Fecal Occult Blood Test, Is it still worth for Colorectal Cancer Screening?

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Ahmet Cem Esmer, Şevket Cumhur Yeğen
{"title":"Fecal Occult Blood Test, Is it still worth for Colorectal Cancer Screening?","authors":"Ahmet Cem Esmer,&nbsp;Şevket Cumhur Yeğen","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One of the most critical factors determining survival in terms of colorectal cancers is diagnosis and treatment at an early stage. Diagnosis at an early stage is possible with screening programs carried out within preventive health services. In this study, we aimed to compare the results of patients who underwent colonoscopy due to fecal occult blood test (FOBT) positivity with those over 50 years of age who underwent colonoscopy with other complaints and to reveal whether FOBT test is still essential for screening programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent colonoscopy between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were analyzed in two groups according to colonoscopy reasons: group I (FOBT-positive) and group II (other reasons).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3393 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups for evaluation. Patients who underwent colonoscopy for FOBT positivity (Group I) and patients over 50 years of age who underwent colonoscopy for other reasons (Group II). When the colonoscopy findings were compared between the groups&apos; inflammatory bowel diseases (p=0,03) were higher in group I, while normal colonoscopy (p=0,03) was found to be more common in group II. Polyps, malignancy, diverticulosis, and perianal diseases seem similar between the groups statistically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FOBT can still be used in colorectal screening because it is inexpensive, widely available, has more participation due to non-invasiveness, and can be applied outside of clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most critical factors determining survival in terms of colorectal cancers is diagnosis and treatment at an early stage. Diagnosis at an early stage is possible with screening programs carried out within preventive health services. In this study, we aimed to compare the results of patients who underwent colonoscopy due to fecal occult blood test (FOBT) positivity with those over 50 years of age who underwent colonoscopy with other complaints and to reveal whether FOBT test is still essential for screening programs.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent colonoscopy between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were analyzed in two groups according to colonoscopy reasons: group I (FOBT-positive) and group II (other reasons).

Results: A total of 3393 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups for evaluation. Patients who underwent colonoscopy for FOBT positivity (Group I) and patients over 50 years of age who underwent colonoscopy for other reasons (Group II). When the colonoscopy findings were compared between the groups' inflammatory bowel diseases (p=0,03) were higher in group I, while normal colonoscopy (p=0,03) was found to be more common in group II. Polyps, malignancy, diverticulosis, and perianal diseases seem similar between the groups statistically.

Conclusion: FOBT can still be used in colorectal screening because it is inexpensive, widely available, has more participation due to non-invasiveness, and can be applied outside of clinical settings.

粪便潜血试验对结直肠癌筛查是否仍有价值?
前言:决定结直肠癌患者生存的最关键因素之一是早期的诊断和治疗。通过在预防性保健服务机构内开展筛查方案,可以在早期阶段进行诊断。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较因粪便隐血检查(FOBT)阳性而进行结肠镜检查的患者与50岁以上因其他疾病进行结肠镜检查的患者的结果,并揭示FOBT检查是否仍然是筛查计划的必要条件。方法:本研究纳入了2016年1月至2021年12月期间接受结肠镜检查的患者。根据结肠镜检查原因将患者分为两组:I组(fobt阳性)和II组(其他原因)。结果:共纳入3393例患者。将患者分为两组进行评估。因FOBT阳性接受结肠镜检查的患者(I组)和年龄超过50岁因其他原因接受结肠镜检查的患者(II组)。炎性肠病(p= 0.03)在ⅰ组较高,而正常结肠镜检查(p= 0.03)在ⅱ组较常见。息肉、恶性肿瘤、憩室病和肛周疾病在组间的统计学上似乎相似。结论:FOBT仍可用于结直肠筛查,因为它价格低廉,可广泛使用,由于无创性而有更多的参与,并且可以在临床环境之外应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信