Phytochemical Comparison of Medicinal Cannabis Extracts and Study of Their CYP-Mediated Interactions with Coumarinic Oral Anticoagulants.

Q1 Medicine
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Pub Date : 2023-02-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000528465
Andrea Treyer, Jakob K Reinhardt, Daniela Elisabeth Eigenmann, Mouhssin Oufir, Matthias Hamburger
{"title":"Phytochemical Comparison of Medicinal Cannabis Extracts and Study of Their CYP-Mediated Interactions with Coumarinic Oral Anticoagulants.","authors":"Andrea Treyer, Jakob K Reinhardt, Daniela Elisabeth Eigenmann, Mouhssin Oufir, Matthias Hamburger","doi":"10.1159/000528465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment with cannabis extracts for a variety of diseases has gained popularity. However, differences in herb-drug interaction potential of extracts from different plant sources are poorly understood. In this study, we provide a characterization of cannabis extracts prepared from four cannabis chemotypes and an in vitro assessment of their Cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated herb-drug interaction profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plant extracts were either commercially obtained or prepared using ethanol as solvent, followed by overnight decarboxylation in a reflux condenser system. The extracts were characterized for their cannabinoid content using NMR and HPLC-PDA-ELSD-ESIMS. CYP inhibition studies with the cannabis extracts and pure cannabinoids (tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] and cannabidiol [CBD]) were performed using pooled, mixed gender human liver microsomes. Tolbutamide and testosterone were used as specific substrates to assess the inhibitory potential of the extracts on CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, and the coumarinic oral anticoagulants warfarin, phenprocoumon, and acenocoumarol were studied as model compounds since in vivo herb-drug interactions have previously been reported for this compound class.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In accordance with the plant chemotypes, two extracts were rich in THC and CBD (at different proportions); one extract contained mostly CBD and the other mostly cannabigerol (CBG). Residual amounts of the corresponding acids were found in all extracts. The extracts with a single major cannabinoid (CBD or CBG) inhibited CYP2C9- and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism stronger than the extracts containing both major cannabinoids (THC and CBD). The inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 by the extract containing mostly CBD was comparable to their inhibition by pure CBD. In contrast, the inhibitory potency of extracts containing both THC and CBD did not correspond to the combined inhibitory potency of pure THC and CBD. Although being structural analogs, the three coumarin derivatives displayed major differences in their herb-drug interaction profiles with the cannabis extracts and the pure cannabinoids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the fact that cannabinoids are the major components in ethanolic, decarboxylated cannabis extracts, it is difficult to foresee their herb-drug interaction profiles. Our in vitro data and the literature-based evidence on in vivo interactions indicate that cannabis extracts should be used cautiously when co-administered with drugs exhibiting a narrow therapeutic window, such as coumarinic anticoagulants, regardless of the cannabis chemotype used for extract preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18415,"journal":{"name":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","volume":"6 1","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment with cannabis extracts for a variety of diseases has gained popularity. However, differences in herb-drug interaction potential of extracts from different plant sources are poorly understood. In this study, we provide a characterization of cannabis extracts prepared from four cannabis chemotypes and an in vitro assessment of their Cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated herb-drug interaction profiles.

Methods: Plant extracts were either commercially obtained or prepared using ethanol as solvent, followed by overnight decarboxylation in a reflux condenser system. The extracts were characterized for their cannabinoid content using NMR and HPLC-PDA-ELSD-ESIMS. CYP inhibition studies with the cannabis extracts and pure cannabinoids (tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] and cannabidiol [CBD]) were performed using pooled, mixed gender human liver microsomes. Tolbutamide and testosterone were used as specific substrates to assess the inhibitory potential of the extracts on CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, and the coumarinic oral anticoagulants warfarin, phenprocoumon, and acenocoumarol were studied as model compounds since in vivo herb-drug interactions have previously been reported for this compound class.

Results: In accordance with the plant chemotypes, two extracts were rich in THC and CBD (at different proportions); one extract contained mostly CBD and the other mostly cannabigerol (CBG). Residual amounts of the corresponding acids were found in all extracts. The extracts with a single major cannabinoid (CBD or CBG) inhibited CYP2C9- and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism stronger than the extracts containing both major cannabinoids (THC and CBD). The inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 by the extract containing mostly CBD was comparable to their inhibition by pure CBD. In contrast, the inhibitory potency of extracts containing both THC and CBD did not correspond to the combined inhibitory potency of pure THC and CBD. Although being structural analogs, the three coumarin derivatives displayed major differences in their herb-drug interaction profiles with the cannabis extracts and the pure cannabinoids.

Conclusion: Despite the fact that cannabinoids are the major components in ethanolic, decarboxylated cannabis extracts, it is difficult to foresee their herb-drug interaction profiles. Our in vitro data and the literature-based evidence on in vivo interactions indicate that cannabis extracts should be used cautiously when co-administered with drugs exhibiting a narrow therapeutic window, such as coumarinic anticoagulants, regardless of the cannabis chemotype used for extract preparation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

药用大麻提取物的植物化学比较及其与香豆素类口服抗凝剂的 CYP 介导相互作用研究。
导言:用大麻提取物治疗各种疾病已越来越受欢迎。然而,人们对不同植物来源的提取物在药草-药物相互作用潜力方面的差异知之甚少。在本研究中,我们对从四种大麻化学型制备的大麻提取物进行了特征描述,并对其细胞色素 P450(CYP)介导的药草-药物相互作用特征进行了体外评估:方法:植物提取物通过商业途径获得,或使用乙醇作为溶剂进行制备,然后在回流冷凝器系统中过夜脱羧。使用核磁共振和 HPLC-PDA-ELSD-ESIMS 对提取物中的大麻素含量进行表征。使用汇集的混合性别人类肝脏微粒体对大麻提取物和纯大麻素(四氢大麻酚 [THC] 和大麻二酚 [CBD])进行了 CYP 抑制研究。托布他胺和睾酮被用作特异性底物,以评估萃取物对 CYP2C9 和 CYP3A4 的抑制潜力,香豆素类口服抗凝剂华法林、苯丙香豆素和苊香豆素被用作模型化合物进行研究,因为以前曾报道过这一类化合物在体内的草药-药物相互作用:根据植物的化学类型,两种提取物富含四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚(比例不同);一种提取物主要含有大麻二酚,另一种提取物主要含有大麻萜醇(CBG)。在所有提取物中都发现了相应酸类的残留量。含有单一主要大麻素(CBD 或 CBG)的提取物对 CYP2C9 和 CYP3A4 介导的代谢的抑制作用强于同时含有两种主要大麻素(四氢大麻酚和 CBD)的提取物。主要含有 CBD 的提取物对 CYP3A4 和 CYP2C9 的抑制作用与纯 CBD 的抑制作用相当。相反,同时含有 THC 和 CBD 的提取物对 CYP3A4 和 CYP2C9 的抑制作用与纯 THC 和 CBD 的综合抑制作用不相上下。虽然是结构类似物,但这三种香豆素衍生物在与大麻提取物和纯大麻素的草药-药物相互作用特征方面存在很大差异:尽管大麻素是乙醇脱羧大麻提取物中的主要成分,但很难预见它们的药草-药物相互作用特征。我们的体外数据和基于文献的体内相互作用证据表明,无论使用哪种大麻化学型制备提取物,当与治疗窗口狭窄的药物(如香豆素类抗凝剂)合用时,都应谨慎使用大麻提取物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信