Exploring patients' experiences of the impact of dialysis therapies on quality of life and wellbeing

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Joe Antoun BSc, Daniel J. Brown PhD, Daniel J. W. Jones PhD, Beth G. Clarkson PhD, Anthony I. Shepherd PhD, Nicholas C. Sangala MBBS, Robert J. Lewis MD, Melitta A. McNarry PhD, Kelly A. Mackintosh PhD, Laura Mason PhD, Jo Corbett PhD, Zoe L. Saynor PhD
{"title":"Exploring patients' experiences of the impact of dialysis therapies on quality of life and wellbeing","authors":"Joe Antoun BSc,&nbsp;Daniel J. Brown PhD,&nbsp;Daniel J. W. Jones PhD,&nbsp;Beth G. Clarkson PhD,&nbsp;Anthony I. Shepherd PhD,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Sangala MBBS,&nbsp;Robert J. Lewis MD,&nbsp;Melitta A. McNarry PhD,&nbsp;Kelly A. Mackintosh PhD,&nbsp;Laura Mason PhD,&nbsp;Jo Corbett PhD,&nbsp;Zoe L. Saynor PhD","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>When people with chronic kidney disease reach kidney failure, renal replacement therapy is usually required to improve symptoms and maintain life. Although in-centre haemodialysis is most commonly used for this purpose, other forms of dialysis are available, including home haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to explore the experiences of adults living with chronic kidney disease who were either approaching the need for dialysis or had reached kidney failure and were receiving a form of dialysis. In particular, we explored how different forms of dialysis affect their quality of life, wellbeing, and physical activity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 40 adults with kidney failure, comprising four groups (<i>n</i> = 10 each<i>)</i>: those receiving in-centre haemodialysis, home haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, or predialysis. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, thematically analysed, and then composite vignettes were subsequently developed to present a rich narrative of the collective experiences of each group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with adults who were predialysis, quality of life and wellbeing improved upon initiation of their home haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Conversely, minimal improvement was perceived by those receiving in-centre haemodialysis. Low physical activity was reported across all four groups, although those receiving home haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis reported a greater desire and ability to be physically active than those in-centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings highlight that dialysis modalities not requiring regular hospital attendance (i.e., home haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) improve independence, quality of life, wellbeing, and can facilitate a more physically active lifestyle.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12416","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

When people with chronic kidney disease reach kidney failure, renal replacement therapy is usually required to improve symptoms and maintain life. Although in-centre haemodialysis is most commonly used for this purpose, other forms of dialysis are available, including home haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Objectives

We aimed to explore the experiences of adults living with chronic kidney disease who were either approaching the need for dialysis or had reached kidney failure and were receiving a form of dialysis. In particular, we explored how different forms of dialysis affect their quality of life, wellbeing, and physical activity.

Methods

Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 40 adults with kidney failure, comprising four groups (n = 10 each): those receiving in-centre haemodialysis, home haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, or predialysis. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, thematically analysed, and then composite vignettes were subsequently developed to present a rich narrative of the collective experiences of each group.

Findings

Compared with adults who were predialysis, quality of life and wellbeing improved upon initiation of their home haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Conversely, minimal improvement was perceived by those receiving in-centre haemodialysis. Low physical activity was reported across all four groups, although those receiving home haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis reported a greater desire and ability to be physically active than those in-centre.

Conclusion

These findings highlight that dialysis modalities not requiring regular hospital attendance (i.e., home haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) improve independence, quality of life, wellbeing, and can facilitate a more physically active lifestyle.

探讨透析治疗对患者生活质量和健康的影响
当慢性肾脏病患者达到肾功能衰竭时,通常需要肾脏替代治疗来改善症状和维持生命。虽然中心血液透析最常用于此目的,但也可采用其他形式的透析,包括家庭血液透析和腹膜透析。我们的目的是探讨患有慢性肾脏疾病的成年人的经历,他们要么接近透析的需要,要么已经达到肾衰竭,正在接受某种形式的透析。特别是,我们探索了不同形式的透析如何影响他们的生活质量、健康和身体活动。方法对40例成人肾功能衰竭患者进行了半结构化访谈,分为四组(n = 10):接受中心血液透析、家庭血液透析或腹膜透析和透析前透析。采访被逐字记录下来,按主题进行分析,然后合成小插曲随后被开发出来,以呈现每个群体的集体经历的丰富叙述。研究结果:与透析前的成年人相比,开始家庭血液透析或腹膜透析后,生活质量和健康状况有所改善。相反,接受中心血液透析的患者改善甚微。尽管接受家庭血液透析和腹膜透析的患者比接受中心透析的患者更渴望和更有能力进行身体活动,但四组患者的身体活动水平均较低。这些发现强调,不需要定期住院的透析方式(即家庭血液透析和腹膜透析)可以提高独立性、生活质量和健康,并可以促进更积极的生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of renal care
Journal of renal care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA). The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given. The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信