Sociodemographic differences in quality of treatment to Medicaid enrollees receiving buprenorphine.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rachel K Landis, Jonathan S Levin, Brendan Saloner, Adam J Gordon, Andrew W Dick, Tisamarie B Sherry, Douglas L Leslie, Mark Sorbero, Bradley D Stein
{"title":"Sociodemographic differences in quality of treatment to Medicaid enrollees receiving buprenorphine.","authors":"Rachel K Landis, Jonathan S Levin, Brendan Saloner, Adam J Gordon, Andrew W Dick, Tisamarie B Sherry, Douglas L Leslie, Mark Sorbero, Bradley D Stein","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2022.2060424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Buprenorphine is a key medication to treat opioid use disorder, but little is known about how treatment quality varies across sociodemographic groups. Objective: We examined measures of treatment quality and explored variation by sociodemographic factors. <i>Methods:</i> We used Medicaid MAX data from 50 states from 2006 to 2014 to identify buprenorphine treatment episodes (<i>N</i> = 317,494). We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the quality of buprenorphine treatment along four dimensions: (1) sufficient duration, (2) effective dosage, and concurrent prescribing of (3) opioid analgesics and (4) benzodiazepines. We explored how quality varied by race/ethnicity, age, sex, and urbanicity. <i>Results:</i> In adjusted models, compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals had lower odds of receiving effective dosage (aORs = 0.79 and 0.89, respectively) and sufficient duration (aORs = 0.64 and 0.71, respectively), and lower odds of concurrent prescribing of opioid analgesics (aORs = 0.86 and 0.85, respectively) and benzodiazepines (aORs = 0.51 and 0.59, respectively). Older individuals had higher odds of sufficient duration (aORs from 1.21-1.33), but also had higher odds of concurrent opioid analgesics prescribing (aORs from 1.29-1.56) and benzodiazepines (aORs from 1.44-1.99). Females had higher odds of sufficient duration (aOR = 1.12), but lower odds of effective dosage (aOR = 0.77) and higher odds of concurrent prescribing of opioid analgesics (aOR = 1.25) and benzodiazepines (aOR = 1.16). Compared to individuals living in metropolitan areas, individuals living in non-metropolitan areas had higher odds of sufficient duration (aORs = 1.11 and 1.24) and effective dosage (aORs = 1.06 and 1.33), and lower odds of concurrent prescribing (aORs from 0.81-0.98). <i>Conclusions:</i> Black and Hispanic individuals were less likely to receive effective buprenorphine dosage and sufficient duration. Quality results were mixed for older and female individuals; although these individuals were more likely to receive treatment of sufficient duration, they were also more likely to be concurrently prescribed potentially contraindicated medications, and females were less likely to receive effective dosage. Findings raise concerns about adequacy of care for minority and other at-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":"43 1","pages":"1057-1071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2022.2060424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Buprenorphine is a key medication to treat opioid use disorder, but little is known about how treatment quality varies across sociodemographic groups. Objective: We examined measures of treatment quality and explored variation by sociodemographic factors. Methods: We used Medicaid MAX data from 50 states from 2006 to 2014 to identify buprenorphine treatment episodes (N = 317,494). We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the quality of buprenorphine treatment along four dimensions: (1) sufficient duration, (2) effective dosage, and concurrent prescribing of (3) opioid analgesics and (4) benzodiazepines. We explored how quality varied by race/ethnicity, age, sex, and urbanicity. Results: In adjusted models, compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals had lower odds of receiving effective dosage (aORs = 0.79 and 0.89, respectively) and sufficient duration (aORs = 0.64 and 0.71, respectively), and lower odds of concurrent prescribing of opioid analgesics (aORs = 0.86 and 0.85, respectively) and benzodiazepines (aORs = 0.51 and 0.59, respectively). Older individuals had higher odds of sufficient duration (aORs from 1.21-1.33), but also had higher odds of concurrent opioid analgesics prescribing (aORs from 1.29-1.56) and benzodiazepines (aORs from 1.44-1.99). Females had higher odds of sufficient duration (aOR = 1.12), but lower odds of effective dosage (aOR = 0.77) and higher odds of concurrent prescribing of opioid analgesics (aOR = 1.25) and benzodiazepines (aOR = 1.16). Compared to individuals living in metropolitan areas, individuals living in non-metropolitan areas had higher odds of sufficient duration (aORs = 1.11 and 1.24) and effective dosage (aORs = 1.06 and 1.33), and lower odds of concurrent prescribing (aORs from 0.81-0.98). Conclusions: Black and Hispanic individuals were less likely to receive effective buprenorphine dosage and sufficient duration. Quality results were mixed for older and female individuals; although these individuals were more likely to receive treatment of sufficient duration, they were also more likely to be concurrently prescribed potentially contraindicated medications, and females were less likely to receive effective dosage. Findings raise concerns about adequacy of care for minority and other at-risk populations.

接受丁丙诺啡的医疗补助参保者治疗质量的社会人口统计学差异。
背景:丁丙诺啡是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的关键药物,但对不同社会人口群体的治疗质量差异知之甚少。目的:我们检查了治疗质量的措施,并探讨了社会人口因素的变化。方法:我们使用2006年至2014年50个州的Medicaid MAX数据来确定丁丙诺啡治疗事件(N = 317,494)。我们采用多变量logistic回归从四个方面考察丁丙诺啡治疗的质量:(1)足够的持续时间,(2)有效剂量,以及同时处方(3)阿片类镇痛药和(4)苯二氮卓类药物。我们探讨了质量如何随种族/民族、年龄、性别和城市化而变化。结果:在调整后的模型中,与非西班牙裔白人相比,非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔个体获得有效剂量(aORs分别为0.79和0.89)和足够持续时间(aORs分别为0.64和0.71)的几率较低,同时开具阿片类镇痛药(aORs分别为0.86和0.85)和苯二氮卓类药物(aORs分别为0.51和0.59)的几率较低。老年人有较高的持续时间(aORs为1.21-1.33),但同时使用阿片类镇痛药(aORs为1.29-1.56)和苯二氮卓类药物(aORs为1.44-1.99)的几率也较高。女性获得足够持续时间的几率较高(aOR = 1.12),但获得有效剂量的几率较低(aOR = 0.77),同时使用阿片类镇痛药(aOR = 1.25)和苯二氮卓类药物(aOR = 1.16)的几率较高。与大都市地区的个体相比,非大都市地区的个体获得充足持续时间(aORs = 1.11和1.24)和有效剂量(aORs = 1.06和1.33)的几率更高,同时开具处方的几率更低(aORs为0.81 ~ 0.98)。结论:黑人和西班牙裔个体接受丁丙诺啡有效剂量和足够持续时间的可能性较小。老年人和女性个体的质量结果好坏参半;虽然这些人更有可能接受足够时间的治疗,但他们也更有可能同时服用潜在的禁忌症药物,而女性接受有效剂量的可能性更小。调查结果引起了对少数民族和其他高危人群护理是否充分的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信