Is Virtual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy the Future for People with Dementia? An Audit of UK NHS Memory Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Emily Fisher, Danielle Proctor, Luke Perkins, Cerne Felstead, Joshua Stott, Aimee Spector
{"title":"Is Virtual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy the Future for People with Dementia? An Audit of UK NHS Memory Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Emily Fisher, Danielle Proctor, Luke Perkins, Cerne Felstead, Joshua Stott, Aimee Spector","doi":"10.1007/s41347-023-00306-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to psychosocial interventions for people with dementia, such as Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST), has been restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some services have shifted to provision via videoconferencing, but the prevalence of this is unknown. This audit aimed to understand provision of virtual CST (vCST) within National Health Service (NHS) memory clinics throughout the UK and Channel Islands and investigate plans for ongoing CST provision. A cross-sectional survey was circulated to NHS memory clinics, which included closed and open-ended questions to generate quantitative and qualitative data. Thirty-three memory clinics responded to the survey. During the pandemic, 55% of respondents offered vCST, whereas 45% offered no CST. Of those offering vCST, 80% plan to continue with a hybrid model of separate face-to-face and vCST groups, whilst 20% intend to deliver face-to-face CST only. Reported positive aspects of vCST were participant and staff enjoyment, perceived improved digital confidence in participants, and improved accessibility for those who cannot attend face-to-face groups. Negative aspects related to digital poverty, limited digital literacy, support needed from carers, the impact of sensory impairment on engagement, and staff time commitment. Virtual CST has been a feasible alternative to face-to-face services during the pandemic but should not completely replace in-person groups. A hybrid approach would increase accessibility for all. Future research should explore efficacy of vCST and seek to understand patterns of exclusion from such digital interventions.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41347-023-00306-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":73962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technology in behavioral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technology in behavioral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-023-00306-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to psychosocial interventions for people with dementia, such as Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST), has been restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some services have shifted to provision via videoconferencing, but the prevalence of this is unknown. This audit aimed to understand provision of virtual CST (vCST) within National Health Service (NHS) memory clinics throughout the UK and Channel Islands and investigate plans for ongoing CST provision. A cross-sectional survey was circulated to NHS memory clinics, which included closed and open-ended questions to generate quantitative and qualitative data. Thirty-three memory clinics responded to the survey. During the pandemic, 55% of respondents offered vCST, whereas 45% offered no CST. Of those offering vCST, 80% plan to continue with a hybrid model of separate face-to-face and vCST groups, whilst 20% intend to deliver face-to-face CST only. Reported positive aspects of vCST were participant and staff enjoyment, perceived improved digital confidence in participants, and improved accessibility for those who cannot attend face-to-face groups. Negative aspects related to digital poverty, limited digital literacy, support needed from carers, the impact of sensory impairment on engagement, and staff time commitment. Virtual CST has been a feasible alternative to face-to-face services during the pandemic but should not completely replace in-person groups. A hybrid approach would increase accessibility for all. Future research should explore efficacy of vCST and seek to understand patterns of exclusion from such digital interventions.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41347-023-00306-5.

虚拟认知刺激疗法是痴呆症患者的未来吗?在 COVID-19 大流行期间对英国国家医疗服务体系记忆诊所的审计。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,痴呆症患者接受认知刺激疗法 (CST) 等社会心理干预的机会受到了限制。一些服务机构已转向通过视频会议提供服务,但其普及程度尚不清楚。本次审核旨在了解英国和海峡群岛国家医疗服务系统(NHS)记忆诊所提供虚拟 CST(vCST)的情况,并调查持续提供 CST 的计划。我们向 NHS 记忆诊所分发了一份横向调查表,其中包括封闭式和开放式问题,以生成定量和定性数据。33 家记忆诊所对调查做出了回应。在大流行期间,55% 的受访者提供了 vCST,而 45% 的受访者没有提供 CST。在提供 vCST 的受访者中,80% 的人计划继续采用面对面和 vCST 小组分开的混合模式,而 20% 的人只打算提供面对面的 CST。据报告,虚拟社区支持的积极方面是参与者和工作人员都乐在其中,参与者的数字信心明显提高,无法参加面对面小组的人也更容易获得服务。消极方面涉及数字贫困、有限的数字素养、需要照顾者的支持、感官障碍对参与的影响以及工作人员的时间投入。在大流行病期间,虚拟 CST 是面对面服务的可行替代方案,但不应完全取代面对面小组。混合方法将提高所有人的可及性。未来的研究应探索虚拟 CST 的有效性,并设法了解此类数字干预措施的排斥模式:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s41347-023-00306-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信