Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Kelly Lyons, Niti Dham, Bryanna Schwartz, Blachy J Dávila Saldaña
{"title":"Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.","authors":"Kelly Lyons,&nbsp;Niti Dham,&nbsp;Bryanna Schwartz,&nbsp;Blachy J Dávila Saldaña","doi":"10.1155/2023/7455756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pericardial effusions are a known complication posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), causing significant morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the development of high-grade effusions requiring interventions. <i>Procedure</i>. A retrospective chart review of all HSCT patients over a period of 7 years (2013-2019) in a single institution in the Northeastern United States is conducted. All patients who developed an effusion requiring intervention were included. Patient's clinical characteristics were compared with all others transplanted during the same time period. Echocardiogram findings of the affected patients were compared to a case-control cohort of unaffected patients with similar age and diagnosis. Chi-square and paired <i>t</i>-tests were utilized to ascertain statistical differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 patients out of 201 (7.5%) transplanted at our institution developed a moderate or large pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis or a pericardial window. Of this cohort, 13 (87%) underwent a myeloablative preparative regimen, 13 (87%) had cyclophosphamide as part of their regimen, 13 (87%) had recent treatment for viral reactivation, 6 (40%) had an underlying hemoglobinopathy diagnosis, and only 4 (27%) had an active diagnosis of GVHD. A myeloablative preparative regimen had a higher rate of effusion requiring intervention, although it was not statistically significant, and concurrent GVHD was not predictive of effusion development. However, exposure to cyclophosphamide, recent treatment for viral reactivation, and a diagnosis of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (Ta-TMA) were highly associated with effusions. The latter was associated with increased mortality. The duration of pericardial effusion correlated with the pretransplant echocardiogram left ventricle end diastolic diameter z-score and apical 4-chamber left ventricular peak average strain measurement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potential risk factors for pericardial effusions post-HSCT include a diagnosis of Ta-TMA, active viral infection, exposure to cyclophosphamide, and a higher left ventricle end diastolic diameter <i>z</i>-score. This information may help guide management for these patients, including identifying high-risk subjects, determining the frequency of echocardiograms, and determining specific echocardiogram measures to follow over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7455756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pericardial effusions are a known complication posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), causing significant morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the development of high-grade effusions requiring interventions. Procedure. A retrospective chart review of all HSCT patients over a period of 7 years (2013-2019) in a single institution in the Northeastern United States is conducted. All patients who developed an effusion requiring intervention were included. Patient's clinical characteristics were compared with all others transplanted during the same time period. Echocardiogram findings of the affected patients were compared to a case-control cohort of unaffected patients with similar age and diagnosis. Chi-square and paired t-tests were utilized to ascertain statistical differences between the groups.

Results: A total of 15 patients out of 201 (7.5%) transplanted at our institution developed a moderate or large pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis or a pericardial window. Of this cohort, 13 (87%) underwent a myeloablative preparative regimen, 13 (87%) had cyclophosphamide as part of their regimen, 13 (87%) had recent treatment for viral reactivation, 6 (40%) had an underlying hemoglobinopathy diagnosis, and only 4 (27%) had an active diagnosis of GVHD. A myeloablative preparative regimen had a higher rate of effusion requiring intervention, although it was not statistically significant, and concurrent GVHD was not predictive of effusion development. However, exposure to cyclophosphamide, recent treatment for viral reactivation, and a diagnosis of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (Ta-TMA) were highly associated with effusions. The latter was associated with increased mortality. The duration of pericardial effusion correlated with the pretransplant echocardiogram left ventricle end diastolic diameter z-score and apical 4-chamber left ventricular peak average strain measurement.

Conclusions: Potential risk factors for pericardial effusions post-HSCT include a diagnosis of Ta-TMA, active viral infection, exposure to cyclophosphamide, and a higher left ventricle end diastolic diameter z-score. This information may help guide management for these patients, including identifying high-risk subjects, determining the frequency of echocardiograms, and determining specific echocardiogram measures to follow over time.

造血干细胞移植后症状性心包积液的危险因素。
背景:心包积液是造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后常见的并发症,发病率高。我们的目的是评估与需要干预的高级别积液发展相关的危险因素。过程。对美国东北部一家机构7年(2013-2019年)的所有HSCT患者进行回顾性图表回顾。所有发生积液需要干预的患者均纳入研究。将患者的临床特征与同期移植的其他患者进行比较。将受影响患者的超声心动图结果与年龄和诊断相似的未受影响患者的病例对照队列进行比较。使用卡方检验和配对t检验来确定组间的统计学差异。结果:我院201例移植患者中有15例(7.5%)出现中度或重度心包积液,需要心包穿刺或心包开窗术。在该队列中,13例(87%)接受了清髓预备方案,13例(87%)使用环磷酰胺作为其方案的一部分,13例(87%)最近接受了病毒再激活治疗,6例(40%)诊断为潜在的血红蛋白病,只有4例(27%)诊断为GVHD。清骨髓预备方案有更高的积液率需要干预,尽管这没有统计学意义,并发GVHD并不能预测积液的发展。然而,暴露于环磷酰胺、最近的病毒再激活治疗和移植相关血栓性微血管病(Ta-TMA)的诊断与积液高度相关。后者与死亡率增加有关。心包积液持续时间与移植前超声心动图左心室舒张末期内径z-score及4室心尖峰值平均应变测量值相关。结论:hsct后心包积液的潜在危险因素包括Ta-TMA诊断、活动性病毒感染、暴露于环磷酰胺和左心室舒张末期直径较高的z评分。这些信息可能有助于指导这些患者的管理,包括识别高风险受试者,确定超声心动图的频率,并确定随时间推移的具体超声心动图措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信