or those who recognized the problem (P < .05).</p>","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933563/pdf/i1945-7103-93-2-205.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/051822-367.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine recognition ability and the levels of esthetic tolerance of deep bite and anterior open bite (AOB) among laypeople and investigate the factors affecting levels of tolerance.

Materials and methods: Using a questionnaire, laypeople (N = 100) were examined, and overbite was measured. They were tested for whether they recognized deep bite and AOB. Esthetic tolerance thresholds for deep bite and AOB were selected by incremental depiction in grayscale images. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to quantify the effect of recognition and other factors (age, sex, education level, occupation, history of orthodontic treatment, interest in orthodontic treatment or retreatment, and overbite presence) affecting the tolerance of overbite problems (α = 0.05).

Results: Of the participants, 55% and 94% recognized deep bite and AOB, respectively. Participants with a deep bite were significantly more likely to esthetically tolerate deep bite compared with those without a deep bite (odds ratio [OR], 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-9.89). Participants who recognized a deep bite problem had significantly lower esthetic tolerance to deep bite compared with participants who did not recognize a deep bite (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.45). None of the other eight chosen factors significantly affected the tolerance level of AOB (P > .05).

Conclusions: Participants with a deep bite or those who did not recognize a deep bite had significantly higher esthetic tolerance of deep bite than those without or those who recognized the problem (P < .05).

非专业人士对咬合过度的认识以及影响美学容忍度的因素。
目的:确定非专业人士对深咬合和前牙开放咬合(AOB)的识别能力和美学容忍度,并研究影响容忍度的因素:确定非专业人士对深咬合和前牙开合咬合(AOB)的识别能力和美学容忍度,并研究影响容忍度的因素:采用问卷调查的方式,对非专业人士(100 人)进行了调查,并对过度咬合进行了测量。测试他们是否认识深咬合和反颌。通过灰度图像的递增描绘来选择深咬合和反颌的美学容忍阈值。采用逐步逻辑回归分析来量化识别力和其他因素(年龄、性别、教育水平、职业、正畸治疗史、对正畸治疗或再治疗的兴趣以及是否存在咬合过度)对咬合过度问题容忍度的影响(α = 0.05):在参与者中,分别有 55% 和 94% 的人认识到深咬合和 AOB。与无深咬合的参与者相比,有深咬合的参与者在审美上更容易容忍深咬合(几率比[OR],3.57;95%置信区间[CI],1.29-9.89)。认识到深咬合问题的参与者与未认识到深咬合问题的参与者相比,对深咬合的美学容忍度明显较低(OR,0.17;95% CI,0.06-0.45)。其他八个选定因素均未对AOB的耐受程度产生明显影响(P > .05):结论:有深咬合或未发现深咬合的参与者对深咬合的美学容忍度明显高于无深咬合或发现深咬合的参与者(P < .05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Angle Orthodontist
Angle Orthodontist 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信