Do haematological parameters such as HALP and Lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer?

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Mevlüt Yordanagil, Hüseyin Bakir, Gülhan Güler Avci, Murat Yildirim, Namik Ozkan, Okan Ismail
{"title":"Do haematological parameters such as HALP and Lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer?","authors":"Mevlüt Yordanagil,&nbsp;Hüseyin Bakir,&nbsp;Gülhan Güler Avci,&nbsp;Murat Yildirim,&nbsp;Namik Ozkan,&nbsp;Okan Ismail","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.0959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractAim:Inflammatory markers are effective in determining the prognosis of malignant diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of HALP and LCR with tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and their effects on prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>88 patients who received nCRT with the diagnosis of LARC were included in the study. First, all patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with pathological and clinical complete response (pCR+cCR) group 1 and patients with non-complete response group 2. The 82 patients who underwent surgery were divided into two groups according to the TRG Dworak: good response and poor response groups. Inflammation markers such as HALP and LCR were obtained using biochemical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HALP and LCR were higher in the complete response group than in the none-complete response group (p&lt;0.05). When TRG 3-4 (good response group) and TRG 0-1-2 (poor response group) were compared, HALP and LCR were higher in the good response group (p&lt;0.05). The cut-off point for the HALP value was 30.17, the sensitivity was 88.2%, and the specificity was 43.7%. The cut-off point for the LCR value was 0.402, the sensitivity was 88.2%, and the specificity was 63.4%. It was found that HALP and LCR calculated prior to neoadjuvant CRT could not predict overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We believe that inflammatory markers such as HALP and LCR can effectively identify rectal cancer patients who respond best to nCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.0959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractAim:Inflammatory markers are effective in determining the prognosis of malignant diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of HALP and LCR with tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and their effects on prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods: 88 patients who received nCRT with the diagnosis of LARC were included in the study. First, all patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with pathological and clinical complete response (pCR+cCR) group 1 and patients with non-complete response group 2. The 82 patients who underwent surgery were divided into two groups according to the TRG Dworak: good response and poor response groups. Inflammation markers such as HALP and LCR were obtained using biochemical parameters.

Results: HALP and LCR were higher in the complete response group than in the none-complete response group (p<0.05). When TRG 3-4 (good response group) and TRG 0-1-2 (poor response group) were compared, HALP and LCR were higher in the good response group (p<0.05). The cut-off point for the HALP value was 30.17, the sensitivity was 88.2%, and the specificity was 43.7%. The cut-off point for the LCR value was 0.402, the sensitivity was 88.2%, and the specificity was 63.4%. It was found that HALP and LCR calculated prior to neoadjuvant CRT could not predict overall survival.

Conclusions: We believe that inflammatory markers such as HALP and LCR can effectively identify rectal cancer patients who respond best to nCRT.

血液学参数如HALP和淋巴细胞与c反应蛋白的比值能预测局部晚期直肠癌对新辅助放化疗的肿瘤反应吗?
摘要:炎症标志物是判断恶性疾病预后的有效指标。本研究旨在探讨局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗后HALP和LCR与肿瘤反应的关系及其对预后的影响。方法:88例诊断为LARC的患者接受了nCRT治疗。首先将所有患者分为病理和临床完全缓解(pCR+cCR)组1和非完全缓解组2。将82例手术患者根据TRG dwork分为两组:反应良好组和反应不良组。采用生化参数测定炎症标志物HALP、LCR。结果:完全缓解组的HALP和LCR高于非完全缓解组(p < 0.05)。比较TRG 3-4(好反应组)和TRG 0-1-2(差反应组),好反应组的HALP和LCR更高(p < 0.05)。HALP值的临界值为30.17,敏感性为88.2%,特异性为43.7%。LCR值的分界点为0.402,敏感性为88.2%,特异性为63.4%。发现在新辅助CRT前计算的HALP和LCR不能预测总生存期。结论:我们认为炎症标志物如HALP和LCR可以有效识别对nCRT反应最好的直肠癌患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信