Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: A Bi-National Database Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Swetha Prabhakaran, Sowmya Prabhakaran, Wei Mou Lim, Glen Guerra, Alexander G Heriot, Joseph C Kong
{"title":"Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: A Bi-National Database Study.","authors":"Swetha Prabhakaran,&nbsp;Sowmya Prabhakaran,&nbsp;Wei Mou Lim,&nbsp;Glen Guerra,&nbsp;Alexander G Heriot,&nbsp;Joseph C Kong","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAnastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication following colorectal surgery. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the development of AL and analyze its impact on survival.Materials and MethodsAll consecutive adult colorectal cancer resections with curative intent and anastomosis formation were included from a prospectively maintained bi-national database between 2007 and 2020. The primary outcome measure was the rate of AL. The secondary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival (OS).ResultsThere were 7566 eligible patients. The rate of AL was 2.3% and 4.4% in patients with colon and rectal cancer respectively. AL was a significant independent predictor of reduced 5-year OS in patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer (Odds ratio 1.999, p = 0.017). Emergency surgery (p = 0.013), surgery at a public hospital (p &lt; 0.01), and an open surgical approach (p = 0.002) were all significantly associated with a higher risk of AL in patients with colon cancer, with higher rates of AL noted in left colectomies as compared to right hemicolectomies (6.8% vs 1.6%, p &lt; 0.05). In rectal cancer patients, ultra-low anterior resections had the highest risk of AL (4.6%), and associations were found with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.011), surgery in a public hospital (p = 0.019), and an open approach (p = 0.035). Anastomosis formation technique (hand-sewn vs stapled) did not impact on rate of AL.DiscussionClinicians should be cognizant of the predictive factors for AL and consider early intervention for patients at risk of this.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAnastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication following colorectal surgery. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the development of AL and analyze its impact on survival.Materials and MethodsAll consecutive adult colorectal cancer resections with curative intent and anastomosis formation were included from a prospectively maintained bi-national database between 2007 and 2020. The primary outcome measure was the rate of AL. The secondary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival (OS).ResultsThere were 7566 eligible patients. The rate of AL was 2.3% and 4.4% in patients with colon and rectal cancer respectively. AL was a significant independent predictor of reduced 5-year OS in patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer (Odds ratio 1.999, p = 0.017). Emergency surgery (p = 0.013), surgery at a public hospital (p < 0.01), and an open surgical approach (p = 0.002) were all significantly associated with a higher risk of AL in patients with colon cancer, with higher rates of AL noted in left colectomies as compared to right hemicolectomies (6.8% vs 1.6%, p < 0.05). In rectal cancer patients, ultra-low anterior resections had the highest risk of AL (4.6%), and associations were found with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.011), surgery in a public hospital (p = 0.019), and an open approach (p = 0.035). Anastomosis formation technique (hand-sewn vs stapled) did not impact on rate of AL.DiscussionClinicians should be cognizant of the predictive factors for AL and consider early intervention for patients at risk of this.

结直肠手术吻合口漏的预测因素:一项两国数据库研究。
吻合口漏(AL)是结直肠手术后的严重并发症。本研究旨在确定与AL发展相关的因素,并分析其对生存的影响。材料和方法纳入2007年至2020年期间前瞻性维护的双国数据库中所有具有治疗目的和吻合形成的连续成人结直肠癌切除术。主要结局指标是AL的发生率。次要结局指标是5年总生存期(OS)。结果入选患者7566例。结肠癌和直肠癌患者AL的发生率分别为2.3%和4.4%。AL是直肠癌根治性手术患者5年OS降低的重要独立预测因子(优势比1.999,p = 0.017)。急诊手术(p = 0.013)、公立医院手术(p <0.01)和开放手术入路(p = 0.002)均与结肠癌患者AL风险升高显著相关,左侧结肠切除术的AL发生率高于右侧半结肠切除术(6.8% vs 1.6%, p <0.05)。在直肠癌患者中,超低前切除术发生AL的风险最高(4.6%),与新辅助化疗(p = 0.011)、公立医院手术(p = 0.019)和开放入路(p = 0.035)相关。吻合口形成技术(手工缝合或钉接)对AL的发生率没有影响。讨论临床医生应认识到AL的预测因素,并考虑对有此风险的患者进行早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信