Influence of a Sacroiliac Belt on Pain and Functional Impairment in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial

John S. Ward DC, MA, MS
{"title":"Influence of a Sacroiliac Belt on Pain and Functional Impairment in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial","authors":"John S. Ward DC, MA, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the protective influence of the Serola Sacroiliac Belt on pain and functional impairment in individuals with low back pain (LBP) during 5 days of strenuous manual labor.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-three participants (mean ± standard deviation: age, 43.2 ± 11.4 years; height, 1.74 ± 0.11 m; body mass index<span><span>, 88.3 ± 16.7 kg) with LBP were randomized to either condition A (wearing the Serola Sacroiliac Belt during a 10-minute daily repeated strenuous lifting task) during week 1 or condition B (not wearing a Serola Sacroiliac Belt during the same lifting task) in week 2 or vice versa. All 33 participants completed 1 week under condition A and 1 week under condition B for comparison. At the beginning and end of each week, the following dependent variables were measured: lumbar spine<span> pain on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), spine and thigh discomfort on a Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, and completion of a toe-touch </span></span>surface electromyography flexion relaxation phenomenon test.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the week that participants used the Serola Sacroiliac Belt, spine pain increased 0.2 compared with 0.9 on the NRS for those who did not use the belt. No statistically significant difference was observed for Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire data or the flexion relaxation phenomenon test in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings of this preliminary study suggest participants using the Serola Sacroiliac Belt while performing a daily repeated lifting task had less progression of their LBP. However, this protective value did not meet the recommended NRS for minimally clinically important difference, and there was no effect on functional impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722001018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the protective influence of the Serola Sacroiliac Belt on pain and functional impairment in individuals with low back pain (LBP) during 5 days of strenuous manual labor.

Methods

Thirty-three participants (mean ± standard deviation: age, 43.2 ± 11.4 years; height, 1.74 ± 0.11 m; body mass index, 88.3 ± 16.7 kg) with LBP were randomized to either condition A (wearing the Serola Sacroiliac Belt during a 10-minute daily repeated strenuous lifting task) during week 1 or condition B (not wearing a Serola Sacroiliac Belt during the same lifting task) in week 2 or vice versa. All 33 participants completed 1 week under condition A and 1 week under condition B for comparison. At the beginning and end of each week, the following dependent variables were measured: lumbar spine pain on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), spine and thigh discomfort on a Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, and completion of a toe-touch surface electromyography flexion relaxation phenomenon test.

Results

During the week that participants used the Serola Sacroiliac Belt, spine pain increased 0.2 compared with 0.9 on the NRS for those who did not use the belt. No statistically significant difference was observed for Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire data or the flexion relaxation phenomenon test in this study.

Conclusion

The findings of this preliminary study suggest participants using the Serola Sacroiliac Belt while performing a daily repeated lifting task had less progression of their LBP. However, this protective value did not meet the recommended NRS for minimally clinically important difference, and there was no effect on functional impairment.

骶髂带对腰痛患者疼痛和功能损害的影响:一项随机试验
目的本研究的目的是评估骶髂血清带对腰痛(LBP)患者在5天的剧烈体力劳动中疼痛和功能损害的保护作用。方法33例受试者(平均±标准差:年龄43.2±11.4岁;高度:1.74±0.11 m;体重指数为88.3±16.7 kg)的腰痛患者在第1周随机分为A组(每天10分钟重复剧烈举重任务中佩戴骶髂带),或B组(在相同的举重任务中不佩戴骶髂带),反之亦然。所有33名参与者在条件A和条件B下完成了1周的比较。在每周开始和结束时,测量以下因变量:腰椎疼痛(0 - 10数值评定量表(NRS)),脊柱和大腿不适(北欧肌肉骨骼问卷),完成脚趾接触表面肌电图屈曲松弛现象测试。结果在使用骶髂带的一周内,受试者的脊柱疼痛增加了0.2,而未使用骶髂带的受试者的NRS疼痛增加了0.9。北欧肌肉骨骼问卷数据和屈曲松弛现象测试在本研究中无统计学差异。结论:本初步研究的结果表明,在进行每日重复举重任务时使用骶髂带的参与者的腰痛进展较少。然而,这一保护价值没有达到推荐的NRS的最低临床重要差异,并且对功能损害没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信