Effet d’un club de lecture sur le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle, les attentes et les intentions d’étudiantes en sciences infirmières à l’égard de l’utilisation des résultats probants.

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine
Caroline Gibbons, Jimmy Bourque, Tim Aubry
{"title":"Effet d’un club de lecture sur le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle, les attentes et les intentions d’étudiantes en sciences infirmières à l’égard de l’utilisation des résultats probants.","authors":"Caroline Gibbons,&nbsp;Jimmy Bourque,&nbsp;Tim Aubry","doi":"10.3917/rsi.146.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nursing associations require that nurses develop the skills to integrate evidence into practice to support the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Lack of self-confidence in the operational steps of evidence-based practice was identified as a barrier to integrating evidence into nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of a journal club (JC) on nursing students' self-efficacy (SE), expectations, and intentions to use evidence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Quasi-experimental, longitudinal approach with a non-randomized comparison group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The development of SE toward the use of evidence-based practices favored students who participated in the JC (n=48) compared to students who received a conventional educational modality (CEM) (n=50). However, there was no significant group x time interaction effect on expectations or intentions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The significant positive changes beyond the CEM may be explained by the fact that the JC incorporated modes of influence on SE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive effect associated with the JC on SE is difficult to sustain without continued practice. It is important to maintain high outcome expectations within nursing training.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":"146 3","pages":"44-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.146.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nursing associations require that nurses develop the skills to integrate evidence into practice to support the quality of care.

Context: Lack of self-confidence in the operational steps of evidence-based practice was identified as a barrier to integrating evidence into nursing practice.

Objective: To assess the effect of a journal club (JC) on nursing students' self-efficacy (SE), expectations, and intentions to use evidence.

Method: Quasi-experimental, longitudinal approach with a non-randomized comparison group.

Results: The development of SE toward the use of evidence-based practices favored students who participated in the JC (n=48) compared to students who received a conventional educational modality (CEM) (n=50). However, there was no significant group x time interaction effect on expectations or intentions.

Discussion: The significant positive changes beyond the CEM may be explained by the fact that the JC incorporated modes of influence on SE.

Conclusion: The positive effect associated with the JC on SE is difficult to sustain without continued practice. It is important to maintain high outcome expectations within nursing training.

阅读俱乐部对护理学生个人效能感、期望和使用证据的意图的影响。
导言:护理协会要求护士发展技能,将证据整合到实践中,以支持护理质量。背景:在循证实践的操作步骤中缺乏自信被认为是将证据整合到护理实践中的障碍。目的:评价期刊俱乐部(JC)对护生自我效能感(SE)、期望和意向的影响。方法:准实验,纵向方法,非随机对照组。结果:与接受传统教育模式(CEM)的学生(n=50)相比,参与JC的学生(n=48)更倾向于使用循证实践的SE发展。然而,组x时间对期望或意图没有显著的交互作用。讨论:CEM之外的重大积极变化可能是因为JC纳入了对SE的影响模式。结论:如果没有持续的练习,JC对SE的积极作用很难维持。在护理培训中保持高结果期望是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信