Child rearing and parenting programs among First Nations' populations in high-income countries: a bibliometric review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amy Waller, Ama Ampofo, Jamie Bryant, Robert W Sanson-Fisher
{"title":"Child rearing and parenting programs among First Nations' populations in high-income countries: a bibliometric review.","authors":"Amy Waller,&nbsp;Ama Ampofo,&nbsp;Jamie Bryant,&nbsp;Robert W Sanson-Fisher","doi":"10.1071/AH22073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives We set out to examine the volume, scope and quality of research related to First Nations peoples' perceptions of, and experiences with, child rearing and/or parenting programs. Methods We systematically reviewed the literature published between 2000 and 2020. Sixty-eight studies identified through electronic databases and references lists met inclusion criteria. Results The study found an 8% increase in publications in the field each year (P -value = 0.002), mostly conducted in Australia with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (n  = 29, 41%). Scope included positive and negative experiences relating to: parenting from adult (n  = 19 studies) and teenager (n  = 4) perspectives; and pregnancy, antenatal and postnatal care from the perspective of adults (n  = 23) and teenagers (n  = 2). Descriptive studies included qualitative (n  = 40; 58%), quantitative (n  = 8, 12%) or mixed methods (n  = 7, 10%). Thirteen experimental studies reported the development, acceptability and/or effectiveness of programs (19%), of which three met the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care design criteria. Conclusions Despite an overall increase in volume, research efforts do not demonstrate a clear scientific progression. Further methodologically rigorous studies examining child rearing and/or parenting programs developed in collaboration with First Nations populations are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives We set out to examine the volume, scope and quality of research related to First Nations peoples' perceptions of, and experiences with, child rearing and/or parenting programs. Methods We systematically reviewed the literature published between 2000 and 2020. Sixty-eight studies identified through electronic databases and references lists met inclusion criteria. Results The study found an 8% increase in publications in the field each year (P -value = 0.002), mostly conducted in Australia with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (n  = 29, 41%). Scope included positive and negative experiences relating to: parenting from adult (n  = 19 studies) and teenager (n  = 4) perspectives; and pregnancy, antenatal and postnatal care from the perspective of adults (n  = 23) and teenagers (n  = 2). Descriptive studies included qualitative (n  = 40; 58%), quantitative (n  = 8, 12%) or mixed methods (n  = 7, 10%). Thirteen experimental studies reported the development, acceptability and/or effectiveness of programs (19%), of which three met the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care design criteria. Conclusions Despite an overall increase in volume, research efforts do not demonstrate a clear scientific progression. Further methodologically rigorous studies examining child rearing and/or parenting programs developed in collaboration with First Nations populations are needed.

高收入国家第一民族人口中的儿童抚养和养育计划:文献计量学回顾。
我们着手检查与第一民族对儿童抚养和/或养育计划的看法和经验有关的研究的数量、范围和质量。方法系统回顾2000 - 2020年间发表的文献。通过电子数据库和参考文献列表确定的68项研究符合纳入标准。研究发现,该领域的出版物每年增加8% (P值= 0.002),主要在澳大利亚进行,研究对象为土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民(n = 29,41 %)。范围包括积极和消极的经验:从成人(n = 19项研究)和青少年(n = 4)的角度;成人(n = 23)和青少年(n = 2)的孕期、产前和产后护理情况。描述性研究包括定性研究(n = 40;58%),定量(n = 8, 12%)或混合方法(n = 7, 10%)。13项实验研究报告了项目的发展、可接受性和/或有效性(19%),其中3项符合Cochrane有效实践和护理组织设计标准。尽管数量总体上有所增加,但研究工作并未显示出明显的科学进展。需要对与第一民族合作制定的儿童抚养和/或养育方案进行进一步的方法上严格的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信