Michelina Casale, Lorena Draghini, Fabio Trippa, Sara Costantini, Lisa Vicenzi, Letizia Tesei, Alessandro Di Marzo, Fabio Arcidiacono, Marco Italiani, Ernesto Maranzano
{"title":"Reliability of algebraic sum to evaluate adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy cumulative doses in uterine cancers.","authors":"Michelina Casale, Lorena Draghini, Fabio Trippa, Sara Costantini, Lisa Vicenzi, Letizia Tesei, Alessandro Di Marzo, Fabio Arcidiacono, Marco Italiani, Ernesto Maranzano","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2022.121175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reliability of algebraic sum with respect to rigid fusion of treatment plans related to adjuvant external beam pelvic radiotherapy (APR) and vaginal cuff high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) in uterine cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For algebraic sum, APR and BT doses were mathematically added. Rigid fusion was realized overlapping computed tomography (CT) images of APR and BT treatment plans. Rectum and bladder were considered reference organs at risk (OARs). Following dose (D) parameters were examined: D<sub>max</sub> (0.5 cc), D<sub>20%</sub> and D<sub>50%</sub> for rectum, D<sub>max</sub> (0.5 cc) and D<sub>50%</sub> for bladder; for each parameter, differences between the two adopted methods were reported as Δ-values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty uterine cancer patients submitted to radical surgery followed by APR plus vaginal cuff BT were reviewed. APR was done with a dose of 25 × 2 Gy. All patients also receveid a vaginal cuff boost with BT at the dose of 2 × 5 Gy. Differences between mean cumulative doses calculated with rigid fusion and algebraic sum were evaluated. For the rectum and bladder ΔD<sub>50%</sub>, there were no significant differences, and BT contribution resulted minimal. An apparent significant difference value was registered in bladder ΔD<sub>max</sub> (0.5 cc). No toxicity was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In uterine cancer patients submitted to APR and vaginal cuff BT, algebraic sum and rigid plan fusion of doses allowed to obtain similar results in evaluating cumulative OARs' doses. Further investigations and increased number of patients are recommended to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"14 5","pages":"470-475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/fa/JCB-14-48174.PMC9720693.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.121175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of algebraic sum with respect to rigid fusion of treatment plans related to adjuvant external beam pelvic radiotherapy (APR) and vaginal cuff high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) in uterine cancer patients.
Material and methods: For algebraic sum, APR and BT doses were mathematically added. Rigid fusion was realized overlapping computed tomography (CT) images of APR and BT treatment plans. Rectum and bladder were considered reference organs at risk (OARs). Following dose (D) parameters were examined: Dmax (0.5 cc), D20% and D50% for rectum, Dmax (0.5 cc) and D50% for bladder; for each parameter, differences between the two adopted methods were reported as Δ-values.
Results: Twenty uterine cancer patients submitted to radical surgery followed by APR plus vaginal cuff BT were reviewed. APR was done with a dose of 25 × 2 Gy. All patients also receveid a vaginal cuff boost with BT at the dose of 2 × 5 Gy. Differences between mean cumulative doses calculated with rigid fusion and algebraic sum were evaluated. For the rectum and bladder ΔD50%, there were no significant differences, and BT contribution resulted minimal. An apparent significant difference value was registered in bladder ΔDmax (0.5 cc). No toxicity was observed.
Conclusions: In uterine cancer patients submitted to APR and vaginal cuff BT, algebraic sum and rigid plan fusion of doses allowed to obtain similar results in evaluating cumulative OARs' doses. Further investigations and increased number of patients are recommended to confirm our findings.
期刊介绍:
The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.