Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers.

IF 2.8 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-25 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2023.2184262

Guangwei Hu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ChatGPT, a chatbot released by OpenAI in November 2022, has rocked academia with its capacity to generate papers "good enough" for academic journals. Major journals such as Nature and professional societies such as the World Association of Medical Editors have moved fast to issue policies to ban or curb AI-written papers. Amid the flurry of policy initiatives, one important challenge seems to be overlooked: AI-generated papers are not easily discernible to the human eye, and we lack the right tools to implement the policies. Without such tools, the well-intentioned policies are likely to remain on paper.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对人工智能生成的论文执行编辑政策所面临的挑战。

ChatGPT是OpenAI于2022年11月发布的一款聊天机器人，它能为学术期刊撰写 "足够好 "的论文，因此震惊了学术界。自然》等主要期刊和世界医学编辑协会等专业协会已迅速采取行动，出台政策禁止或遏制人工智能撰写论文。在纷繁的政策措施中，一个重要的挑战似乎被忽略了：人工智能生成的论文不容易被人眼识别，而且我们缺乏执行政策的正确工具。没有这样的工具，用意良好的政策很可能只能停留在纸面上。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.