Feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity behavioural modification tele-coaching intervention in lung transplant recipients.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Emily Hume, Hazel Muse, Kirstie Wallace, Mick Wilkinson, Karen Heslop Marshall, Arun Nair, Stephen Clark, Ioannis Vogiatzis
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity behavioural modification tele-coaching intervention in lung transplant recipients.","authors":"Emily Hume,&nbsp;Hazel Muse,&nbsp;Kirstie Wallace,&nbsp;Mick Wilkinson,&nbsp;Karen Heslop Marshall,&nbsp;Arun Nair,&nbsp;Stephen Clark,&nbsp;Ioannis Vogiatzis","doi":"10.1177/14799731221116588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite improvements in pulmonary function following lung transplantation (LTx), physical activity levels remain significantly lower than the general population. To date, there is little research investigating interventions to improve daily physical activity in LTx recipients. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, 12-weeks physical activity tele-coaching (TC) intervention in LTx recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung transplant recipients within 2 months of hospital discharge were recruited and randomised (1:1) to TC or usual care (UC). TC consists of a pedometer and smartphone app, allowing transmission of activity data to a platform that provides feedback, activity goals, education, and contact with the researcher as required. Recruitment and retention, occurrence of adverse events, intervention acceptability and usage were used to assess feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key criteria for progressing to a larger study were met. Of the 15 patients eligible, 14 were recruited and randomised to TC or UC and 12 completed (67% male; mean ± SD age; 58 ± 7 years; COPD <i>n</i> = 4, ILD <i>n</i> = 6, CF <i>n</i> = 1, PH <i>n</i> = 1): TC (<i>n</i> = 7) and UC (<i>n</i> = 5). TC was well accepted by patients, with 86% indicating that they enjoyed taking part. Usage of the pedometer was excellent, with all patients wearing it for over 90% of days and rating the pedometer and telephone contact as the most vital aspects. There were no adverse events related to the intervention. After 12 weeks, only TC displayed improvements in accelerometry steps/day (by 3475 ± 3422; <i>p</i> = .036) and movement intensity (by 153 ± 166 VMU; <i>p</i> = .019), whereas both TC and UC groups exhibited clinically important changes in physical SF-36 scores (by 11 ± 14 and 7 ± 9 points, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TC appears to be a feasible, safe, and well-accepted intervention in LTx.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"14799731221116588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619269/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731221116588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Despite improvements in pulmonary function following lung transplantation (LTx), physical activity levels remain significantly lower than the general population. To date, there is little research investigating interventions to improve daily physical activity in LTx recipients. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, 12-weeks physical activity tele-coaching (TC) intervention in LTx recipients.

Methods: Lung transplant recipients within 2 months of hospital discharge were recruited and randomised (1:1) to TC or usual care (UC). TC consists of a pedometer and smartphone app, allowing transmission of activity data to a platform that provides feedback, activity goals, education, and contact with the researcher as required. Recruitment and retention, occurrence of adverse events, intervention acceptability and usage were used to assess feasibility.

Results: Key criteria for progressing to a larger study were met. Of the 15 patients eligible, 14 were recruited and randomised to TC or UC and 12 completed (67% male; mean ± SD age; 58 ± 7 years; COPD n = 4, ILD n = 6, CF n = 1, PH n = 1): TC (n = 7) and UC (n = 5). TC was well accepted by patients, with 86% indicating that they enjoyed taking part. Usage of the pedometer was excellent, with all patients wearing it for over 90% of days and rating the pedometer and telephone contact as the most vital aspects. There were no adverse events related to the intervention. After 12 weeks, only TC displayed improvements in accelerometry steps/day (by 3475 ± 3422; p = .036) and movement intensity (by 153 ± 166 VMU; p = .019), whereas both TC and UC groups exhibited clinically important changes in physical SF-36 scores (by 11 ± 14 and 7 ± 9 points, respectively).

Conclusion: TC appears to be a feasible, safe, and well-accepted intervention in LTx.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肺移植受者身体活动行为矫正远程指导干预的可行性和可接受性。
背景:尽管肺移植(LTx)后肺功能有所改善,但体力活动水平仍明显低于普通人群。迄今为止,很少有研究调查干预措施,以改善LTx接受者的日常身体活动。本研究评估了一种新颖的、为期12周的远程体育活动指导(TC)干预LTx接受者的可行性和可接受性。方法:招募出院2个月内的肺移植受者,按1:1的比例随机分为TC组或常规护理组(UC)。TC由计步器和智能手机应用程序组成,可以将活动数据传输到平台,平台可以根据需要提供反馈、活动目标、教育和与研究人员的联系。采用招募和保留、不良事件的发生、干预措施的可接受性和使用情况来评估可行性。结果:符合进行更大规模研究的关键标准。在符合条件的15例患者中,14例被招募并随机分配到TC或UC, 12例完成(67%男性;平均±SD年龄;58±7岁;COPD n = 4, ILD n = 6, CF n = 1, PH n = 1): TC (n = 7)和UC (n = 5)。TC被患者很好地接受,86%的患者表示喜欢参加。计步器的使用情况非常好,所有患者都戴着它超过90%的天,并将计步器和电话联系评为最重要的方面。没有与干预相关的不良事件。12周后,只有TC显示加速度计步数/天的改善(增加3475±3422;p = 0.036)和运动强度(153±166 VMU;p = 0.019),而TC组和UC组在SF-36物理评分方面均表现出临床重要的变化(分别为11±14分和7±9分)。结论:TC似乎是一种可行、安全且被广泛接受的LTx干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信