Managing Families' Expectations in the Coronial Jurisdiction: Barriers to Enacting an Ethic of Care.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01
Belinda Carpenter, Gordon Tait, Steph Jowett
{"title":"Managing Families' Expectations in the Coronial Jurisdiction: Barriers to Enacting an Ethic of Care.","authors":"Belinda Carpenter,&nbsp;Gordon Tait,&nbsp;Steph Jowett","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronial jurisdiction is different in function, character and procedure to most other legal processes in Australia, being inquisitorial rather than adversarial. It is also, by virtue of its focus on the circumstances of death, situated at the intersection of trauma and grief on the one hand, and legal exploration and evidence-gathering, on the other. For families a coronial investigation offers the potential for resolution about a death, but it can also exacerbate grief and trauma, particularly in the public forum of an inquest. This article utilises interviews with legal professionals engaged in the coronial jurisdiction to explore their understanding of the issues that impact upon families during a death investigation. Our findings indicate that an ethics of care is evident in the court but that this remains contingent on adequate resourcing of the sector, and that this is increasingly the case as the jurisdiction becomes more specialised.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"29 4","pages":"1040-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronial jurisdiction is different in function, character and procedure to most other legal processes in Australia, being inquisitorial rather than adversarial. It is also, by virtue of its focus on the circumstances of death, situated at the intersection of trauma and grief on the one hand, and legal exploration and evidence-gathering, on the other. For families a coronial investigation offers the potential for resolution about a death, but it can also exacerbate grief and trauma, particularly in the public forum of an inquest. This article utilises interviews with legal professionals engaged in the coronial jurisdiction to explore their understanding of the issues that impact upon families during a death investigation. Our findings indicate that an ethics of care is evident in the court but that this remains contingent on adequate resourcing of the sector, and that this is increasingly the case as the jurisdiction becomes more specialised.

在司法管辖区管理家庭期望:制定关怀伦理的障碍。
在职能、性质和程序上,冠状法院管辖权与澳大利亚大多数其他法律程序不同,是调查性的,而不是对抗性的。此外,由于其对死亡情况的关注,它一方面处于创伤和悲伤的交叉点,另一方面又处于法律探索和证据收集的交叉点。对于家属来说,验尸调查提供了解决死亡问题的可能,但它也可能加剧悲伤和创伤,尤其是在公开的调查场合。本文利用与从事刑事司法的法律专业人员的访谈,探讨他们对死亡调查期间影响家庭的问题的理解。我们的研究结果表明,在法庭上,护理伦理是显而易见的,但这仍然取决于该部门是否有足够的资源,而且随着司法管辖区变得更加专业化,这种情况越来越多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信