{"title":"Surgical management of gastroschisis with the use of primary and staged closure based on the department's 20-year experience.","authors":"Patrycja Sosnowska-Sienkiewicz, Ewa Bućko, Dominika Skinder, Przemysław Mańkowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.2122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstractbackground: </strong>Gastroschisis is a common developmental anomaly of the abdominal front wall. The aim of surgical management is to restore the integrity of the abdominal wall and to insert the bowel into the abdominal cavity with the use of the primary or staged closure technique.The objective of this paper is to analyze our 20-year experience with surgical treatment of gastroschisis with primary and staged closure, to compare the postoperative course for the said techniques as well as to identify factors influencing the course and early results of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research materials consist of a retrospective analysis of medical history of patients treated at the Pediatric Surgery Clinic in Poznan over 20 years period from 2000 to 2019. 59 patients were operated on: 30 girls and 29 boys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical treatment was performed in all the cases. Primary closure was performed in 32% of the cases, whereas staged silo closure was performed in 68% of the cases. Postoperative analgosedation was used for 6 days on average after primary closures, and 13 days on average after staged closures. Generalized bacterial infection was present in 21% of patients treated with primary closures and 37% for staged closures. Infants treated with staged closure began enteral feeding considerably later (day 22) than those treated with primary closure (day 12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is not possible to indicate clearly which surgical technique is superior to the other based on the results obtained. When choosing the treatment method, the patient's clinical condition, associated anomalies, and the medical team's experience must be taken into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstractbackground: Gastroschisis is a common developmental anomaly of the abdominal front wall. The aim of surgical management is to restore the integrity of the abdominal wall and to insert the bowel into the abdominal cavity with the use of the primary or staged closure technique.The objective of this paper is to analyze our 20-year experience with surgical treatment of gastroschisis with primary and staged closure, to compare the postoperative course for the said techniques as well as to identify factors influencing the course and early results of treatment.
Methods: The research materials consist of a retrospective analysis of medical history of patients treated at the Pediatric Surgery Clinic in Poznan over 20 years period from 2000 to 2019. 59 patients were operated on: 30 girls and 29 boys.
Results: Surgical treatment was performed in all the cases. Primary closure was performed in 32% of the cases, whereas staged silo closure was performed in 68% of the cases. Postoperative analgosedation was used for 6 days on average after primary closures, and 13 days on average after staged closures. Generalized bacterial infection was present in 21% of patients treated with primary closures and 37% for staged closures. Infants treated with staged closure began enteral feeding considerably later (day 22) than those treated with primary closure (day 12).
Conclusions: It is not possible to indicate clearly which surgical technique is superior to the other based on the results obtained. When choosing the treatment method, the patient's clinical condition, associated anomalies, and the medical team's experience must be taken into consideration.