Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction

IF 6.9 Q1 Environmental Science
Yingxin Zhao , Zhifan Yang , Jiaojiao Niu , Zihan Du , Conti Federica , Zhe Zhu , Kaichao Yang , Yan Li , Baofeng Zhao , Thomas Helmer Pedersen , Chunguang Liu , Mutabazi Emmanuel
{"title":"Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction","authors":"Yingxin Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhifan Yang ,&nbsp;Jiaojiao Niu ,&nbsp;Zihan Du ,&nbsp;Conti Federica ,&nbsp;Zhe Zhu ,&nbsp;Kaichao Yang ,&nbsp;Yan Li ,&nbsp;Baofeng Zhao ,&nbsp;Thomas Helmer Pedersen ,&nbsp;Chunguang Liu ,&nbsp;Mutabazi Emmanuel","doi":"10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to comprehensively analyze the Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions from current sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies (building material, landfill, land spreading, anaerobic digestion, and thermochemical processes) based on the database of Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) from 1998 to 2020. The general patterns, spatial distribution, and hotspots were provided by bibliometric analysis. A comparative quantitative analysis based on life cycle assessment (LCA) put forward the current emission situation and the key influencing factors of different technologies. The effective GHG emissions reduction methods were proposed to mitigate climate change. Results showed that incineration or building materials manufacturing of highly dewatered sludge, and land spreading after anaerobic digestion have the best GHG emissions reduction benefits. Biological treatment technologies and thermochemical processes have great potential for reducing GHGs. Enhancement of pretreatment effect, co-digestion, and new technologies (e.g., injection of carbon dioxide, directional acidification) are major approaches to facilitate substitution emissions in sludge anaerobic digestion. The relationship between the quality and efficiency of secondary energy in thermochemical process and GHGs emission still needs further study. Solid sludge products generated by bio-stabilization or thermochemical processes are considered to have a certain carbon sequestration value and can improve the soil environment to control GHG emissions. The findings are useful for future development and processes selection of sludge treatment and disposal facing carbon footprint reduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental sciences","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 224-249"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074222004016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyze the Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions from current sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies (building material, landfill, land spreading, anaerobic digestion, and thermochemical processes) based on the database of Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) from 1998 to 2020. The general patterns, spatial distribution, and hotspots were provided by bibliometric analysis. A comparative quantitative analysis based on life cycle assessment (LCA) put forward the current emission situation and the key influencing factors of different technologies. The effective GHG emissions reduction methods were proposed to mitigate climate change. Results showed that incineration or building materials manufacturing of highly dewatered sludge, and land spreading after anaerobic digestion have the best GHG emissions reduction benefits. Biological treatment technologies and thermochemical processes have great potential for reducing GHGs. Enhancement of pretreatment effect, co-digestion, and new technologies (e.g., injection of carbon dioxide, directional acidification) are major approaches to facilitate substitution emissions in sludge anaerobic digestion. The relationship between the quality and efficiency of secondary energy in thermochemical process and GHGs emission still needs further study. Solid sludge products generated by bio-stabilization or thermochemical processes are considered to have a certain carbon sequestration value and can improve the soil environment to control GHG emissions. The findings are useful for future development and processes selection of sludge treatment and disposal facing carbon footprint reduction.

系统分析污泥处理处置技术对减少碳足迹的影响
本研究旨在基于科学引文索引(SCI)和社会科学引文索引数据库,综合分析1998年至2020年当前污泥处理和处置技术(建筑材料、垃圾填埋、土地扩展、厌氧消化和热化学过程)的温室气体排放情况。文献计量学分析提供了总体格局、空间分布和热点。基于生命周期评价(LCA)的比较定量分析提出了不同技术的排放现状和关键影响因素。为缓解气候变化,提出了有效的温室气体减排方法。结果表明,焚烧或建筑材料制造高度脱水的污泥,以及厌氧消化后的土地扩展具有最佳的GHG减排效益。生物处理技术和热化学工艺在减少温室气体方面具有巨大潜力。提高预处理效果、共消化和新技术(如注入二氧化碳、定向酸化)是促进污泥厌氧消化中替代排放的主要途径。热化学过程中二次能量的质量和效率与温室气体排放之间的关系仍有待进一步研究。生物稳定或热化学过程产生的固体污泥产物被认为具有一定的固碳价值,可以改善土壤环境,控制GHG排放。这些发现对未来污泥处理和处置的发展和工艺选择有助于减少碳足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental sciences
Journal of environmental sciences Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Sciences is an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1989. It is sponsored by the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and it is jointly published by Elsevier and Science Press. It aims to foster interdisciplinary communication and promote understanding of significant environmental issues. The journal seeks to publish significant and novel research on the fate and behaviour of emerging contaminants, human impact on the environment, human exposure to environmental contaminants and their health effects, and environmental remediation and management. Original research articles, critical reviews, highlights, and perspectives of high quality are published both in print and online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信