'Mind-forg'd Manacles': Virtual Experience and Innocent Publication.

Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s11196-023-09971-4
Francine Rochford
{"title":"'Mind-forg'd Manacles': Virtual Experience and Innocent Publication.","authors":"Francine Rochford","doi":"10.1007/s11196-023-09971-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In <i>Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller</i> ('<i>Voller</i>') the Australian High Court held that media companies maintaining Facebook comment pages could be liable for the defamatory posts of commenters on those sites. The decision focussed entirely on whether, by maintaining the Facebook page, the companies had 'published' the statements of commenters. Hearings on other aspects of the tort litigation continue. This paper considers the implications of the tort of defamation on public participation on political will formation where, as is increasingly the case, the participation occurs virtually. Australian law has already tackled the law of defamation as a threat to freedom of political communication; <i>Voller</i> continues the jurisprudence by considering whether hosting an online forum for debate amounts to publication. The more recent High Court judgment in <i>Google LLC v Defteros</i> demonstrated the necessity of the law to align the 'acts' necessary to found legal action with the new environment of automated search engines. The troubled intersection of dematerialised practices of political and cultural discourse and jurisdictionally bound laws of defamation challenges participatory governance as tribes form and dissolve and shift between geographical interests. Defamation in Australia is a tort of strict liability; and, absenting applicable defences, any participation in communication is sufficient to make that participant a publisher and a party to the defamation. The online environment stretches words across geographical and jurisdictional boundaries, but it also stretches and contorts concepts of fault and responsibility. Participatory digital cultural practices integrating users in the creation of cultural heritage simultaneously draw participants into transgressions, both cultural and legal, which are amplified by the medium. Questions of collective guilt, 'shades' of moral responsibility and disproportionality between blameworthiness and legal liability challenge laws formulated for the printing press but now deployed in the online environment. In this way the digitized participatory environment presents deep challenges to law and legal systems, which are chained to geography. This paper considers the concept of innocent publication in the context of the digitized participatory environment and the way in which the virtual experience is dissolving concepts of geographically defined jurisdictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09971-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller ('Voller') the Australian High Court held that media companies maintaining Facebook comment pages could be liable for the defamatory posts of commenters on those sites. The decision focussed entirely on whether, by maintaining the Facebook page, the companies had 'published' the statements of commenters. Hearings on other aspects of the tort litigation continue. This paper considers the implications of the tort of defamation on public participation on political will formation where, as is increasingly the case, the participation occurs virtually. Australian law has already tackled the law of defamation as a threat to freedom of political communication; Voller continues the jurisprudence by considering whether hosting an online forum for debate amounts to publication. The more recent High Court judgment in Google LLC v Defteros demonstrated the necessity of the law to align the 'acts' necessary to found legal action with the new environment of automated search engines. The troubled intersection of dematerialised practices of political and cultural discourse and jurisdictionally bound laws of defamation challenges participatory governance as tribes form and dissolve and shift between geographical interests. Defamation in Australia is a tort of strict liability; and, absenting applicable defences, any participation in communication is sufficient to make that participant a publisher and a party to the defamation. The online environment stretches words across geographical and jurisdictional boundaries, but it also stretches and contorts concepts of fault and responsibility. Participatory digital cultural practices integrating users in the creation of cultural heritage simultaneously draw participants into transgressions, both cultural and legal, which are amplified by the medium. Questions of collective guilt, 'shades' of moral responsibility and disproportionality between blameworthiness and legal liability challenge laws formulated for the printing press but now deployed in the online environment. In this way the digitized participatory environment presents deep challenges to law and legal systems, which are chained to geography. This paper considers the concept of innocent publication in the context of the digitized participatory environment and the way in which the virtual experience is dissolving concepts of geographically defined jurisdictions.

分享
查看原文
精神枷锁》:虚拟体验与无辜出版
在 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd 诉 Voller("Voller")一案中,澳大利亚高等法院认为,维护 Facebook 评论页面的媒体公司可能要对评论者在这些网站上发表的诽谤性文章承担责任。该判决的重点完全在于,通过维护 Facebook 页面,这些公司是否 "发布 "了评论者的言论。侵权诉讼其他方面的听证会仍在继续。本文探讨了诽谤侵权行为对公众参与政治意愿形成的影响,在这种情况下,公众的参与越来越多地通过虚拟方式进行。澳大利亚法律已将诽谤法视为对政治交流自由的威胁;沃勒案延续了这一判例,考虑了主办在线辩论论坛是否构成出版的问题。最近高等法院对谷歌有限责任公司诉 Defteros 案的判决表明,法律有必要根据自动搜索引擎的新环境调整法律诉讼所需的 "行为"。政治和文化话语的非物质化实践与受司法管辖的诽谤法之间的交集令人不安,这对参与式治理提出了挑战,因为部落会形成、解散并在地域利益之间转移。在澳大利亚,诽谤是一种严格责任侵权行为;如果没有适用的辩护理由,任何参与交流的行为都足以使参与者成为诽谤的发布者和当事人。网络环境使文字跨越了地理和司法的界限,但同时也延伸和扭曲了过错和责任的概念。参与式数字文化实践将用户融入文化遗产的创造中,同时也将参与者卷入文化和法律的越轨行为中,而这种越轨行为又被媒介所放大。集体罪责、道德责任的 "深浅 "以及有责性与法律责任之间的不相称等问题,都是对为印刷机制定、但现在却应用于网络环境的法律的挑战。因此,数字化的参与性环境对法律和法律制度提出了深刻的挑战,而法律和法律制度是与地理环境相联系的。本文探讨了数字化参与环境下的无辜出版概念,以及虚拟体验如何消解地理上界定的司法管辖概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信