Theory analysis and evaluation of emancipatory nursing praxis: A theory of social justice in nursing

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Tiffany H. Elliott MSN, RN, CHSE
{"title":"Theory analysis and evaluation of emancipatory nursing praxis: A theory of social justice in nursing","authors":"Tiffany H. Elliott MSN, RN, CHSE","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this paper was to analyze and evaluate the middle-range theory, emancipatory nursing praxis (ENP): a theory of social justice in nursing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Peterson and Bredow's method was utilized to complete the theory evaluation. The theory was evaluated systematically to ensure the appropriateness of application for research in nursing education and transforming nursing students into social justice allies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The ENP theory has not been widely used since its introduction in 2017, although it is even more relevant today after the revelation of profound societal inequities during the pandemic. The theory lacks testing and empirical indicators for utilization in nursing practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ENP addresses the mandate from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing for nurse educators to foster the development of students as social justice leaders and competent caregivers across the life span. This theory provides a framework to apply in nursing education to improve the professional competency in social justice and disparities. However, further research is needed to develop tools to measure outcomes and generalizability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for nursing practice</h3>\n \n <p>ENP middle-range theory could support nursing educators and nursing programs to develop learning strategies and curricula to facilitate nursing students’ knowledge and application in social justice advocates, allies, and leaders, thus improving individual, community, and global health outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":"35 1","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper was to analyze and evaluate the middle-range theory, emancipatory nursing praxis (ENP): a theory of social justice in nursing.

Methods

Peterson and Bredow's method was utilized to complete the theory evaluation. The theory was evaluated systematically to ensure the appropriateness of application for research in nursing education and transforming nursing students into social justice allies.

Findings

The ENP theory has not been widely used since its introduction in 2017, although it is even more relevant today after the revelation of profound societal inequities during the pandemic. The theory lacks testing and empirical indicators for utilization in nursing practice.

Conclusion

ENP addresses the mandate from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing for nurse educators to foster the development of students as social justice leaders and competent caregivers across the life span. This theory provides a framework to apply in nursing education to improve the professional competency in social justice and disparities. However, further research is needed to develop tools to measure outcomes and generalizability.

Implications for nursing practice

ENP middle-range theory could support nursing educators and nursing programs to develop learning strategies and curricula to facilitate nursing students’ knowledge and application in social justice advocates, allies, and leaders, thus improving individual, community, and global health outcomes.

解放护理实践的理论分析与评价:护理中的社会正义理论。
目的:本文旨在分析和评价中程理论--解放护理实践(ENP):护理中的社会公正理论:方法:采用 Peterson 和 Bredow 的方法完成理论评估。对该理论进行了系统评估,以确保其适用于护理教育研究,并将护理专业学生转变为社会正义同盟:ENP理论自2017年提出以来尚未得到广泛应用,尽管在大流行病期间揭露了深刻的社会不公平现象后,该理论在今天显得更加重要。该理论在护理实践中的应用缺乏检验和实证指标:ENP满足了美国护理学院协会对护士教育者的要求,即培养学生成为社会正义的领导者和有能力的终身护理者。该理论提供了一个应用于护理教育的框架,以提高学生在社会公正和差异方面的专业能力。然而,还需要进一步的研究来开发衡量成果和可推广性的工具:ENP 中程理论可支持护理教育者和护理项目开发学习策略和课程,以促进护理学生在社会正义倡导者、盟友和领导者方面的知识和应用,从而改善个人、社区和全球健康成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信