Evaluation of critically ill obstetric patients treated in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kadir Arslan, Hale Çetin Arslan, Ayca Sultan Şahin
{"title":"Evaluation of critically ill obstetric patients treated in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Kadir Arslan,&nbsp;Hale Çetin Arslan,&nbsp;Ayca Sultan Şahin","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although obstetric morbidity and mortality have decreased recently, rates are still high enough to constitute a significant health problem. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many obstetric patients have required treatment in intensive care units (ICU).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate critical obstetric patients who were treated in an ICU for COVID-19 and followed up for 90 days.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Medical record review SETTING: Intensıve care unit PATİENTS AND METHODS: Obstetric patients admitted to the ICU between 15 March 2020 and 15 March 2022 and followed up for at least 90 days were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with and without COVID-19 were compared by gestational week, indications, comorbidities, length of stay in the hospital and ICU, requirement for mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion, renal replacement therapy (RRT), plasmapheresis, ICU scores, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Clinical outcomes and mortality.</p><p><strong>Sample size and characteristics: </strong>102 patients with a mean (SD) maternal age of 29.1 (6.3) years, and median (IQR) length of gestation of 35.0 (7.8) weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 30% (n=31) of the patients were positive for COVID-19. Most (87.2%) were cesarean deliveries; 4.9% vaginal (8.7% did not deliver). COVID-19, eclampsia/preeclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage were the most common ICU indications. While the 28-day mortality was 19.3% (n=6) in the COVID-19 group, it was 1.4% (n=1) in the non-COVID-19 group (<i>P</i><.001). The gestational period was significantly shorter in the COVID-19 group (<i>P</i>=.01) while the duration of stay in ICU (<i>P</i><.001) and mechanical ventilation (<i>P</i>=.03), lactate (<i>P</i>=.002), blood transfusions (<i>P</i>=.001), plasmapheresis requirements (<i>P</i>=.02), and 28-day mortality were significantly higher (<i>P</i><.001). APACHE-2 scores (<i>P</i>=.007), duration of stay in ICU (<i>P</i><.001) and mechanical ventilation (<i>P</i><.001), RRT (<i>P</i>=.007), and plasmapheresis requirements (<i>P</i>=.005) were significantly higher in patients who died than in those who were discharged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most common indication for ICU admission was COVID-19. The APACHE-2 scoring was helpful in predicting mortality. We think multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed for COVID-19 obstetric patients. In addition to greater mortality and morbidity, the infection may affect newborn outcomes by causing premature birth.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospectıve, single-center, small population size.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c2/98/0256-4947.2023.10.PMC9899340.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Although obstetric morbidity and mortality have decreased recently, rates are still high enough to constitute a significant health problem. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many obstetric patients have required treatment in intensive care units (ICU).

Objectives: Evaluate critical obstetric patients who were treated in an ICU for COVID-19 and followed up for 90 days.

Design: Medical record review SETTING: Intensıve care unit PATİENTS AND METHODS: Obstetric patients admitted to the ICU between 15 March 2020 and 15 March 2022 and followed up for at least 90 days were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with and without COVID-19 were compared by gestational week, indications, comorbidities, length of stay in the hospital and ICU, requirement for mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion, renal replacement therapy (RRT), plasmapheresis, ICU scores, and mortality.

Main outcome measures: Clinical outcomes and mortality.

Sample size and characteristics: 102 patients with a mean (SD) maternal age of 29.1 (6.3) years, and median (IQR) length of gestation of 35.0 (7.8) weeks.

Results: About 30% (n=31) of the patients were positive for COVID-19. Most (87.2%) were cesarean deliveries; 4.9% vaginal (8.7% did not deliver). COVID-19, eclampsia/preeclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage were the most common ICU indications. While the 28-day mortality was 19.3% (n=6) in the COVID-19 group, it was 1.4% (n=1) in the non-COVID-19 group (P<.001). The gestational period was significantly shorter in the COVID-19 group (P=.01) while the duration of stay in ICU (P<.001) and mechanical ventilation (P=.03), lactate (P=.002), blood transfusions (P=.001), plasmapheresis requirements (P=.02), and 28-day mortality were significantly higher (P<.001). APACHE-2 scores (P=.007), duration of stay in ICU (P<.001) and mechanical ventilation (P<.001), RRT (P=.007), and plasmapheresis requirements (P=.005) were significantly higher in patients who died than in those who were discharged.

Conclusion: The most common indication for ICU admission was COVID-19. The APACHE-2 scoring was helpful in predicting mortality. We think multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed for COVID-19 obstetric patients. In addition to greater mortality and morbidity, the infection may affect newborn outcomes by causing premature birth.

Limitations: Retrospectıve, single-center, small population size.

Conflict of interest: None.

COVID-19大流行期间重症监护病房重症产科患者的评估
背景:虽然产科发病率和死亡率最近有所下降,但比率仍然很高,足以构成一个重大的健康问题。随着COVID-19大流行,许多产科患者需要在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗。目的:对重症监护病房收治的新冠肺炎产科危重患者进行随访90天的评价。设计:病历回顾设置:Intensıve护理单位PATİENTS和方法:回顾性评估2020年3月15日至2022年3月15日期间入住ICU并随访至少90天的产科患者。比较两组患者的妊娠周数、适应证、合并症、住院时间和ICU时间、机械通气需求、输血、肾替代治疗(RRT)、血浆置换、ICU评分和死亡率。主要结局指标:临床结局和死亡率。样本量和特征:102例患者,平均(SD)年龄29.1(6.3)岁,中位(IQR)妊娠长度35.0(7.8)周。结果:约30% (n=31)患者新冠肺炎阳性。大多数(87.2%)为剖宫产;4.9%阴道分娩(8.7%未分娩)。COVID-19、子痫/先兆子痫和产后出血是ICU最常见的适应症。COVID-19组28天死亡率为19.3% (n=6),非COVID-19组28天死亡率为1.4% (n=1) (PP= 0.01),而死亡患者的ICU住院时间(PP= 0.03)、乳酸(P= 0.002)、输血(P= 0.001)、血浆置换要求(P= 0.02)、28天死亡率(PP= 0.007)、ICU住院时间(PPP= 0.007)、血浆置换要求(P= 0.005)均显著高于出院患者。结论:COVID-19是ICU住院最常见的指征。APACHE-2评分有助于预测死亡率。我们认为需要对COVID-19产科患者进行更大样本量的多中心研究。除了更高的死亡率和发病率外,这种感染还可能通过引起早产来影响新生儿结局。局限性:Retrospectıve,单中心,人口规模小。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Annals of Saudi Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信