Psychotic Misdiagnosis of Racially Minoritized Patients: A Case-Based Ethics, Equity, and Educational Exploration.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Anita M Jegarl, Oluwole Jegede, Jessica Isom, Nicole Ciarleglio, Carmen Black
{"title":"Psychotic Misdiagnosis of Racially Minoritized Patients: A Case-Based Ethics, Equity, and Educational Exploration.","authors":"Anita M Jegarl,&nbsp;Oluwole Jegede,&nbsp;Jessica Isom,&nbsp;Nicole Ciarleglio,&nbsp;Carmen Black","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of racially minoritized groups as having a primary psychotic disorder is one of psychiatry's longest-standing inequities born of real-time clinician racial bias. Evidence suggests that providers assign a diagnosis of schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective disorder according to race more than any other demographic variable, and this inequity persists even in the absence of differences in clinician symptom ratings. This case report describes the journey of one young Black woman through her racialized misdiagnosis of schizophrenia and the process by which interdisciplinary, health equity-minded providers across the spectrum of medical education and practice joined together to provide a culturally informed, systematic rediagnosis of major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Expert discussion is provided by three Black academic psychiatrists with expertise in social justice and health equity. We provide an evidence-based exploration of mechanisms of clinician racial bias and detail how the psychosis misdiagnosis of racially minoritized groups fails medical ethics and perpetuates iatrogenic harm to patients who truly need help with primary mood, trauma, and substance use disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"31 1","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: The overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of racially minoritized groups as having a primary psychotic disorder is one of psychiatry's longest-standing inequities born of real-time clinician racial bias. Evidence suggests that providers assign a diagnosis of schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective disorder according to race more than any other demographic variable, and this inequity persists even in the absence of differences in clinician symptom ratings. This case report describes the journey of one young Black woman through her racialized misdiagnosis of schizophrenia and the process by which interdisciplinary, health equity-minded providers across the spectrum of medical education and practice joined together to provide a culturally informed, systematic rediagnosis of major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Expert discussion is provided by three Black academic psychiatrists with expertise in social justice and health equity. We provide an evidence-based exploration of mechanisms of clinician racial bias and detail how the psychosis misdiagnosis of racially minoritized groups fails medical ethics and perpetuates iatrogenic harm to patients who truly need help with primary mood, trauma, and substance use disorders.

少数族裔患者的精神病误诊:基于个案的伦理、公平与教育探索。
摘要:对少数族裔群体的过度诊断和误诊为原发性精神障碍是精神病学长期存在的不公平现象之一,这种不公平源于临床医生的种族偏见。有证据表明,提供者根据种族而不是其他人口统计学变量来分配精神分裂症和/或分裂情感性障碍的诊断,即使在临床医生症状评分没有差异的情况下,这种不平等仍然存在。本病例报告描述了一名年轻黑人妇女的精神分裂症种族化误诊的历程,以及跨医学教育和实践领域的跨学科、注重健康公平的提供者联合起来,为重度抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍提供文化信息、系统的重新诊断的过程。专家讨论由三名在社会正义和健康公平方面具有专长的黑人学术精神科医生提供。我们对临床医生种族偏见的机制进行了基于证据的探索,并详细说明了少数种族群体的精神病误诊是如何违背医学伦理的,并使那些真正需要帮助的原发性情绪、创伤和物质使用障碍患者的医源性伤害持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信