Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nishita Singh, Bijoy K Menon, Adam A Dmytriw, Robert W Regenhardt, Joshua A Hirsch, Aravind Ganesh
{"title":"Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?","authors":"Nishita Singh,&nbsp;Bijoy K Menon,&nbsp;Adam A Dmytriw,&nbsp;Robert W Regenhardt,&nbsp;Joshua A Hirsch,&nbsp;Aravind Ganesh","doi":"10.5853/jos.2022.02880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerged as another potential choice for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will focus on these recent advances, aiming: (1) to provide a brief overview of thrombolysis in stroke; (2) to provide comparisons between alteplase and TNK for clinical, imaging, and safety outcomes; (3) to focus on key subgroups of interest to understand if there is an advantage of using TNK over alteplase or vice-versa, to review available evidence on role of TNK in intra-arterial thrombolysis, as bridging therapy and in mobile stroke units; and (4) to summarize what to expect in the near future from recently completed trials and propose areas for future research on this evolving topic. We present compelling data from several trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TNK in acute ischemic stroke along with completed yet unpublished trials that will help provide insight into these unanswered questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke","volume":"25 1","pages":"72-80"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/e4/jos-2022-02880.PMC9911848.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.02880","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerged as another potential choice for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will focus on these recent advances, aiming: (1) to provide a brief overview of thrombolysis in stroke; (2) to provide comparisons between alteplase and TNK for clinical, imaging, and safety outcomes; (3) to focus on key subgroups of interest to understand if there is an advantage of using TNK over alteplase or vice-versa, to review available evidence on role of TNK in intra-arterial thrombolysis, as bridging therapy and in mobile stroke units; and (4) to summarize what to expect in the near future from recently completed trials and propose areas for future research on this evolving topic. We present compelling data from several trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TNK in acute ischemic stroke along with completed yet unpublished trials that will help provide insight into these unanswered questions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

替替普酶替代替替普酶:时机成熟了吗?
四分之一个世纪以来,急性缺血性中风的溶栓主要是阿替普酶。近年来,随着试验显示tenecteplase (TNK)与阿替普酶相比具有更高的再灌注成功率,相似的安全性和有效性,TNK现已成为急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗的另一种潜在选择。在这篇综述中,我们将关注这些最新进展,旨在:(1)提供脑卒中溶栓的简要概述;(2)比较阿替普酶和TNK的临床、影像学和安全性结果;(3)关注关键亚组,以了解使用TNK是否优于阿替普酶或相反,以审查TNK在动脉内溶栓、桥接治疗和移动卒中单元中的作用的现有证据;(4)总结最近完成的试验在不久的将来会发生什么,并就这一不断发展的主题提出未来的研究领域。我们提供了几项关于TNK在急性缺血性卒中中的安全性和有效性的令人信服的试验数据,以及已完成但尚未发表的试验,这些试验将有助于深入了解这些未回答的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Stroke
Journal of Stroke CLINICAL NEUROLOGYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISE-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke (JoS) is a peer-reviewed publication that focuses on clinical and basic investigation of cerebral circulation and associated diseases in stroke-related fields. Its aim is to enhance patient management, education, clinical or experimental research, and professionalism. The journal covers various areas of stroke research, including pathophysiology, risk factors, symptomatology, imaging, treatment, and rehabilitation. Basic science research is included when it provides clinically relevant information. The JoS is particularly interested in studies that highlight characteristics of stroke in the Asian population, as they are underrepresented in the literature. The JoS had an impact factor of 8.2 in 2022 and aims to provide high-quality research papers to readers while maintaining a strong reputation. It is published three times a year, on the last day of January, May, and September. The online version of the journal is considered the main version as it includes all available content. Supplementary issues are occasionally published. The journal is indexed in various databases, including SCI(E), Pubmed, PubMed Central, Scopus, KoreaMed, Komci, Synapse, Science Central, Google Scholar, and DOI/Crossref. It is also the official journal of the Korean Stroke Society since 1999, with the abbreviated title J Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信