Exactitud diagnóstica en el cáncer de esófago localizado. Estudio observacional retrospectivo.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Ainhoa Andrés-Imaz, Laura Martí-Gelonch, Emma Eizaguirre-Letamendia, José I Asensio-Gallego, José M Enríquez-Navascués
{"title":"Exactitud diagnóstica en el cáncer de esófago localizado. Estudio observacional retrospectivo.","authors":"Ainhoa Andrés-Imaz,&nbsp;Laura Martí-Gelonch,&nbsp;Emma Eizaguirre-Letamendia,&nbsp;José I Asensio-Gallego,&nbsp;José M Enríquez-Navascués","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.21000722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the accuracy of the diagnostic tests for a correct clinical tumor staging in localized esophageal cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective observational study of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer in a referral hospital between January 2003 and September 2019. Those patients who received neoadjuvant treatment were excluded in order to avoid bias from downstaging effects. The preoperative stage was compared with the pathological stage of the surgical specimen. Computed tomography (CT) , endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and positron emission tomography (PET) were evaluated. The pT stage was correlated with the tumor length described in the esophagram (EG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 63 patients included, the clinical staging was correct in 16 (global accuracy 25.4%), it was overstaged in 21 (33.2%) and understaged in 26 (41.3%). For cT staging, the accuracy of EUS was higher than that of CT (46.6% and 34.9%, respectively), specially for early stages. EG tumor length correlated with pT stage (p < 0.05). For cN staging, PET had the highest sensitivity (50.0%) and negative predictive value (75.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the multiple diagnostic tools used, the global accuracy of clinical staging in localized EC is still a challenge. The lack of a test that stands out significantly from the others reinforces the need to use them in a complementary way.</p>","PeriodicalId":50990,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","volume":"91 1","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of the diagnostic tests for a correct clinical tumor staging in localized esophageal cancer (EC).

Method: Retrospective observational study of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer in a referral hospital between January 2003 and September 2019. Those patients who received neoadjuvant treatment were excluded in order to avoid bias from downstaging effects. The preoperative stage was compared with the pathological stage of the surgical specimen. Computed tomography (CT) , endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and positron emission tomography (PET) were evaluated. The pT stage was correlated with the tumor length described in the esophagram (EG).

Results: Among the 63 patients included, the clinical staging was correct in 16 (global accuracy 25.4%), it was overstaged in 21 (33.2%) and understaged in 26 (41.3%). For cT staging, the accuracy of EUS was higher than that of CT (46.6% and 34.9%, respectively), specially for early stages. EG tumor length correlated with pT stage (p < 0.05). For cN staging, PET had the highest sensitivity (50.0%) and negative predictive value (75.0%).

Conclusions: Despite the multiple diagnostic tools used, the global accuracy of clinical staging in localized EC is still a challenge. The lack of a test that stands out significantly from the others reinforces the need to use them in a complementary way.

局部食道癌的诊断准确性。回顾性观察性研究。
目的:评价局部食管癌临床分期诊断方法的准确性。方法:回顾性观察研究2003年1月至2019年9月在某转诊医院行食管癌切除术的患者。那些接受新辅助治疗的患者被排除在外,以避免因降低分期效应而产生偏倚。术前分期与手术标本病理分期比较。计算机断层扫描(CT),内镜超声扫描(EUS)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行评估。pT分期与食管造影(EG)显示的肿瘤长度相关。结果:纳入的63例患者中,临床分期正确16例(总体准确率25.4%),分期过期21例(33.2%),分期不足26例(41.3%)。对于cT分期,EUS的准确率高于cT(分别为46.6%和34.9%),尤其是早期。EG肿瘤长度与pT分期相关(p < 0.05)。对于cN分期,PET具有最高的敏感性(50.0%)和阴性预测值(75.0%)。结论:尽管使用了多种诊断工具,但局部EC临床分期的整体准确性仍然是一个挑战。由于缺乏一种能够明显地从其他测试中脱颖而出的测试,因此需要以一种互补的方式使用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cirugia Y Cirujanos
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cirugía y Cirujanoses exponente del desarrollo académico, científico, médico, quirúrgico y tecnológico en materia de salud en México y en el ámbito internacional. Es una revista bimestral, open access, revisada por pares, que publica en español y en inglés (traducido sin coste para los autores) artículos científicos originales, casos clínicos, artículos de revisión de interés general y cartas al editor. Los artículos se seleccionan y publican siguiendo un riguroso análisis, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionalmente aceptados. Sus espacios están abiertos a los académicos, así como a todo miembro de la comunidad médica que manifieste interés por utilizar este foro para publicar sus trabajos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信