Network-based Analysis of Prescription Opioids Dispensing Using Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs).

Hilary Aroke, Natallia Katenka, Stephen Kogut, Ashley Buchanan
{"title":"Network-based Analysis of Prescription Opioids Dispensing Using Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs).","authors":"Hilary Aroke,&nbsp;Natallia Katenka,&nbsp;Stephen Kogut,&nbsp;Ashley Buchanan","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-93413-2_59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States has been experiencing an unprecedented level of opioid overdose-related mortality due in part to excessive use of prescription opioids. Peer-driven network interventions may be beneficial. A key assumption of social network interventions is that of some members of the network act as key players and can influence the behavior of others in the network. We used opioid prescription records to create a social network of patients who use prescription opioid in the state of Rhode Island. The study population was restricted to patients on stable opioid regimens who used one source of payment and received the same opioid medication from ≥ 3 prescribers and pharmacies. An exponential random graph model (ERGM) was employed to examine the relationship between patient attributes and the likelihood of tie formation and modularity was used to assess for homophily (the tendency of individuals to associate with similar people). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of high betweenness centrality, a measure of influence within the network. 372 patients were included in the analysis; average age was 51 years; 53% were female; 57% were prescribed oxycodone, 34% were prescribed hydrocodone and 9% were prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone. After controlling for the main effects in the ERGM model, homophily was associated with age group, method of payment, number and type of opioid prescriptions filled, mean daily dose, and number of providers seen. Type of opioid and number of prescribers were identified as significant predictors of high betweenness centrality. We conclude that patients who use multiple prescribers or have a diagnosis of opioid use disorder may help promote positive health behaviors or disrupt harmful behaviors in an opioid prescription network.</p>","PeriodicalId":72653,"journal":{"name":"Complex Networks & Their Applications X. Volume 2 : proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications COMPLEX NETWORKS 2021. International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications ...","volume":"1016 ","pages":"716-730"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353743/pdf/nihms-1818955.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex Networks & Their Applications X. Volume 2 : proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications COMPLEX NETWORKS 2021. International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications ...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93413-2_59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The United States has been experiencing an unprecedented level of opioid overdose-related mortality due in part to excessive use of prescription opioids. Peer-driven network interventions may be beneficial. A key assumption of social network interventions is that of some members of the network act as key players and can influence the behavior of others in the network. We used opioid prescription records to create a social network of patients who use prescription opioid in the state of Rhode Island. The study population was restricted to patients on stable opioid regimens who used one source of payment and received the same opioid medication from ≥ 3 prescribers and pharmacies. An exponential random graph model (ERGM) was employed to examine the relationship between patient attributes and the likelihood of tie formation and modularity was used to assess for homophily (the tendency of individuals to associate with similar people). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of high betweenness centrality, a measure of influence within the network. 372 patients were included in the analysis; average age was 51 years; 53% were female; 57% were prescribed oxycodone, 34% were prescribed hydrocodone and 9% were prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone. After controlling for the main effects in the ERGM model, homophily was associated with age group, method of payment, number and type of opioid prescriptions filled, mean daily dose, and number of providers seen. Type of opioid and number of prescribers were identified as significant predictors of high betweenness centrality. We conclude that patients who use multiple prescribers or have a diagnosis of opioid use disorder may help promote positive health behaviors or disrupt harmful behaviors in an opioid prescription network.

基于指数随机图模型的处方阿片类药物配药网络分析
美国与阿片类药物过量相关的死亡率达到了前所未有的水平,部分原因是处方阿片类药物的过度使用。同伴驱动的网络干预可能是有益的。社会网络干预的一个关键假设是,网络中的一些成员充当关键角色,可以影响网络中其他人的行为。我们利用阿片类药物处方记录,为罗德岛州使用阿片类药物处方的患者创建了一个社交网络。研究人群仅限于使用稳定阿片类药物治疗方案的患者,这些患者使用一种付款来源,并从≥3个处方者和药房接受相同的阿片类药物治疗。采用指数随机图模型(ERGM)来检查患者属性与联系形成可能性之间的关系,并使用模块化来评估同质性(个体与相似人联系的倾向)。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估高中间性中心性的预测因子,这是衡量网络内影响力的一种方法。372例患者纳入分析;平均年龄51岁;女性占53%;57%的患者服用羟考酮,34%的患者服用氢可酮,9%的患者服用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮。在控制了ERGM模型中的主要效应后,同质性与年龄组、支付方式、阿片类药物处方的数量和类型、平均每日剂量和所见提供者的数量有关。阿片类药物类型和处方数量被确定为高中间性中心性的显著预测因子。我们的结论是,使用多个处方者或被诊断为阿片类药物使用障碍的患者可能有助于促进阿片类药物处方网络中的积极健康行为或破坏有害行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信