A New Look at Barriers to Clinical Care Among Appalachian Residents Living With Diabetes.

Q3 Medicine
Brittany L Smalls, Mary E Lacy, Adebola Adegboyega, Laura Hieronymus, Nicole Bacha, Tayla Nathoo, Philip M Westgate, Tofial Azam, Susan Westneat, Nancy E Schoenberg
{"title":"A New Look at Barriers to Clinical Care Among Appalachian Residents Living With Diabetes.","authors":"Brittany L Smalls,&nbsp;Mary E Lacy,&nbsp;Adebola Adegboyega,&nbsp;Laura Hieronymus,&nbsp;Nicole Bacha,&nbsp;Tayla Nathoo,&nbsp;Philip M Westgate,&nbsp;Tofial Azam,&nbsp;Susan Westneat,&nbsp;Nancy E Schoenberg","doi":"10.2337/ds22-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death and continues to rise in prevalence, with type 2 diabetes accounting for 90-95% of all cases. Rates of diabetes in Kentucky, and, in particular, the Appalachian region, are among the highest in the nation and are increasing faster than the national average. Despite this disproportionate burden, barriers to clinical appointment attendance have not been fully explored in this population. This article examines the association among perceived barriers to clinical attendance, glycemic control, and diabetes self-care as part of an ongoing study. We used a 25-item checklist developed using the Chronic Care Model to assess participants' barriers to clinic attendance. Glycemic control was assessed via A1C measurement. Diabetes self-care was assessed using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure. At the time of analysis, 123 of the 356 participants (34.6%) did not report any barriers to clinic attendance. For the remainder, the major reported barriers included forgetting appointments, inability to afford medicines or other treatment, and placing faith above medical care. The average A1C was 7.7%, and the average diabetes self-care summary score was 17.1 out of 35 points (with higher values indicating better self-care). Missing clinic appointments is associated with lower health outcomes, especially in vulnerable populations. This study can help educate clinic staff on perceived barriers to type 2 diabetes management among people with diabetes in Appalachia.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death and continues to rise in prevalence, with type 2 diabetes accounting for 90-95% of all cases. Rates of diabetes in Kentucky, and, in particular, the Appalachian region, are among the highest in the nation and are increasing faster than the national average. Despite this disproportionate burden, barriers to clinical appointment attendance have not been fully explored in this population. This article examines the association among perceived barriers to clinical attendance, glycemic control, and diabetes self-care as part of an ongoing study. We used a 25-item checklist developed using the Chronic Care Model to assess participants' barriers to clinic attendance. Glycemic control was assessed via A1C measurement. Diabetes self-care was assessed using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure. At the time of analysis, 123 of the 356 participants (34.6%) did not report any barriers to clinic attendance. For the remainder, the major reported barriers included forgetting appointments, inability to afford medicines or other treatment, and placing faith above medical care. The average A1C was 7.7%, and the average diabetes self-care summary score was 17.1 out of 35 points (with higher values indicating better self-care). Missing clinic appointments is associated with lower health outcomes, especially in vulnerable populations. This study can help educate clinic staff on perceived barriers to type 2 diabetes management among people with diabetes in Appalachia.

阿巴拉契亚地区糖尿病患者临床护理障碍的新研究
在美国,糖尿病是导致死亡的第七大原因,并且患病率持续上升,2型糖尿病占所有病例的90-95%。肯塔基州,特别是阿巴拉契亚地区的糖尿病发病率是全国最高的,而且增长速度比全国平均水平快。尽管有这种不成比例的负担,但在这一人群中尚未充分探讨临床预约出勤的障碍。作为一项正在进行的研究的一部分,本文探讨了临床就诊、血糖控制和糖尿病自我护理的感知障碍之间的关系。我们使用使用慢性护理模型开发的25项检查表来评估参与者就诊的障碍。通过A1C测量评估血糖控制情况。采用糖尿病自我护理活动摘要量表对糖尿病自我护理进行评估。在分析时,356名参与者中有123名(34.6%)没有报告任何诊所就诊障碍。对于其余的人,报告的主要障碍包括忘记预约、无力支付药品或其他治疗费用以及将信仰置于医疗保健之上。平均A1C为7.7%,平均糖尿病自我护理总结得分为17.1分(总分35分)(得分越高表明自我护理越好)。错过诊所预约与较低的健康结果有关,特别是在弱势群体中。本研究可以帮助临床工作人员了解阿巴拉契亚地区糖尿病患者管理2型糖尿病的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信