Updated Parkinson's disease motor subtypes classification and correlation to cerebrospinal homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christopher Adams , Jessika Suescun , Anam Haque , Kelly Block , Shivika Chandra , Timothy M. Ellmore , Mya C. Schiess
{"title":"Updated Parkinson's disease motor subtypes classification and correlation to cerebrospinal homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels","authors":"Christopher Adams ,&nbsp;Jessika Suescun ,&nbsp;Anam Haque ,&nbsp;Kelly Block ,&nbsp;Shivika Chandra ,&nbsp;Timothy M. Ellmore ,&nbsp;Mya C. Schiess","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Motor classifications of Parkinson's Disease (PD) have been widely used. This paper aims to update a subtype classification using the MDS-UPDRS-III and determine if cerebrospinal neurotransmitter profiles (HVA and 5-HIAA) differ between these subtypes in a cohort from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS scores were collected for 20 PD patients. Akinetic-rigid (AR), Tremor-dominant (TD), and Mixed (MX) subtypes were calculated using a formula derived from UPDRS, and a new ratio was developed for subtyping patients with the MDS-UPDRS. This new formula was subsequently applied to 95 PD patients from the PPMI dataset, and subtyping was correlated to neurotransmitter levels.<!--> <!-->Data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic models and ANOVA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to previous UPDRS classifications, the new MDS-UPDRS TD/AR ratios produced significant areas under the curve (AUC) for each subtype. The optimal sensitivity and specificity cutoff scores were ≥0.82 for TD, ≤0.71 for AR, and &gt;0.71 and &lt;0.82 for Mixed. Analysis of variance showed that the AR group had significantly lower HVA and 5-HIAA levels than the TD and HC groups. A logistic model using neurotransmitter levels and MDS-UPDRS-III could predict the subtype classification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This MDS-UPDRS motor classification system provides a method to transition from the original UPDRS to the new MDS-UPDRS. It is a reliable and quantifiable subtyping tool for monitoring disease progression. The TD subtype is associated with lower motor scores and higher HVA levels, while the AR subtype is associated with higher motor scores and lower 5-HIAA levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/57/main.PMC9922918.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112523000051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Motor classifications of Parkinson's Disease (PD) have been widely used. This paper aims to update a subtype classification using the MDS-UPDRS-III and determine if cerebrospinal neurotransmitter profiles (HVA and 5-HIAA) differ between these subtypes in a cohort from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI).

Methods

UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS scores were collected for 20 PD patients. Akinetic-rigid (AR), Tremor-dominant (TD), and Mixed (MX) subtypes were calculated using a formula derived from UPDRS, and a new ratio was developed for subtyping patients with the MDS-UPDRS. This new formula was subsequently applied to 95 PD patients from the PPMI dataset, and subtyping was correlated to neurotransmitter levels. Data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic models and ANOVA.

Results

Compared to previous UPDRS classifications, the new MDS-UPDRS TD/AR ratios produced significant areas under the curve (AUC) for each subtype. The optimal sensitivity and specificity cutoff scores were ≥0.82 for TD, ≤0.71 for AR, and >0.71 and <0.82 for Mixed. Analysis of variance showed that the AR group had significantly lower HVA and 5-HIAA levels than the TD and HC groups. A logistic model using neurotransmitter levels and MDS-UPDRS-III could predict the subtype classification.

Conclusions

This MDS-UPDRS motor classification system provides a method to transition from the original UPDRS to the new MDS-UPDRS. It is a reliable and quantifiable subtyping tool for monitoring disease progression. The TD subtype is associated with lower motor scores and higher HVA levels, while the AR subtype is associated with higher motor scores and lower 5-HIAA levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

最新帕金森病运动亚型分类及其与脑脊髓同源香草酸和5-羟基吲哚乙酸水平的相关性
帕金森病(PD)的运动分类已被广泛应用。本文旨在使用MDS-UPDRS-III更新亚型分类,并确定帕金森病进展标志物倡议(PPMI)队列中脑脊神经递质谱(HVA和5-HIAA)在这些亚型之间是否存在差异。方法收集20例PD患者的supdrs和MDS-UPDRS评分。使用UPDRS导出的公式计算动刚型(AR)、震颤型(TD)和混合型(MX)亚型,并为MDS-UPDRS亚型患者制定了新的比例。这个新公式随后应用于来自PPMI数据集的95名PD患者,亚型与神经递质水平相关。数据分析采用受试者工作特征模型和方差分析。结果与以前的UPDRS分类相比,新的MDS-UPDRS TD/AR比率对每个亚型都产生了显著的曲线下面积(AUC)。最佳灵敏度和特异度临界值分别为:TD≥0.82,AR≤0.71,Mixed≥0.71,lt≤0.82。方差分析显示,AR组HVA和5-HIAA水平明显低于TD和HC组。使用神经递质水平和MDS-UPDRS-III的logistic模型可以预测亚型分类。结论该MDS-UPDRS运动分类系统提供了一种从原来的UPDRS向新的MDS-UPDRS过渡的方法。它是监测疾病进展的可靠和可量化的亚型工具。TD亚型与较低的运动评分和较高的HVA水平相关,而AR亚型与较高的运动评分和较低的5-HIAA水平相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信