Daniele Piscitelli, Melanie C Baniña, Timothy K Lam, Joyce L Chen, Mindy F Levin
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of a New Measure of Upper Limb Performance in Post-Stroke Individuals: Trunk-Based Index of Performance.","authors":"Daniele Piscitelli, Melanie C Baniña, Timothy K Lam, Joyce L Chen, Mindy F Levin","doi":"10.1177/15459683221143462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several measures of upper limb (UL) motor tasks have been developed to characterize recovery. However, UL performance and movement quality measures in isolation may not provide a true profile of functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the measurement properties of a new trunk-based Index of Performance (IPt) of the UL combining endpoint performance (accuracy and speed) and movement quality (trunk displacement) in stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with stroke (n = 25, mean time since stroke: 18.7 ± 17.2 months) performed a reaching task over 3 evaluation sessions. The IPt was computed based on Fitts' Law that incorporated endpoint accuracy and speed corrected by the amount of trunk displacement. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) were determined. Validity was investigated through the relationship between IPt, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), as well as the ability of IPt to distinguish between levels of UL motor impairment severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = .908, 95% CI: 0.807-0.96). Bland-Altman did not show systematic differences. SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> were 14% and 39%, respectively. Construct validity was satisfactory. The IPt showed low-to-moderate relationships with FMA-UE (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ranged from .236 to .428) and ARAT (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ranged from .277 to .306). IPt scores distinguished between different levels of UL severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IPt showed evidence of good reliability, and initial validity. The IPt may be a promising tool for research and clinical settings. Further research is warranted to investigate its validity with additional comparator instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"37 1","pages":"66-75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221143462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Several measures of upper limb (UL) motor tasks have been developed to characterize recovery. However, UL performance and movement quality measures in isolation may not provide a true profile of functional recovery.
Objective: To investigate the measurement properties of a new trunk-based Index of Performance (IPt) of the UL combining endpoint performance (accuracy and speed) and movement quality (trunk displacement) in stroke.
Methods: Participants with stroke (n = 25, mean time since stroke: 18.7 ± 17.2 months) performed a reaching task over 3 evaluation sessions. The IPt was computed based on Fitts' Law that incorporated endpoint accuracy and speed corrected by the amount of trunk displacement. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) were determined. Validity was investigated through the relationship between IPt, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), as well as the ability of IPt to distinguish between levels of UL motor impairment severity.
Results: Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = .908, 95% CI: 0.807-0.96). Bland-Altman did not show systematic differences. SEM and MDC95 were 14% and 39%, respectively. Construct validity was satisfactory. The IPt showed low-to-moderate relationships with FMA-UE (R2 ranged from .236 to .428) and ARAT (R2 ranged from .277 to .306). IPt scores distinguished between different levels of UL severity.
Conclusions: The IPt showed evidence of good reliability, and initial validity. The IPt may be a promising tool for research and clinical settings. Further research is warranted to investigate its validity with additional comparator instruments.
期刊介绍：
Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
