Registry Data in Injury Research: Study Designs and Interpretation.

3区 医学
Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1007/s40471-022-00311-x
Stephen J Mooney, Andrew G Rundle, Christopher N Morrison
{"title":"Registry Data in Injury Research: Study Designs and Interpretation.","authors":"Stephen J Mooney, Andrew G Rundle, Christopher N Morrison","doi":"10.1007/s40471-022-00311-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Injury data is frequently captured in registries that form a census of 100% of known cases that meet specified inclusion criteria. These data are routinely used in injury research with a variety of study designs. We reviewed study designs commonly used with data extracted from injury registries and evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of each design type.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Registry data are suited to 5 major design types: (1) Description, (2) Ecologic (with Ecologic Cohort as a particularly informative sub-type), (3) Case-control (with location-based and culpability studies as salient subtypes), (4) Case-only (including case-case and case-crossover subtypes), and (5) Outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Registries are an important resource for injury research. Investigators considering use of a registry should be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of available study designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":"9 4","pages":"263-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912303/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00311-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose of review: Injury data is frequently captured in registries that form a census of 100% of known cases that meet specified inclusion criteria. These data are routinely used in injury research with a variety of study designs. We reviewed study designs commonly used with data extracted from injury registries and evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of each design type.

Recent findings: Registry data are suited to 5 major design types: (1) Description, (2) Ecologic (with Ecologic Cohort as a particularly informative sub-type), (3) Case-control (with location-based and culpability studies as salient subtypes), (4) Case-only (including case-case and case-crossover subtypes), and (5) Outcomes.

Summary: Registries are an important resource for injury research. Investigators considering use of a registry should be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of available study designs.

Abstract Image

损伤研究中的登记数据:研究设计和解释。
审查目的:伤害数据经常被收录在登记处,这些登记处构成了100%符合特定纳入标准的已知病例的普查。这些数据通常用于各种研究设计的损伤研究。我们回顾了从损伤登记中提取数据的常用研究设计,并评估了每种设计类型的优缺点。最近的发现:登记数据适用于5种主要设计类型:(1)描述型,(2)生态型(以生态队列为特别信息丰富的亚型),(3)病例对照型(以基于地点和罪责研究为突出亚型),(4)仅病例型(包括病例-病例和病例交叉亚型),以及(5)结局型。摘要:登记是损伤研究的重要资源。考虑使用注册表的研究者应该了解现有研究设计的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信