[A comparison of current guidelines for the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma worldwide].

Y X Yu, Z J Wu, W Tang, R Liao
{"title":"[A comparison of current guidelines for the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma worldwide].","authors":"Y X Yu, Z J Wu, W Tang, R Liao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20221125-00495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common human liver malignancy and its incidence rate has been gradually increasing worldwide over the past decades. Surgical resection (R0 resection) is the preferred potentially curative treatment for ICC patients. However, due to its conceal clinical features and high invasiveness, most patients have lost the opportunity for surgical resection at the time of diagnosis. In recent years, with the rapid development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which is represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors, clinicians are expected to provide more effective treatment options for patients with mid-stage or advanced ICC. At present, there are still controversial opinions on different guidelines regarding preoperative biliary drainage, the extent of hepatectomy, the definition of R0 resection, the width of the resection margin, lymph node dissection, postoperative recurrence, adjuvant therapy, etc. In this review, 12 guidelines or expert consensus published worldwide from 2012 to 2022 (including 4 Chinese guidelines, 4 European guidelines, 2 American guidelines and 2 Japanese guidelines) were retrieved. Focusing on sorting and comparing the current views on clinical management of ICC in different guidelines, this review aims to provide reference information for ICC clinical management and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23966,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","volume":"61 4","pages":"297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20221125-00495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common human liver malignancy and its incidence rate has been gradually increasing worldwide over the past decades. Surgical resection (R0 resection) is the preferred potentially curative treatment for ICC patients. However, due to its conceal clinical features and high invasiveness, most patients have lost the opportunity for surgical resection at the time of diagnosis. In recent years, with the rapid development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which is represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors, clinicians are expected to provide more effective treatment options for patients with mid-stage or advanced ICC. At present, there are still controversial opinions on different guidelines regarding preoperative biliary drainage, the extent of hepatectomy, the definition of R0 resection, the width of the resection margin, lymph node dissection, postoperative recurrence, adjuvant therapy, etc. In this review, 12 guidelines or expert consensus published worldwide from 2012 to 2022 (including 4 Chinese guidelines, 4 European guidelines, 2 American guidelines and 2 Japanese guidelines) were retrieved. Focusing on sorting and comparing the current views on clinical management of ICC in different guidelines, this review aims to provide reference information for ICC clinical management and decision-making.

[全球肝内胆管癌管理现行指南比较]。
肝内胆管癌(ICC)是人类第二大肝脏恶性肿瘤,过去几十年来,其发病率在全球范围内逐渐上升。手术切除(R0切除)是ICC患者首选的可能治愈的治疗方法。然而,由于其临床特征隐匿且具有高侵袭性,大多数患者在确诊时就失去了手术切除的机会。近年来,随着以免疫检查点抑制剂为代表的靶向治疗和免疫治疗的快速发展,临床医生有望为中晚期ICC患者提供更有效的治疗方案。目前,关于术前胆道引流、肝切除范围、R0切除定义、切除边缘宽度、淋巴结清扫、术后复发、辅助治疗等问题,不同指南仍存在争议。本综述检索了2012年至2022年全球发布的12份指南或专家共识(包括4份中国指南、4份欧洲指南、2份美国指南和2份日本指南)。本综述侧重于梳理和比较目前不同指南中关于ICC临床管理的观点,旨在为ICC临床管理和决策提供参考信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信