Spending and Job-Finding Impacts of Expanded Unemployment Benefits: Evidence from Administrative Micro Data

Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.3386/w30315
Peter Ganong, Fiona Greig, P. Noel, Daniel G. Sullivan, Joseph Vavra
{"title":"Spending and Job-Finding Impacts of Expanded Unemployment Benefits: Evidence from Administrative Micro Data","authors":"Peter Ganong, Fiona Greig, P. Noel, Daniel G. Sullivan, Joseph Vavra","doi":"10.3386/w30315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in U.S. history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics— during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally lowliquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for persistent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool. ∗We thank Joe Altonji, Adrien Auclert, Gabriel Chodorow-Reich, Arin Dube, Jason Furman, Jon Gruber, Greg Kaplan, Rohan Kekre, Bruce Meyer, Matt Notowidigdo, Heather Sarsons, Jesse Shapiro, Daphne Skandalis, Amir Sufi, and Rob Vishny for helpful conversations, and seminar participants at the AEA, Berkeley, BFI China, BFI Macro Finance, Boston Fed, CFPB, Chicago Booth Micro, Macro, and Finance Lunches, Clemson, Columbia, Empirical Macro Workshop-LA, Federal Reserve Board, Insper, Johns Hopkins, Kellogg, NBER Labor Studies, Public Finance and EFG, MIT, Montana, OECD, Opportunity Insights, RAND, Richmond Fed, SED, SITE, SOLE, University of Texas, the Upjohn Institute, UIUC, VMACS, Washington University St. Louis, and Yale for suggestions. We thank Maxwell Liebeskind, who was a coauthor on several of the earlier JPMCI policy briefs on pandemic UI. We thank Samantha Anderson, Timotej Cejka, Rupsha Debnath, Jonas Enders, Isaac Liu, Michael Meyer, Liam Purkey, Peter Robertson, John Spence, Nicolas Wuthenow, and Katie Zhang for excellent research assistance. We thank the Becker Friedman Institute and the Kathryn and Grant Swick Faculty Research Fund at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business for financial support. This research was made possible by a data-use agreement between three of the authors and the JPMorgan Chase Institute (JPMCI), which has created de-identified data assets that are selectively available to be used for academic research. All statistics from JPMCI data, including medians, reflect cells with multiple observations. The opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not represent the views of JPMorgan Chase & Co.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w30315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in U.S. history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics— during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally lowliquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for persistent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool. ∗We thank Joe Altonji, Adrien Auclert, Gabriel Chodorow-Reich, Arin Dube, Jason Furman, Jon Gruber, Greg Kaplan, Rohan Kekre, Bruce Meyer, Matt Notowidigdo, Heather Sarsons, Jesse Shapiro, Daphne Skandalis, Amir Sufi, and Rob Vishny for helpful conversations, and seminar participants at the AEA, Berkeley, BFI China, BFI Macro Finance, Boston Fed, CFPB, Chicago Booth Micro, Macro, and Finance Lunches, Clemson, Columbia, Empirical Macro Workshop-LA, Federal Reserve Board, Insper, Johns Hopkins, Kellogg, NBER Labor Studies, Public Finance and EFG, MIT, Montana, OECD, Opportunity Insights, RAND, Richmond Fed, SED, SITE, SOLE, University of Texas, the Upjohn Institute, UIUC, VMACS, Washington University St. Louis, and Yale for suggestions. We thank Maxwell Liebeskind, who was a coauthor on several of the earlier JPMCI policy briefs on pandemic UI. We thank Samantha Anderson, Timotej Cejka, Rupsha Debnath, Jonas Enders, Isaac Liu, Michael Meyer, Liam Purkey, Peter Robertson, John Spence, Nicolas Wuthenow, and Katie Zhang for excellent research assistance. We thank the Becker Friedman Institute and the Kathryn and Grant Swick Faculty Research Fund at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business for financial support. This research was made possible by a data-use agreement between three of the authors and the JPMorgan Chase Institute (JPMCI), which has created de-identified data assets that are selectively available to be used for academic research. All statistics from JPMCI data, including medians, reflect cells with multiple observations. The opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not represent the views of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
分享
查看原文
失业救济扩大对支出和就业的影响:来自行政微观数据的证据
我们表明,美国历史上最大的失业救济金增长对支出产生了很大的影响,对就业的影响很小。这一发现有三个含义。首先,在大流行期间,增加的福利对于解释总支出动态(而不是就业动态)很重要。其次,福利扩张使我们能够研究流动性通常较低的家庭在高流动性状态下的MPC。这些家庭的mpc仍然很高。这表明,持续的行为特征,而不仅仅是当前的流动性,在推动消费行为方面发挥了作用。第三,驱动我们研究结果的机制表明,临时福利补充是一种有希望的反周期工具。*我们感谢Joe Altonji、Adrien Auclert、Gabriel Chodorow-Reich、Arin Dube、Jason Furman、Jon Gruber、Greg Kaplan、Rohan Kekre、Bruce Meyer、Matt Notowidigdo、Heather Sarsons、Jesse Shapiro、Daphne Skandalis、Amir Sufi和Rob Vishny在AEA、伯克利、BFI中国、BFI宏观金融、波士顿联邦储备银行、CFPB、芝加哥Booth微观、宏观和金融午餐、克莱姆森、哥伦比亚、洛杉矶实证宏观研讨会、联邦储备委员会、Insper、约翰霍普金斯、凯洛格,NBER劳工研究,公共财政和EFG,麻省理工学院,蒙大拿州,经合组织,机会洞察,兰德公司,里士满联邦储备银行,SED, SITE, SOLE,德克萨斯大学,厄普约翰研究所,UIUC, VMACS,华盛顿大学圣路易斯分校和耶鲁大学提供建议。我们感谢麦克斯韦·里伯斯金(Maxwell Liebeskind),他是JPMCI早期几份关于大流行UI的政策简报的合著者。我们感谢Samantha Anderson、Timotej Cejka、Rupsha Debnath、Jonas Enders、Isaac Liu、Michael Meyer、Liam Purkey、Peter Robertson、John Spence、Nicolas Wuthenow和Katie Zhang出色的研究协助。我们感谢贝克尔·弗里德曼研究所和芝加哥大学布斯商学院凯瑟琳和格兰特·斯维克教师研究基金的财政支持。这项研究是由三位作者与摩根大通研究所(JPMCI)之间的数据使用协议实现的,摩根大通研究所创建了去识别的数据资产,可选择性地用于学术研究。JPMCI数据的所有统计数据,包括中位数,都反映了多次观察的细胞。本文仅代表作者个人观点,不代表摩根大通公司的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信