{"title":"Bayesian Complex Innovative Trial Designs (CIDs) and Their Use in Drug Development for Rare Disease.","authors":"Bradley P Carlin, Fabrice Nollevaux","doi":"10.1002/jcph.2132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the temporal, financial, and ethical cost of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) continues to rise, researchers and regulators in drug discovery and development face increasing pressure to make better use of existing data sources. This pressure is especially high in rare disease, where traditionally designed RCTs are often infeasible due to the inability to recruit enough patients or the unwillingness of patients or trial leaders to randomly assign anyone to placebo. Bayesian statistical methods have recently been recommended in such settings for their ability to combine disparate data sources, increasing overall study power. The use of these methods has received a boost in the United States thanks to a new willingness by regulators at the Food and Drug Administration to consider complex innovative trial designs. These designs allow trialists to change the nature of the trial (eg, stop early for success or futility, drop an underperforming trial arm, incorporate data on historical controls, etc) while it is still running. In this article, we review a broad collection of Bayesian techniques useful in rare disease research, indicating the benefits and risks associated with each. We begin with relatively innocuous methods for combining information from RCTs and proceed on through increasingly innovative approaches that borrow strength from increasingly heterogeneous and less carefully curated data sources. We also offer 2 examples from the very recent literature illustrating how clinical pharmacology principles can make important contributions to such designs, confirming the interdisciplinary nature of this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.2132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
As the temporal, financial, and ethical cost of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) continues to rise, researchers and regulators in drug discovery and development face increasing pressure to make better use of existing data sources. This pressure is especially high in rare disease, where traditionally designed RCTs are often infeasible due to the inability to recruit enough patients or the unwillingness of patients or trial leaders to randomly assign anyone to placebo. Bayesian statistical methods have recently been recommended in such settings for their ability to combine disparate data sources, increasing overall study power. The use of these methods has received a boost in the United States thanks to a new willingness by regulators at the Food and Drug Administration to consider complex innovative trial designs. These designs allow trialists to change the nature of the trial (eg, stop early for success or futility, drop an underperforming trial arm, incorporate data on historical controls, etc) while it is still running. In this article, we review a broad collection of Bayesian techniques useful in rare disease research, indicating the benefits and risks associated with each. We begin with relatively innocuous methods for combining information from RCTs and proceed on through increasingly innovative approaches that borrow strength from increasingly heterogeneous and less carefully curated data sources. We also offer 2 examples from the very recent literature illustrating how clinical pharmacology principles can make important contributions to such designs, confirming the interdisciplinary nature of this work.
随着随机临床试验(rct)的时间、财务和伦理成本持续上升,药物发现和开发的研究人员和监管机构面临着越来越大的压力,需要更好地利用现有的数据来源。这种压力在罕见疾病中尤其大,传统设计的随机对照试验通常是不可行的,因为无法招募足够的患者,或者患者或试验领导者不愿意随机分配任何人服用安慰剂。贝叶斯统计方法最近在这样的环境中被推荐,因为它们能够结合不同的数据源,提高整体研究能力。由于美国食品和药物管理局(Food and Drug Administration)的监管机构愿意考虑复杂的创新试验设计,这些方法的使用在美国得到了推动。这些设计允许试验人员在试验仍在进行时改变试验的性质(例如,为了成功或无效而提前停止试验,放弃表现不佳的试验臂,纳入历史对照数据等)。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了在罕见病研究中有用的贝叶斯技术的广泛集合,指出了与每种技术相关的益处和风险。我们从相对无害的方法开始,结合来自随机对照试验的信息,然后通过越来越创新的方法继续进行,这些方法从越来越多的异质和不太仔细整理的数据源中汲取力量。我们还从最近的文献中提供了两个例子,说明临床药理学原理如何对这种设计做出重要贡献,证实了这项工作的跨学科性质。