Floating door sign does not differentiate Parkinson’s disease from essential tremor

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Valtteri Räty , Mikael Eklund , Simo Nuuttila , Elina Jaakkola , Elina Mäkinen , Kirsi Murtomäki , Tanja Nojonen , Reeta Levo , Tuomas Mertsalmi , Juho Joutsa , Filip Scheperjans , Valtteri Kaasinen
{"title":"Floating door sign does not differentiate Parkinson’s disease from essential tremor","authors":"Valtteri Räty ,&nbsp;Mikael Eklund ,&nbsp;Simo Nuuttila ,&nbsp;Elina Jaakkola ,&nbsp;Elina Mäkinen ,&nbsp;Kirsi Murtomäki ,&nbsp;Tanja Nojonen ,&nbsp;Reeta Levo ,&nbsp;Tuomas Mertsalmi ,&nbsp;Juho Joutsa ,&nbsp;Filip Scheperjans ,&nbsp;Valtteri Kaasinen","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diagnostic usefulness of the floating door sign was tested in 144 PD patients, 41 essential tremor patients and 38 controls. There were no differences in the presence of floating door sign between PD and ET patients. The sign does not seem to be a reliable differential diagnostic tool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/01/main.PMC9932557.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112523000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic usefulness of the floating door sign was tested in 144 PD patients, 41 essential tremor patients and 38 controls. There were no differences in the presence of floating door sign between PD and ET patients. The sign does not seem to be a reliable differential diagnostic tool.

浮动门牌不能区分帕金森氏症和特发性震颤
在144名帕金森病患者、41名原发性震颤患者和38名对照组中测试了浮门标志的诊断有用性。PD和ET患者在浮门征的存在方面没有差异。这个信号似乎不是一个可靠的鉴别诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信