The role of language barriers on efficacy of rapid response teams.

Q2 Medicine
Lauren Raff, Carlton Moore, Evan Raff
{"title":"The role of language barriers on efficacy of rapid response teams.","authors":"Lauren Raff,&nbsp;Carlton Moore,&nbsp;Evan Raff","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2022.2150416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rapid response (RR) systems are associated with decreased hospital mortality. Systemic biases and inequities can negatively impact RR outcomes. Language barriers between patients and providers are associated with worse outcomes, but it is unknown if language barriers are associated with RR outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed all adult hospitalized patients who experienced a RR over one year (January 2020 to December 2020) at a tertiary care academic medical center. We used an objective scoring system to establish disease severity at the time of the event. We then compared disease severity and outcomes for patients who are primary language Spanish (PLS) and primary language English (PLE) using both univariable and multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1133 patients, 42 identified as PLS and 1091 as PLE. In multivariable analyses, PLS patients had significantly higher disease severity scores, as measured by deterioration index score (8.2, p = 0.021) at the time of their rapid responses. PLS patients also had 18.5% increase in length of stay (LOS) after RRs and this disparity was not mitigated when controlling for disease severity at the time of RRs. PLS was not a significant predictor for hospital mortality after RRs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that PLS patients had increased disease severity at the time of RRs and increased LOS after RRs. However, the disparity in LOS was not mitigated when controlling for disease severity at the time of RRs. These findings suggest that language barriers may cause both delays in activation of RR systems, as well as the care provided during and after RRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2022.2150416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Rapid response (RR) systems are associated with decreased hospital mortality. Systemic biases and inequities can negatively impact RR outcomes. Language barriers between patients and providers are associated with worse outcomes, but it is unknown if language barriers are associated with RR outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed all adult hospitalized patients who experienced a RR over one year (January 2020 to December 2020) at a tertiary care academic medical center. We used an objective scoring system to establish disease severity at the time of the event. We then compared disease severity and outcomes for patients who are primary language Spanish (PLS) and primary language English (PLE) using both univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results: Of 1133 patients, 42 identified as PLS and 1091 as PLE. In multivariable analyses, PLS patients had significantly higher disease severity scores, as measured by deterioration index score (8.2, p = 0.021) at the time of their rapid responses. PLS patients also had 18.5% increase in length of stay (LOS) after RRs and this disparity was not mitigated when controlling for disease severity at the time of RRs. PLS was not a significant predictor for hospital mortality after RRs.

Conclusions: Our study found that PLS patients had increased disease severity at the time of RRs and increased LOS after RRs. However, the disparity in LOS was not mitigated when controlling for disease severity at the time of RRs. These findings suggest that language barriers may cause both delays in activation of RR systems, as well as the care provided during and after RRs.

语言障碍对快速反应小组效能的影响。
目的:快速反应(RR)系统与降低医院死亡率相关。系统性偏见和不公平会对RR结果产生负面影响。患者和医护人员之间的语言障碍与较差的结果相关,但语言障碍是否与RR结果相关尚不清楚。方法:我们分析了一年内(2020年1月至2020年12月)在三级医疗学术中心经历RR的所有成年住院患者。我们使用客观评分系统来确定事件发生时的疾病严重程度。然后,我们使用单变量和多变量分析比较了主要语言为西班牙语(PLS)和主要语言为英语(PLE)的患者的疾病严重程度和结局。结果:1133例患者中,42例为PLS, 1091例为PLE。在多变量分析中,PLS患者在快速反应时,通过恶化指数评分(8.2,p = 0.021)来衡量,疾病严重程度评分明显较高。PLS患者在rrrs后的住院时间(LOS)也增加了18.5%,在rrrs时控制疾病严重程度时,这一差异并未得到缓解。PLS不是rrrs后住院死亡率的显著预测因子。结论:我们的研究发现,PLS患者在rrrs时疾病严重程度增加,rrrs后LOS增加。然而,当控制rr发生时的疾病严重程度时,LOS的差异并没有得到缓解。这些发现表明,语言障碍可能会导致RR系统激活的延迟,以及RR期间和之后提供的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信