Multisite analysis of patient experience scores and risk of hospital admission: a retrospective cohort study.

Q2 Medicine
Hospital practice (1995) Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-24 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2022.2144055
Yousif M Hydoub, Karen M Fischer, Kristine T Hanson, Trevor J Coons, Laurie L Wilshusen, Tafi L Vista, Gretchen A Colbenson, M Caroline Burton, Elizabeth B Habermann, Sagar B Dugani
{"title":"Multisite analysis of patient experience scores and risk of hospital admission: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yousif M Hydoub, Karen M Fischer, Kristine T Hanson, Trevor J Coons, Laurie L Wilshusen, Tafi L Vista, Gretchen A Colbenson, M Caroline Burton, Elizabeth B Habermann, Sagar B Dugani","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2022.2144055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routinely collected patient experience scores may inform risk of patient outcomes. The objective of the study was to evaluate the risk of hospital admission within 30-days following third-party receipt of the patient experience survey and guide interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys, January 2016-July 2019, from an institution's 20 hospitals in four U.S. states. Surveys were routinely sent to patients using census sampling. We analyzed surveys received ≤60 days following discharge from patients living ≤60 miles of any of the institution's hospitals. The exposures were 19 survey items. The outcome was hospital admission within 30 days after third-party receipt of the survey. We evaluated the association of favorable (top-box) vs unfavorable (non-top-box) score for survey items with risk of 30-day hospital admission in models including patient and hospitalization characteristics and reported adjusted odds ratios (aOR [95% confidence interval]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 40,162 respondents (mean age ± standard deviation: 68.1 ± 14.0 years), 49.8% were women and 4.3% had 30-day hospital admission. Patients with 30-day hospital admission, compared to those not admitted, were more likely to be discharged from a medical service line (62.9% vs 42.3%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and have a higher Elixhauser index. Favorable vs unfavorable score for <i>hospital rating</i> was associated with lower odds of 30-day hospital admission in the overall cohort (0.88 [0.77-0.99]; <i>P</i> = 0.04), medical service line (0.81 [0.70-0.94]; <i>P</i> = 0.007), and upper tertile of Elixhauser index (0.79 [0.67-0.92]; <i>P</i> = 0.003). Favorable score for <i>recommend hospital</i> was associated with lower odds of 30-day hospital admission in the medical service line (0.83 [0.71-0.97]; <i>P</i> = 0.02) but for others (e.g. <i>cleanliness of hospital environment</i>) showed no association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In routinely collected patient experience scores, favorable <i>hospital rating</i> was associated with lower odds of 30-day hospital admission and may inform risk stratification and interventions. Evidence-based survey items linked to patient outcomes may also inform future surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2022.2144055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Routinely collected patient experience scores may inform risk of patient outcomes. The objective of the study was to evaluate the risk of hospital admission within 30-days following third-party receipt of the patient experience survey and guide interventions.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys, January 2016-July 2019, from an institution's 20 hospitals in four U.S. states. Surveys were routinely sent to patients using census sampling. We analyzed surveys received ≤60 days following discharge from patients living ≤60 miles of any of the institution's hospitals. The exposures were 19 survey items. The outcome was hospital admission within 30 days after third-party receipt of the survey. We evaluated the association of favorable (top-box) vs unfavorable (non-top-box) score for survey items with risk of 30-day hospital admission in models including patient and hospitalization characteristics and reported adjusted odds ratios (aOR [95% confidence interval]).

Results: Among 40,162 respondents (mean age ± standard deviation: 68.1 ± 14.0 years), 49.8% were women and 4.3% had 30-day hospital admission. Patients with 30-day hospital admission, compared to those not admitted, were more likely to be discharged from a medical service line (62.9% vs 42.3%; P < 0.001) and have a higher Elixhauser index. Favorable vs unfavorable score for hospital rating was associated with lower odds of 30-day hospital admission in the overall cohort (0.88 [0.77-0.99]; P = 0.04), medical service line (0.81 [0.70-0.94]; P = 0.007), and upper tertile of Elixhauser index (0.79 [0.67-0.92]; P = 0.003). Favorable score for recommend hospital was associated with lower odds of 30-day hospital admission in the medical service line (0.83 [0.71-0.97]; P = 0.02) but for others (e.g. cleanliness of hospital environment) showed no association.

Conclusion: In routinely collected patient experience scores, favorable hospital rating was associated with lower odds of 30-day hospital admission and may inform risk stratification and interventions. Evidence-based survey items linked to patient outcomes may also inform future surveys.

患者体验评分与入院风险的多站点分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:常规收集的患者体验评分可为患者预后风险提供参考。本研究旨在评估第三方收到患者体验调查后 30 天内的入院风险,并为干预措施提供指导:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月一家机构在美国四个州的 20 家医院进行的《医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估》(Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems)调查。调查采用普查抽样的方式定期发送给患者。我们对出院后 60 天内收到的调查进行了分析,这些患者居住地距离该机构的任何一家医院均不超过 60 英里。调查对象包括 19 个调查项目。结果为第三方收到调查后 30 天内的入院情况。我们在包括患者和住院特征的模型中评估了调查项目的有利得分(顶格)与不利得分(非顶格)与 30 天入院风险的关系,并报告了调整后的几率比(aOR [95% 置信区间]):在 40,162 名受访者(平均年龄 ± 标准差:68.1 ± 14.0 岁)中,49.8% 为女性,4.3% 曾住院 30 天。与未入院患者相比,30 天入院患者更有可能从医疗服务线出院(62.9% vs 42.3%;P 医院评分与总体队列(0.88 [0.77-0.99];P = 0.04)、医疗服务线(0.81 [0.70-0.94];P = 0.007)和 Elixhauser 指数上四分位数(0.79 [0.67-0.92];P = 0.003)中 30 天入院几率较低有关。在医疗服务项目中,推荐医院的良好评分与较低的 30 天入院几率相关(0.83 [0.71-0.97];P = 0.02),但与其他项目(如医院环境清洁度)没有关联:结论:在常规收集的患者体验评分中,医院好评率与较低的 30 天入院几率相关,可为风险分层和干预措施提供参考。以证据为基础的调查项目与患者的治疗效果相关联,也可为今后的调查提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信